用于分配医疗资源的道德议会工具。

IF 2.3 2区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-04-28 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70110

Hayley Clatterbuck, Bob Fischer, Arvo Muñoz Morán, Derek Shiller

{"title":"用于分配医疗资源的道德议会工具。","authors":"Hayley Clatterbuck, Bob Fischer, Arvo Muñoz Morán, Derek Shiller","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Moral Parliament Tool provides a framework for modeling participants' general moral views and simulating democratic deliberation among them. We show how the tool can be used to support democratic decisions about how to allocate healthcare resources. We apply the tool to three different bioethics case studies, showing how a hypothetical moral parliament composed of delegates of diverse worldviews would decide to distribute resources. This approach provides a more generalizable alternative to existing methods for participatory algorithm design.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":"40 9","pages":"1065-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Parliament Tool for Allocating Healthcare Resources\",\"authors\":\"Hayley Clatterbuck, Bob Fischer, Arvo Muñoz Morán, Derek Shiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bioe.70110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The Moral Parliament Tool provides a framework for modeling participants' general moral views and simulating democratic deliberation among them. We show how the tool can be used to support democratic decisions about how to allocate healthcare resources. We apply the tool to three different bioethics case studies, showing how a hypothetical moral parliament composed of delegates of diverse worldviews would decide to distribute resources. This approach provides a more generalizable alternative to existing methods for participatory algorithm design.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"40 9\",\"pages\":\"1065-1074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.70110\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.70110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

道德议会工具提供了一个框架来模拟参与者的一般道德观点，并模拟他们之间的民主审议。我们展示了如何使用该工具来支持关于如何分配医疗资源的民主决策。我们将该工具应用于三个不同的生物伦理学案例研究，展示了一个由不同世界观的代表组成的假想的道德议会将如何决定分配资源。这种方法为参与式算法设计提供了一种更通用的替代方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Moral Parliament Tool for Allocating Healthcare Resources

The Moral Parliament Tool provides a framework for modeling participants' general moral views and simulating democratic deliberation among them. We show how the tool can be used to support democratic decisions about how to allocate healthcare resources. We apply the tool to three different bioethics case studies, showing how a hypothetical moral parliament composed of delegates of diverse worldviews would decide to distribute resources. This approach provides a more generalizable alternative to existing methods for participatory algorithm design.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bioethics 医学-医学：伦理

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

9.10%

发文量

127

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.