实施全球营养不良领导倡议框架,由注册营养师诊断营养不良:一个质量改进项目。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Stacy Pelekhaty, Alison Winter-Lai
{"title":"实施全球营养不良领导倡议框架,由注册营养师诊断营养不良:一个质量改进项目。","authors":"Stacy Pelekhaty, Alison Winter-Lai","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malnutrition presents a significant burden to healthcare organizations, and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite this, the frequency of malnutrition diagnosis remains far below known prevalence. Multiple validated frameworks for diagnosing malnutrition exist, the most recent being the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of the GLIM framework using a multi-disciplinary co-documentation process at one institution. Preimplementation analyses were conducted demonstrating wide discrepancy in frequency and severity of malnutrition diagnoses made by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and licensed independent practitioners in a one month period with minimal overlap. This was associated with coding capture in the lowest quartile compared with like organizations. Institutional support was obtained for a co-documentation process to include all required elements identified by the coding team. Nutrition leadership reviewed malnutrition frameworks and identified that transition to GLIM would streamline diagnosis in many cases. Education of RDNs focused on interprofessional collaboration and transition to the new framework. Post-implementation, monthly monitoring of co-signature rates on malnutrition notes improved from 72% initially to 90% one year after implementation. Coding capture of malnutrition diagnoses doubled from 4.8% of admissions in January of 2020 to 10% of admissions in mid 2021, increasing institutional performance to the median compared with like organizations. This has been sustained for over 5 years, as demonstrated by 2025 data, and denials remain low. Implementation of GLIM was well accepted by practicing RDNs and supported a collaborative process that improved multi-professional malnutrition documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition framework for diagnosing malnutrition by registered dietitians: A quality improvement project.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Pelekhaty, Alison Winter-Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.70129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malnutrition presents a significant burden to healthcare organizations, and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite this, the frequency of malnutrition diagnosis remains far below known prevalence. Multiple validated frameworks for diagnosing malnutrition exist, the most recent being the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of the GLIM framework using a multi-disciplinary co-documentation process at one institution. Preimplementation analyses were conducted demonstrating wide discrepancy in frequency and severity of malnutrition diagnoses made by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and licensed independent practitioners in a one month period with minimal overlap. This was associated with coding capture in the lowest quartile compared with like organizations. Institutional support was obtained for a co-documentation process to include all required elements identified by the coding team. Nutrition leadership reviewed malnutrition frameworks and identified that transition to GLIM would streamline diagnosis in many cases. Education of RDNs focused on interprofessional collaboration and transition to the new framework. Post-implementation, monthly monitoring of co-signature rates on malnutrition notes improved from 72% initially to 90% one year after implementation. Coding capture of malnutrition diagnoses doubled from 4.8% of admissions in January of 2020 to 10% of admissions in mid 2021, increasing institutional performance to the median compared with like organizations. This has been sustained for over 5 years, as demonstrated by 2025 data, and denials remain low. Implementation of GLIM was well accepted by practicing RDNs and supported a collaborative process that improved multi-professional malnutrition documentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

营养不良给医疗机构带来了沉重的负担,并使临床结果恶化。尽管如此,营养不良诊断的频率仍然远低于已知的流行率。目前存在多种诊断营养不良的有效框架,最近的是全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)。本文的目的是描述在一个机构中使用多学科共同文档流程实现GLIM框架。实施前分析表明,注册营养师和有执照的独立医生在一个月内诊断的营养不良的频率和严重程度存在很大差异,但重叠很少。与同类组织相比,这与编码捕获的最低四分位数有关。为共同文件编制过程获得了机构支持,以包括编码小组确定的所有必要元素。营养领导审查了营养不良框架,并确定过渡到GLIM将简化许多情况下的诊断。rdn的教育侧重于跨专业协作和向新框架的过渡。实施后,营养不良说明共同签字率的月度监测从最初的72%提高到实施一年后的90%。营养不良诊断的编码捕获从2020年1月的4.8%增加到2021年中期的10%,与同类组织相比,机构绩效提高到中位数。正如2025年的数据所显示的那样,这种情况已持续了5年多,拒绝率仍然很低。实施GLIM已被实践的rdn所接受,并支持了一个改进多专业营养不良记录的协作过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition framework for diagnosing malnutrition by registered dietitians: A quality improvement project.

Malnutrition presents a significant burden to healthcare organizations, and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite this, the frequency of malnutrition diagnosis remains far below known prevalence. Multiple validated frameworks for diagnosing malnutrition exist, the most recent being the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). The purpose of this article is to describe the implementation of the GLIM framework using a multi-disciplinary co-documentation process at one institution. Preimplementation analyses were conducted demonstrating wide discrepancy in frequency and severity of malnutrition diagnoses made by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) and licensed independent practitioners in a one month period with minimal overlap. This was associated with coding capture in the lowest quartile compared with like organizations. Institutional support was obtained for a co-documentation process to include all required elements identified by the coding team. Nutrition leadership reviewed malnutrition frameworks and identified that transition to GLIM would streamline diagnosis in many cases. Education of RDNs focused on interprofessional collaboration and transition to the new framework. Post-implementation, monthly monitoring of co-signature rates on malnutrition notes improved from 72% initially to 90% one year after implementation. Coding capture of malnutrition diagnoses doubled from 4.8% of admissions in January of 2020 to 10% of admissions in mid 2021, increasing institutional performance to the median compared with like organizations. This has been sustained for over 5 years, as demonstrated by 2025 data, and denials remain low. Implementation of GLIM was well accepted by practicing RDNs and supported a collaborative process that improved multi-professional malnutrition documentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书