利用食物线索诱发神经成像来优化肥胖和暴食症的治疗。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kayla Flanagan, Luiza Bonfim Pacheco, Mengxia Gao, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia
{"title":"利用食物线索诱发神经成像来优化肥胖和暴食症的治疗。","authors":"Kayla Flanagan, Luiza Bonfim Pacheco, Mengxia Gao, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia","doi":"10.1007/s11154-026-10045-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity and binge eating disorder (BED) are global health concerns that share overlapping neural mechanisms. These include alterations in the brain's reward and control systems leading to heightened sensitivity to food cues and impaired self-regulation, which underpin overeating. Identifying neuroimaging-based biomarkers that index these mechanisms could advance individualised treatments. This scoping review examined evidence on fMRI food cue reactivity as a potential approach for developing predictive and response biomarkers relevant to the treatment of obesity and BED. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Embase (to July 2025) identified 57 eligible studies incorporating fMRI cue reactivity measures in the context of pharmacological, surgical, psychological, and lifestyle interventions. Of these, 7 reported predictive outcomes only (6 for adults with obesity and 1 for children and adolescents with obesity), 41 reported response outcomes only (36 for adults with obesity, 3 for children and adolescents with obesity and 2 for adults with binge eating), and 9 reported both predictive and response outcomes (8 for adults with obesity and 1 for adults with binge eating). Across paradigms and intervention modalities, there was consistent involvement of reward (striatum, insula, orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) and cognitive control regions (dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) as response outcomes from successful treatment. Reductions in reward-system reactivity following interventions were consistently associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting the potential of fMRI food cue reactivity as a candidate biomarker of treatment response. However, this finding is highly skewed towards obesity, given the limited number of studies that report results for BED (3 studies). Furthermore, consistent evidence for reliable predictive biomarkers was also limited, likely due to methodological variability and small sample sizes. Overall, this review supports the potential of response outcomes from fMRI food cue reactivity as an indicator of treatment efficacy in obesity and highlights the limited evidence in BED. We also emphasise the need for further standardisation of paradigms and biomarker validation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21106,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing food cue evoked neuroimaging towards treatment optimisation for obesity and binge eating disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla Flanagan, Luiza Bonfim Pacheco, Mengxia Gao, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11154-026-10045-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obesity and binge eating disorder (BED) are global health concerns that share overlapping neural mechanisms. These include alterations in the brain's reward and control systems leading to heightened sensitivity to food cues and impaired self-regulation, which underpin overeating. Identifying neuroimaging-based biomarkers that index these mechanisms could advance individualised treatments. This scoping review examined evidence on fMRI food cue reactivity as a potential approach for developing predictive and response biomarkers relevant to the treatment of obesity and BED. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Embase (to July 2025) identified 57 eligible studies incorporating fMRI cue reactivity measures in the context of pharmacological, surgical, psychological, and lifestyle interventions. Of these, 7 reported predictive outcomes only (6 for adults with obesity and 1 for children and adolescents with obesity), 41 reported response outcomes only (36 for adults with obesity, 3 for children and adolescents with obesity and 2 for adults with binge eating), and 9 reported both predictive and response outcomes (8 for adults with obesity and 1 for adults with binge eating). Across paradigms and intervention modalities, there was consistent involvement of reward (striatum, insula, orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) and cognitive control regions (dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) as response outcomes from successful treatment. Reductions in reward-system reactivity following interventions were consistently associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting the potential of fMRI food cue reactivity as a candidate biomarker of treatment response. However, this