重症监护病房机械通气患者吸痰过程中的伤害感受和疼痛评估:伤害感受水平指数(NOL™)的验证研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shiva Shahiri, Philippe Richebé, Marc O Martel, Patrick Lavoie, Céline Gélinas
{"title":"重症监护病房机械通气患者吸痰过程中的伤害感受和疼痛评估:伤害感受水平指数(NOL™)的验证研究","authors":"Shiva Shahiri, Philippe Richebé, Marc O Martel, Patrick Lavoie, Céline Gélinas","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2025.2561576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate pain through self-reports or behaviors. Though individual physiologic parameters (e.g. heart rate, HR) lack validity for ICU nociception and pain assessment, a multiparameter approach (i.e. Nociception Level index, NOL) has shown promise in anesthesia, but its use in the ICU is new.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the NOL for ICU nociception and pain assessment in mechanically ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, NOL values (0-100) were recorded before, during, and 15 min after a nonnociceptive procedure (blood pressure cuff inflation) and a nociceptive procedure (mouth, endotracheal, or tracheal suctioning) in patients able or not to self-report. Validation included discriminative (nociceptive vs. nonnociceptive procedures), criterion (pain intensity and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool, CPOT) and convergent (procedural pain distress) strategies, and test-retest reliability. HR validity was also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 53 enrolled patients, we had 14 losses (9 NOL-related), thus data from 39 were analyzed. Missing data occurred in 25% of patients at some time points. NOL median values were significantly higher during suctioning (>25) than cuff inflation (<10) and remained stable pre/postsuctioning. Positive correlations were found for pain intensity and CPOT but not for procedural pain distress. HR increased slightly during suctioning but was not correlated with pain criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The discriminative validity of the NOL was supported for ICU nociception in all patients and showed stable resting values. Criterion validity for pain assessment was only significant in patients able to self-report. Convergent validity was not supported. HR showed poor validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"10 1","pages":"2561576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13134404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nociception and pain assessment during suctioning procedures in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: A validation study of the Nociception Level index (NOL™).\",\"authors\":\"Shiva Shahiri, Philippe Richebé, Marc O Martel, Patrick Lavoie, Céline Gélinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2025.2561576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate pain through self-reports or behaviors. Though individual physiologic parameters (e.g. heart rate, HR) lack validity for ICU nociception and pain assessment, a multiparameter approach (i.e. Nociception Level index, NOL) has shown promise in anesthesia, but its use in the ICU is new.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the NOL for ICU nociception and pain assessment in mechanically ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, NOL values (0-100) were recorded before, during, and 15 min after a nonnociceptive procedure (blood pressure cuff inflation) and a nociceptive procedure (mouth, endotracheal, or tracheal suctioning) in patients able or not to self-report. Validation included discriminative (nociceptive vs. nonnociceptive procedures), criterion (pain intensity and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool, CPOT) and convergent (procedural pain distress) strategies, and test-retest reliability. HR validity was also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 53 enrolled patients, we had 14 losses (9 NOL-related), thus data from 39 were analyzed. Missing data occurred in 25% of patients at some time points. NOL median values were significantly higher during suctioning (>25) than cuff inflation (<10) and remained stable pre/postsuctioning. Positive correlations were found for pain intensity and CPOT but not for procedural pain distress. HR increased slightly during suctioning but was not correlated with pain criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The discriminative validity of the NOL was supported for ICU nociception in all patients and showed stable resting values. Criterion validity for pain assessment was only significant in patients able to self-report. Convergent validity was not supported. HR showed poor validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2561576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13134404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2561576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2561576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)的许多患者无法通过自我报告或行为来沟通疼痛。虽然个体生理参数(如心率、心率)对ICU伤害感觉和疼痛评估缺乏有效性,但多参数方法(如伤害感觉水平指数,NOL)在麻醉中显示出前景,但其在ICU中的应用是新的。目的:本研究的目的是验证NOL在ICU机械通气患者伤害感受和疼痛评估中的应用。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,在能够或不能够自我报告的患者进行非伤害性手术(血压袖带膨胀)和伤害性手术(口腔、气管内或气管吸痰)之前、期间和15分钟后记录NOL值(0-100)。验证包括判别性(伤害性与非伤害性程序)、标准性(疼痛强度和危重护理疼痛观察工具,CPOT)和收敛性(程序性疼痛痛苦)策略,以及重测信度。人力资源效度也进行了检验。结果:在53例入组患者中,我们有14例丢失(9例与nos相关),因此对39例患者的数据进行了分析。在某些时间点,25%的患者出现数据缺失。抽吸时NOL的中位数(bbb25)明显高于袖带充气时NOL的中位数(结论:所有患者的NOL判别效度均得到支持,且静息值稳定。疼痛评估的标准效度仅在能够自我报告的患者中有意义。不支持收敛效度。HR效度较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nociception and pain assessment during suctioning procedures in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: A validation study of the Nociception Level index (NOL™).

Background: Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate pain through self-reports or behaviors. Though individual physiologic parameters (e.g. heart rate, HR) lack validity for ICU nociception and pain assessment, a multiparameter approach (i.e. Nociception Level index, NOL) has shown promise in anesthesia, but its use in the ICU is new.

Aim: The aim of this study was to validate the NOL for ICU nociception and pain assessment in mechanically ventilated patients.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, NOL values (0-100) were recorded before, during, and 15 min after a nonnociceptive procedure (blood pressure cuff inflation) and a nociceptive procedure (mouth, endotracheal, or tracheal suctioning) in patients able or not to self-report. Validation included discriminative (nociceptive vs. nonnociceptive procedures), criterion (pain intensity and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool, CPOT) and convergent (procedural pain distress) strategies, and test-retest reliability. HR validity was also examined.

Results: Of 53 enrolled patients, we had 14 losses (9 NOL-related), thus data from 39 were analyzed. Missing data occurred in 25% of patients at some time points. NOL median values were significantly higher during suctioning (>25) than cuff inflation (<10) and remained stable pre/postsuctioning. Positive correlations were found for pain intensity and CPOT but not for procedural pain distress. HR increased slightly during suctioning but was not correlated with pain criteria.

Conclusions: The discriminative validity of the NOL was supported for ICU nociception in all patients and showed stable resting values. Criterion validity for pain assessment was only significant in patients able to self-report. Convergent validity was not supported. HR showed poor validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书