Jérôme Munyangi Wa Nkola, Pierre Akilimali Zalagile, Hendrick Lukuke Mbutshu, Spartacus Kabala Munyemo, Imani Ramazani Bin Eradi, Alioune Camara
{"title":"将青蒿茶纳入简单疟疾治疗的公共卫生观点:刚果民主共和国马尼马Kalima地区卫生保健工作者的认知和可接受性的横断面研究。","authors":"Jérôme Munyangi Wa Nkola, Pierre Akilimali Zalagile, Hendrick Lukuke Mbutshu, Spartacus Kabala Munyemo, Imani Ramazani Bin Eradi, Alioune Camara","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed11040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Democratic Republic of the Congo accounts for approximately 12-13% of the global malaria burden. While international guidelines oppose the use of <i>Artemisia annua</i> infusions due to risks of sub-therapeutic dosing and resistance selection, the plant remains widely used in resource-limited regions. This study evaluates the clinical acceptability and perceptions of healthcare providers regarding the integration of <i>Artemisia annua</i> tea into formal malaria control in the Maniema province. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted among <b>337 healthcare professionals</b> in the Kalima health district using the KoboCollect digital platform. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify the primary socio-professional determinants of clinical acceptability. <b>Results:</b> The overall clinical acceptability of <i>Artemisia annua</i> integration <b>was 81.0%,</b> with <b>82.8%</b> of providers perceiving the preparation as effective. Rural residency was the strongest predictor of adherence <b>(AOR = 6.847; <i>p</i> = 0.003),</b> reflecting a pragmatic response to frequent ACT stockouts and high treatment costs. Despite high acceptability, <b>49.0%</b> of providers identified the lack of clinical evidence as a major barrier, and 91.4% demanded formal training on standardized dosage and biological mechanisms. <b>Conclusions:</b> A significant \"policy-practice gap\" exists between international guidelines and field realities in the DRC. Healthcare providers demonstrate high readiness for integration but emphasize the absolute necessity of galenic standardization to mitigate resistance risks. To address these concerns, a complementary genomic investigation is currently underway in the same study area, comparing <i>PfKelch13</i> mutation prevalence among <i>Artemisia</i> tea users versus ACT-treated patients. This molecular surveillance will provide essential evidence to define safety parameters for future phytopharmaceutical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23330,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13119536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Health Perspectives on Integrating <i>Artemisia annua</i> Tea for Uncomplicated Malaria Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Perceptions and Acceptability Among Healthcare Workers in Kalima District, Maniema, DRC.\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme Munyangi Wa Nkola, Pierre Akilimali Zalagile, Hendrick Lukuke Mbutshu, Spartacus Kabala Munyemo, Imani Ramazani Bin Eradi, Alioune Camara\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/tropicalmed11040105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Democratic Republic of the Congo accounts for approximately 12-13% of the global malaria burden. While international guidelines oppose the use of <i>Artemisia annua</i> infusions due to risks of sub-therapeutic dosing and resistance selection, the plant remains widely used in resource-limited regions. This study evaluates the clinical acceptability and perceptions of healthcare providers regarding the integration of <i>Artemisia annua</i> tea into formal malaria control in the Maniema province. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted among <b>337 healthcare professionals</b> in the Kalima health district using the KoboCollect digital platform. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify the primary socio-professional determinants of clinical acceptability. <b>Results:</b> The overall clinical acceptability of <i>Artemisia annua</i> integration <b>was 81.0%,</b> with <b>82.8%</b> of providers perceiving the preparation as effective. Rural residency was the strongest predictor of adherence <b>(AOR = 6.847; <i>p</i> = 0.003),</b> reflecting a pragmatic response to frequent ACT stockouts and high treatment costs. Despite high acceptability, <b>49.0%</b> of providers identified the lack of clinical evidence as a major barrier, and 91.4% demanded formal training on standardized dosage and biological mechanisms. <b>Conclusions:</b> A significant \\\"policy-practice gap\\\" exists between international guidelines and field realities in the DRC. Healthcare providers demonstrate high readiness for integration but emphasize the absolute necessity of galenic standardization to mitigate resistance risks. To address these concerns, a complementary genomic investigation is currently underway in the same study area, comparing <i>PfKelch13</i> mutation prevalence among <i>Artemisia</i> tea users versus ACT-treated patients. This molecular surveillance will provide essential evidence to define safety parameters for future phytopharmaceutical integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13119536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11040105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11040105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:刚果民主共和国约占全球疟疾负担的12-13%。尽管国际准则反对使用黄花蒿注射液,因为存在亚治疗剂量和耐药性选择的风险,但这种植物在资源有限的地区仍被广泛使用。本研究评估临床可接受性和卫生保健提供者的看法,将青蒿茶纳入马尼马省的正式疟疾控制。方法:采用KoboCollect数字平台对Kalima卫生区337名卫生保健专业人员进行横断面调查。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定临床可接受性的主要社会专业决定因素。结果:黄花蒿综合制剂的总体临床可接受度为81.0%,82.8%的提供者认为该制剂有效。农村居民是依从性最强的预测因子(AOR = 6.847; p = 0.003),反映了对ACT频繁缺药和高治疗费用的务实反应。尽管接受度很高,但49.0%的提供者认为缺乏临床证据是主要障碍,91.4%的提供者要求对标准化剂量和生物学机制进行正式培训。结论:在刚果民主共和国,国际指导方针与实地现实之间存在着重大的“政策实践差距”。医疗保健提供者表现出对整合的高度准备,但强调绝对有必要进行galenic标准化以减轻耐药性风险。为了解决这些问题,目前正在同一研究领域进行一项补充基因组调查,比较青蒿茶使用者与act治疗患者的PfKelch13突变流行率。这种分子监测将为确定未来植物药物整合的安全参数提供必要的证据。
Public Health Perspectives on Integrating Artemisia annua Tea for Uncomplicated Malaria Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Perceptions and Acceptability Among Healthcare Workers in Kalima District, Maniema, DRC.
Background: The Democratic Republic of the Congo accounts for approximately 12-13% of the global malaria burden. While international guidelines oppose the use of Artemisia annua infusions due to risks of sub-therapeutic dosing and resistance selection, the plant remains widely used in resource-limited regions. This study evaluates the clinical acceptability and perceptions of healthcare providers regarding the integration of Artemisia annua tea into formal malaria control in the Maniema province. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 337 healthcare professionals in the Kalima health district using the KoboCollect digital platform. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify the primary socio-professional determinants of clinical acceptability. Results: The overall clinical acceptability of Artemisia annua integration was 81.0%, with 82.8% of providers perceiving the preparation as effective. Rural residency was the strongest predictor of adherence (AOR = 6.847; p = 0.003), reflecting a pragmatic response to frequent ACT stockouts and high treatment costs. Despite high acceptability, 49.0% of providers identified the lack of clinical evidence as a major barrier, and 91.4% demanded formal training on standardized dosage and biological mechanisms. Conclusions: A significant "policy-practice gap" exists between international guidelines and field realities in the DRC. Healthcare providers demonstrate high readiness for integration but emphasize the absolute necessity of galenic standardization to mitigate resistance risks. To address these concerns, a complementary genomic investigation is currently underway in the same study area, comparing PfKelch13 mutation prevalence among Artemisia tea users versus ACT-treated patients. This molecular surveillance will provide essential evidence to define safety parameters for future phytopharmaceutical integration.