{"title":"实施全球营养不良领导倡议框架,由注册营养师诊断营养不良:一个质量改进项目。","authors":"Stacy Pelekhaty, Alison Winter-Lai","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malnutrition presents a significant burden to healthcare organizations, and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite this, the frequency of malnutrition diagnosis remains far below known prevalence. Multiple validated frameworks for diagnosing malnutrition exist, the most recent being the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of the GLIM framework using a multi-disciplinary co-documentation process at one institution. Preimplementation analyses were conducted demonstrating wide discrepancy in frequency and severity of malnutrition diagnoses made by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and licensed independent practitioners in a one month period with minimal overlap. This was associated with coding capture in the lowest quartile compared with like organizations. Institutional support was obtained for a co-documentation process to include all required elements identified by the coding team. Nutrition leadership reviewed malnutrition frameworks and identified that transition to GLIM would streamline diagnosis in many cases. Education of RDNs focused on interprofessional collaboration and transition to the new framework. Post-implementation, monthly monitoring of co-signature rates on malnutrition notes improved from 72% initially to 90% one year after implementation. Coding capture of malnutrition diagnoses doubled from 4.8% of admissions in January of 2020 to 10% of admissions in mid 2021, increasing institutional performance to the median compared with like organizations. This has been sustained for over 5 years, as demonstrated by 2025 data, and denials remain low. Implementation of GLIM was well accepted by practicing RDNs and supported a collaborative process that improved multi-professional malnutrition documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition framework for diagnosing malnutrition by registered dietitians: A quality improvement project.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Pelekhaty, Alison Winter-Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.70129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malnutrition presents a significant burden to healthcare organizations, and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite this, the frequency of malnutrition diagnosis remains far below known prevalence. Multiple validated frameworks for diagnosing malnutrition exist, the most recent being the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of the GLIM framework using a multi-disciplinary co-documentation process at one institution. Preimplementation analyses were conducted demonstrating wide discrepancy in frequency and severity of malnutrition diagnoses made by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and licensed independent practitioners in a one month period with minimal overlap. This was associated with coding capture in the lowest quartile compared with like organizations. Institutional support was obtained for a co-documentation process to include all required elements identified by the coding team. Nutrition leadership reviewed malnutrition frameworks and identified that transition to GLIM would streamline diagnosis in many cases. Education of RDNs focused on interprofessional collaboration and transition to the new framework. Post-implementation, monthly monitoring of co-signature rates on malnutrition notes improved from 72% initially to 90% one year after implementation. Coding capture of malnutrition diagnoses doubled from 4.8% of admissions in January of 2020 to 10% of admissions in mid 2021, increasing institutional performance to the median compared with like organizations. This has been sustained for over 5 years, as demonstrated by 2025 data, and denials remain low. Implementation of GLIM was well accepted by practicing RDNs and supported a collaborative process that improved multi-professional malnutrition documentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition framework for diagnosing malnutrition by registered dietitians: A quality improvement project.
Malnutrition presents a significant burden to healthcare organizations, and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite this, the frequency of malnutrition diagnosis remains far below known prevalence. Multiple validated frameworks for diagnosing malnutrition exist, the most recent being the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of the GLIM framework using a multi-disciplinary co-documentation process at one institution. Preimplementation analyses were conducted demonstrating wide discrepancy in frequency and severity of malnutrition diagnoses made by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and licensed independent practitioners in a one month period with minimal overlap. This was associated with coding capture in the lowest quartile compared with like organizations. Institutional support was obtained for a co-documentation process to include all required elements identified by the coding team. Nutrition leadership reviewed malnutrition frameworks and identified that transition to GLIM would streamline diagnosis in many cases. Education of RDNs focused on interprofessional collaboration and transition to the new framework. Post-implementation, monthly monitoring of co-signature rates on malnutrition notes improved from 72% initially to 90% one year after implementation. Coding capture of malnutrition diagnoses doubled from 4.8% of admissions in January of 2020 to 10% of admissions in mid 2021, increasing institutional performance to the median compared with like organizations. This has been sustained for over 5 years, as demonstrated by 2025 data, and denials remain low. Implementation of GLIM was well accepted by practicing RDNs and supported a collaborative process that improved multi-professional malnutrition documentation.
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).