“就这样,安静”:对TikTok食物噪音视频的内容分析。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Daisuke Hayashi, Janelle Kort, Isabel M Robles-Martinez, Diana Orabueze, Katrina Bakhl, Travis D Masterson
{"title":"“就这样,安静”:对TikTok食物噪音视频的内容分析。","authors":"Daisuke Hayashi, Janelle Kort, Isabel M Robles-Martinez, Diana Orabueze, Katrina Bakhl, Travis D Masterson","doi":"10.1038/s41387-026-00423-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food Noise is a topic of growing interest in media, social media, and reports from patients and clinicians. A theoretical definition of \"Food Noise\" has recently been established as \"heightened and/or persistent manifestations of food cue reactivity, often leading to food-related intrusive thoughts and maladaptive eating behaviors,\" but research focusing on the lived experiences of people who report experiencing it is limited. TikTok has become a major outlet for content creators to disseminate information on Food Noise, with over 3600 videos under the hashtag #FoodNoise as of June 2024.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the top videos on TikTok under the hashtag \"FoodNoise\" and explore what content creators discuss around food noise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 100 videos on TikTok under the hashtag #FoodNoise. Video links and metadata (such as engagement metrics) were retrieved on June 24<sup>th</sup>, 2024. After one duplicated video was excluded, the final analysis included 99 videos. Following pilot testing of the codebook, we conducted a quantitative content analysis of the videos. This study required no ethical approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sampled videos had a mean of 1,173,323.63 views, 8,154.57 likes, 246.99 comments, and 582.65 shares. Content creators were primarily female (91.92%), aged 30 or older (82.83%), and White (85.86%). 22.22% of content creators were healthcare professionals, and 70.71% of videos were patient testimonies. 49.49% of videos mentioned medications, mainly GLP-1 receptor agonists. 42.42% mentioned food, mostly candies, desserts, and fast foods. Of the videos that defined Food Noise (82.82%), 93.9% defined it consistently with the current theoretical definition. Most videos (85.86%) depicted food noise negatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The top content available on TikTok on food noise is mainly comprised of patient testimonies that describe food noise as negative and distressful, and depict the use of medications, mostly GLP-1RAs, as a positive strategy to help manage food noise.</p>","PeriodicalId":19339,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"And just like that, quiet\\\": a content analysis of TikTok videos on food noise.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Hayashi, Janelle Kort, Isabel M Robles-Martinez, Diana Orabueze, Katrina Bakhl, Travis D Masterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41387-026-00423-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food Noise is a topic of growing interest in media, social media, and reports from patients and clinicians. A theoretical definition of \\\"Food Noise\\\" has recently been established as \\\"heightened and/or persistent manifestations of food cue reactivity, often leading to food-related intrusive thoughts and maladaptive eating behaviors,\\\" but research focusing on the lived experiences of people who report experiencing it is limited. TikTok has become a major outlet for content creators to disseminate information on Food Noise, with over 3600 videos under the hashtag #FoodNoise as of June 2024.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the top videos on TikTok under the hashtag \\\"FoodNoise\\\" and explore what content creators discuss around food noise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 100 videos on TikTok under the hashtag #FoodNoise. Video links and metadata (such as engagement metrics) were retrieved on June 24<sup>th</sup>, 2024. After one duplicated video was excluded, the final analysis included 99 videos. Following pilot testing of the codebook, we conducted a quantitative content analysis of the videos. This study required no ethical approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sampled videos had a mean of 1,173,323.63 views, 8,154.57 likes, 246.99 comments, and 582.65 shares. Content creators were primarily female (91.92%), aged 30 or older (82.83%), and White (85.86%). 22.22% of content creators were healthcare professionals, and 70.71% of videos were patient testimonies. 49.49% of videos mentioned medications, mainly GLP-1 receptor agonists. 42.42% mentioned food, mostly candies, desserts, and fast foods. Of the videos that defined Food Noise (82.82%), 93.9% defined it consistently with the current theoretical definition. Most videos (85.86%) depicted food noise negatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The top content available on TikTok on food noise is mainly comprised of patient testimonies that describe food noise as negative and distressful, and depict the use of medications, mostly GLP-1RAs, as a positive strategy to help manage food noise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-026-00423-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-026-00423-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食物噪音是媒体、社交媒体以及患者和临床医生越来越感兴趣的话题。“食物噪音”的理论定义最近被确立为“食物线索反应的增强和/或持续表现,通常导致与食物相关的侵入性想法和不适应的饮食行为”,但专注于报告经历过的人的生活经历的研究是有限的。截至2024年6月,TikTok已经成为内容创作者传播食物噪音信息的主要渠道,在#FoodNoise标签下有超过3600个视频。目的:本研究旨在研究TikTok上“食物噪音”标签下的热门视频,并探索内容创作者围绕食物噪音讨论了什么。方法:我们分析了TikTok上#食物噪音#标签下的100个视频。视频链接和元数据(如用户粘性指标)是在2024年6月24日检索的。在排除一个重复的视频后,最终的分析包括99个视频。在对密码本进行初步测试后,我们对视频进行了定量内容分析。这项研究不需要伦理批准。结果:采样视频的平均浏览量为1173,323.63次,点赞8,154.57次,评论246.99次,分享582.65次。内容创作者主要是女性(91.92%)、30岁以上(82.83%)和白人(85.86%)。22.22%的内容创作者为医疗专业人员,70.71%的视频为患者证词。49.49%的视频提到药物,主要是GLP-1受体激动剂。42.42%的人提到了食物,主要是糖果、甜点和快餐。在定义食物噪音的视频中(82.82%),93.9%的视频定义与目前的理论定义一致。大多数视频(85.86%)对食物噪音进行了负面描述。结论:TikTok上关于食物噪音的顶级内容主要由患者的证词组成,这些证词将食物噪音描述为负面和令人痛苦的,并描述了使用药物(主要是GLP-1RAs)作为帮助管理食物噪音的积极策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"And just like that, quiet": a content analysis of TikTok videos on food noise.

