{"title":"通过仿真驱动的误码率、信噪比和q因子性能分析,优化医院环境下的直接调制激光LiFi系统。","authors":"Ajay Sharma, Lalit Garg, Peter A Xuereb","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < <math><msup><mn>10</mn> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>9</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> ), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < 10 <sup>-9</sup>), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"6 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing direct-modulated laser LiFi systems for hospital environments through simulation-driven analysis of BER, SNR, and Q-factor performance.\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Sharma, Lalit Garg, Peter A Xuereb\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < <math><msup><mn>10</mn> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>9</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> ), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( <i>BER</i> < 10 <sup>-9</sup>), <i>SNR</i> ≈ 74.94 dB, and <i>Q</i> ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open research Europe\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open research Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing direct-modulated laser LiFi systems for hospital environments through simulation-driven analysis of BER, SNR, and Q-factor performance.
Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( BER < ), SNR ≈ 74.94 dB, and Q ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( BER < 10 -9), SNR ≈ 74.94 dB, and Q ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8-1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1-2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4-6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.