通过仿真驱动的误码率、信噪比和q因子性能分析,优化医院环境下的直接调制激光LiFi系统。

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2026-04-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3
Ajay Sharma, Lalit Garg, Peter A Xuereb
{"title":"通过仿真驱动的误码率、信噪比和q因子性能分析,优化医院环境下的直接调制激光LiFi系统。","authors":"Ajay Sharma, Lalit Garg, Peter A Xuereb","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < <math><msup><mn>10</mn> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>9</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> ), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < 10 <sup>-9</sup>), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"6 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing direct-modulated laser LiFi systems for hospital environments through simulation-driven analysis of BER, SNR, and Q-factor performance.\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Sharma, Lalit Garg, Peter A Xuereb\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < <math><msup><mn>10</mn> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>9</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> ), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < 10 <sup>-9</sup>), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open research Europe\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open research Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代医院环境需要无线通信系统,以确保关键任务应用(如遥测、医疗成像和电子健康记录(EHR)同步)的电磁干扰(EMI)合规性、隐私性和高吞吐量。传统的基于射频的无线系统容易受到电磁干扰、有限的频谱可用性和安全问题的影响。基于直接调制激光(DML)的光保真度(LiFi)提供了一种有前途的替代方案,利用可见光谱进行高速、无干扰的通信,以实现预期的光发射。方法在理想的检测器噪声限制条件下,优化配置的误码率远低于常用的分析可靠性基准(误码率< 10 - 9),在25 m处信噪比≈74.94 dB, Q≈18.84。在~15 m以上需要发射功率≥+5 dBm, 0.8-1.0的调制指数在距离上产生更高的Q,窄波束发散(1-2 mrad)保持更强的信噪比,4-6 mm的接收器孔径提供光收集和噪声之间的平衡。结果优化配置的误码率远低于分析基准(误码率< 10 -9),在25 m处信噪比≈74.94 dB, Q≈18.84,在最佳情况下,良好对准的视线配置显示了可观的分析性能裕度。在~15 m以上需要发射功率= +5 dBm, 0.8-1.0的调制指数在距离上产生更高的Q,窄波束发散(1-2 mrad)保持更强的信噪比,4-6 mm的接收器孔径提供光收集和噪声之间的平衡。本文提出了一种适合医院环境的四参数DML-LiFi优化框架,为链路预算可行性和参数对理想室内环境的敏感性提供了理论解释。这些结果表明了一个上限性能研究,而不是部署就绪可靠性的演示,并且意味着在未来的实验和系统级研究中使用,这些研究侧重于移动性、视线阻塞、环境光诱导的射击噪声、电磁干扰采集和医院环境中的眼睛安全限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing direct-modulated laser LiFi systems for hospital environments through simulation-driven analysis of BER, SNR, and Q-factor performance.

Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( BER < 10 - 9 ), SNR ≈ 74.94 dB, and Q ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( BER < 10 -9), SNR ≈ 74.94 dB, and Q ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书