finding is highly skewed towards obesity, given the limited number of studies that report results for BED (3 studies). Furthermore, consistent evidence for reliable predictive biomarkers was also limited, likely due to methodological variability and small sample sizes. Overall, this review supports the potential of response outcomes from fMRI food cue reactivity as an indicator of treatment efficacy in obesity and highlights the limited evidence in BED. We also emphasise the need for further standardisation of paradigms and biomarker validation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-026-10045-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-026-10045-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖和暴食症(BED)是具有重叠神经机制的全球健康问题。其中包括大脑奖励和控制系统的改变,导致对食物线索的敏感度提高,自我调节能力受损,这是暴饮暴食的基础。识别神经成像为基础的生物标记物,索引这些机制可以推进个体化治疗。本综述研究了fMRI食物线索反应性作为开发与肥胖和BED治疗相关的预测性和反应性生物标志物的潜在方法的证据。系统检索MEDLINE、Scopus、PsycINFO和Embase(截至2025年7月),确定了57项纳入fMRI线索反应性测量的符合条件的研究,涉及药理学、外科、心理和生活方式干预。其中,7例仅报告了预测结果(肥胖成人6例,肥胖儿童和青少年1例),41例仅报告了反应结果(肥胖成人36例,肥胖儿童和青少年3例,暴饮暴食成人2例),9例同时报告了预测和反应结果(肥胖成人8例,暴饮暴食成人1例)。在各种模式和干预方式中,成功治疗后的反应结果一致涉及奖励区(纹状体、脑岛、眼窝额叶和腹内侧前额叶皮层)和认知控制区(背外侧和背内侧前额叶皮层)。干预后奖励系统反应性的降低与临床结果的改善一致相关,这支持了fMRI食物线索反应性作为治疗反应的候选生物标志物的潜力。然而,考虑到报告BED结果的研究数量有限(3项研究),这一发现高度偏向于肥胖。此外,可靠的预测性生物标志物的一致证据也有限,可能是由于方法的可变性和小样本量。总的来说,本综述支持fMRI食物线索反应性作为肥胖症治疗疗效指标的反应结果的潜力,并强调了BED的有限证据。我们还强调需要进一步标准化范例和生物标记物验证工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing food cue evoked neuroimaging towards treatment optimisation for obesity and binge eating disorder.

Obesity and binge eating disorder (BED) are global health concerns that share overlapping neural mechanisms. These include alterations in the brain's reward and control systems leading to heightened sensitivity to food cues and impaired self-regulation, which underpin overeating. Identifying neuroimaging-based biomarkers that index these mechanisms could advance individualised treatments. This scoping review examined evidence on fMRI food cue reactivity as a potential approach for developing predictive and response biomarkers relevant to the treatment of obesity and BED. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Embase (to July 2025) identified 57 eligible studies incorporating fMRI cue reactivity measures in the context of pharmacological, surgical, psychological, and lifestyle interventions. Of these, 7 reported predictive outcomes only (6 for adults with obesity and 1 for children and adolescents with obesity), 41 reported response outcomes only (36 for adults with obesity, 3 for children and adolescents with obesity and 2 for adults with binge eating), and 9 reported both predictive and response outcomes (8 for adults with obesity and 1 for adults with binge eating). Across paradigms and intervention modalities, there was consistent involvement of reward (striatum, insula, orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) and cognitive control regions (dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) as response outcomes from successful treatment. Reductions in reward-system reactivity following interventions were consistently associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting the potential of fMRI food cue reactivity as a candidate biomarker of treatment response. However, this finding is highly skewed towards obesity, given the limited number of studies that report results for BED (3 studies). Furthermore, consistent evidence for reliable predictive biomarkers was also limited, likely due to methodological variability and small sample sizes. Overall, this review supports the potential of response outcomes from fMRI food cue reactivity as an indicator of treatment efficacy in obesity and highlights the limited evidence in BED. We also emphasise the need for further standardisation of paradigms and biomarker validation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders
Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders is an international journal dedicated to the field of endocrinology and metabolism. It aims to provide the latest advancements in this rapidly advancing field to students, clinicians, and researchers. Unlike other journals, each quarterly issue of this review journal focuses on a specific topic and features ten to twelve articles written by world leaders in the field. These articles provide brief overviews of the latest developments, offering insights into both the basic aspects of the disease and its clinical implications. This format allows individuals in all areas of the field, including students, academic clinicians, and practicing clinicians, to understand the disease process and apply their knowledge to their specific areas of interest. The journal also includes selected readings and other essential references to encourage further in-depth exploration of specific topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书