对比增强乳房x光造影阴性筛查后的间隔期癌症。

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Tali Amir, Carol H Lee, Sarah Eskreis-Winkler, Molly P Hogan, Noam Nissan, Varadan Sevilimedu, Victoria L Mango, Kimberly N Feigin, Maxine S Jochelson, Christopher E Comstock, Janice S Sung
{"title":"对比增强乳房x光造影阴性筛查后的间隔期癌症。","authors":"Tali Amir, Carol H Lee, Sarah Eskreis-Winkler, Molly P Hogan, Noam Nissan, Varadan Sevilimedu, Victoria L Mango, Kimberly N Feigin, Maxine S Jochelson, Christopher E Comstock, Janice S Sung","doi":"10.1148/rycan.250559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To determine the interval cancer rate (ICR) after negative screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and compare the characteristics of interval cancers (ICs) with those of CEM screen-detected cancers. Materials and Methods This retrospective, single-institution study included consecutive screening CEM examinations performed from January 2015 through December 2021. ICs diagnosed within 1 year of a negative screening CEM and all CEM screen-detected cancers were identified. Two breast radiologists independently reviewed prior negative CEM examinations to classify ICs as missed, misinterpreted, or occult. Patient- and lesion-level characteristics were compared between ICs and screen-detected cancers using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact or χ<sup>2</sup> tests for categorical variables. Results The study included 6911 screening CEM examinations in 2756 female patients (median age, 53 years; IQR, 47-60 years). Among 6120 negative screening examinations, 14 ICs were diagnosed in 14 patients. The overall ICR was 2.29 cancers per 1000 examinations, and the symptomatic ICR was 0.82 per 1000 examinations (five of 6120). ICs accounted for 13% (14 of 106) of all cancers diagnosed (interval and screen detected). Invasive ICs occurred more frequently in the setting of moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement than screen-detected cancers (six of eight, 75% vs 17 of 57, 30%; <i>P</i> = .02). Most ICs (10 of 14, 71%) were occult on prior screening CEM. Conclusion The ICR after CEM was 2.29 cancers per 1000 examinations, representing 13% of all cancers diagnosed. Most ICs were occult at prior CEM, and invasive ICs were more frequently associated with moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement when compared with CEM screen-detected cancers. <b>Keywords:</b> Mammography, Breast, Interval Cancers <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2026.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250559"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interval Cancers after Negative Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography.\",\"authors\":\"Tali Amir, Carol H Lee, Sarah Eskreis-Winkler, Molly P Hogan, Noam Nissan, Varadan Sevilimedu, Victoria L Mango, Kimberly N Feigin, Maxine S Jochelson, Christopher E Comstock, Janice S Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/rycan.250559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To determine the interval cancer rate (ICR) after negative screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and compare the characteristics of interval cancers (ICs) with those of CEM screen-detected cancers. Materials and Methods This retrospective, single-institution study included consecutive screening CEM examinations performed from January 2015 through December 2021. ICs diagnosed within 1 year of a negative screening CEM and all CEM screen-detected cancers were identified. Two breast radiologists independently reviewed prior negative CEM examinations to classify ICs as missed, misinterpreted, or occult. Patient- and lesion-level characteristics were compared between ICs and screen-detected cancers using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact or χ<sup>2</sup> tests for categorical variables. Results The study included 6911 screening CEM examinations in 2756 female patients (median age, 53 years; IQR, 47-60 years). Among 6120 negative screening examinations, 14 ICs were diagnosed in 14 patients. The overall ICR was 2.29 cancers per 1000 examinations, and the symptomatic ICR was 0.82 per 1000 examinations (five of 6120). ICs accounted for 13% (14 of 106) of all cancers diagnosed (interval and screen detected). Invasive ICs occurred more frequently in the setting of moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement than screen-detected cancers (six of eight, 75% vs 17 of 57, 30%; <i>P</i> = .02). Most ICs (10 of 14, 71%) were occult on prior screening CEM. Conclusion The ICR after CEM was 2.29 cancers per 1000 examinations, representing 13% of all cancers diagnosed. Most ICs were occult at prior CEM, and invasive ICs were more frequently associated with moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement when compared with CEM screen-detected cancers. <b>Keywords:</b> Mammography, Breast, Interval Cancers <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2026.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"e250559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.250559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.250559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨乳腺造影(CEM)阴性筛查后的间隔期癌率(ICR),并将间隔期癌(ICs)的特征与CEM筛查后肿瘤的特征进行比较。材料和方法本回顾性单机构研究包括2015年1月至2021年12月期间进行的连续筛查CEM检查。在CEM阴性筛查1年内诊断出的ic和所有CEM筛查检测到的癌症都被确定。两名乳腺放射科医生独立回顾了之前的阴性CEM检查,将ic分类为遗漏、误解或隐匿。使用连续变量的Wilcoxon秩和检验和分类变量的Fisher精确检验或χ2检验,比较ic和筛查检测到的癌症的患者和病变水平特征。结果本研究纳入2756例女性患者(中位年龄53岁,平均年龄47-60岁)的6911例CEM筛查检查。在6120例阴性筛查中,14例患者中诊断出14例ic。总体ICR为每1000次检查2.29例癌症,有症状的ICR为每1000次检查0.82例(6120例中的5例)。在所有诊断出的癌症(间隔和筛查检测)中,ic占13%(106例中的14例)。浸润性ic在中度或明显背景实质增强的情况下比筛查检测到的癌症更常见(8例中有6例,75% vs 57例中有17例,30%;P = 0.02)。大多数ic(10 / 14, 71%)在之前的筛查CEM中是隐匿的。结论CEM术后ICR为2.29例/ 1000例,占所有癌症诊断的13%。在之前的CEM中,大多数ic是隐匿的,与CEM筛查检测到的癌症相比,侵袭性ic更常与中度或显著的背景实质增强相关。关键词:乳房x线摄影,乳房,间隔期癌症本文有补充资料。©rsna, 2026。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interval Cancers after Negative Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography.

Purpose To determine the interval cancer rate (ICR) after negative screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and compare the characteristics of interval cancers (ICs) with those of CEM screen-detected cancers. Materials and Methods This retrospective, single-institution study included consecutive screening CEM examinations performed from January 2015 through December 2021. ICs diagnosed within 1 year of a negative screening CEM and all CEM screen-detected cancers were identified. Two breast radiologists independently reviewed prior negative CEM examinations to classify ICs as missed, misinterpreted, or occult. Patient- and lesion-level characteristics were compared between ICs and screen-detected cancers using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact or χ2 tests for categorical variables. Results The study included 6911 screening CEM examinations in 2756 female patients (median age, 53 years; IQR, 47-60 years). Among 6120 negative screening examinations, 14 ICs were diagnosed in 14 patients. The overall ICR was 2.29 cancers per 1000 examinations, and the symptomatic ICR was 0.82 per 1000 examinations (five of 6120). ICs accounted for 13% (14 of 106) of all cancers diagnosed (interval and screen detected). Invasive ICs occurred more frequently in the setting of moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement than screen-detected cancers (six of eight, 75% vs 17 of 57, 30%; P = .02). Most ICs (10 of 14, 71%) were occult on prior screening CEM. Conclusion The ICR after CEM was 2.29 cancers per 1000 examinations, representing 13% of all cancers diagnosed. Most ICs were occult at prior CEM, and invasive ICs were more frequently associated with moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement when compared with CEM screen-detected cancers. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Interval Cancers Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2026.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书