Background: Food Noise is a topic of growing interest in media, social media, and reports from patients and clinicians. A theoretical definition of "Food Noise" has recently been established as "heightened and/or persistent manifestations of food cue reactivity, often leading to food-related intrusive thoughts and maladaptive eating behaviors," but research focusing on the lived experiences of people who report experiencing it is limited. TikTok has become a major outlet for content creators to disseminate information on Food Noise, with over 3600 videos under the hashtag #FoodNoise as of June 2024.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the top videos on TikTok under the hashtag "FoodNoise" and explore what content creators discuss around food noise.

Methods: We analyzed 100 videos on TikTok under the hashtag #FoodNoise. Video links and metadata (such as engagement metrics) were retrieved on June 24th, 2024. After one duplicated video was excluded, the final analysis included 99 videos. Following pilot testing of the codebook, we conducted a quantitative content analysis of the videos. This study required no ethical approval.

Results: The sampled videos had a mean of 1,173,323.63 views, 8,154.57 likes, 246.99 comments, and 582.65 shares. Content creators were primarily female (91.92%), aged 30 or older (82.83%), and White (85.86%). 22.22% of content creators were healthcare professionals, and 70.71% of videos were patient testimonies. 49.49% of videos mentioned medications, mainly GLP-1 receptor agonists. 42.42% mentioned food, mostly candies, desserts, and fast foods. Of the videos that defined Food Noise (82.82%), 93.9% defined it consistently with the current theoretical definition. Most videos (85.86%) depicted food noise negatively.

Conclusion: The top content available on TikTok on food noise is mainly comprised of patient testimonies that describe food noise as negative and distressful, and depict the use of medications, mostly GLP-1RAs, as a positive strategy to help manage food noise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Diabetes
Nutrition & Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Diabetes is a peer-reviewed, online, open access journal bringing to the fore outstanding research in the areas of nutrition and chronic disease, including diabetes, from the molecular to the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书