{"title":"后haart时代卫生保健工作者中艾滋病毒的流行-系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Roland Diel, Albert Nienhaus","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at potential risk of HIV infection through occupational exposure. However, with the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), universal precautions, and post-exposure prophylaxis, the global risk profile has changed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study synthesized data on HIV prevalence among HCWs worldwide to assess current epidemiological patterns and to evaluate regional heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting serological evidence of HIV infection among HCWs published between 1996 and September 2025, corresponding to the post-HAART era. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, and the number of HIV-positive cases. Prevalence estimates were compared with internal control groups or with national background prevalence data obtained from UNAIDS. Methodological quality was assessed using the Westermann score. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled HIV prevalence by WHO region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 220 studies identified, 14 from 12 countries met inclusion criteria. Across 7,705 HCWs tested, the overall pooled HIV prevalence was 0.68% (95% CI 0.19-2.46) with extreme heterogeneity (I²=94.3%, τ²=5.003). Whilst the pooled prevalence among HCWs in Sub-Saharan Africa was 7.1% (95 % CI 3.3-12.7), all other regions-Europe, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean-showed pooled prevalences of 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-3.7), with no HIV-positive HCWs detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIV infection among HCWs is now exceedingly rare worldwide, with elevated prevalence confined to high-endemic African regions as a regional dichotomy. The findings indicate that HIV infection in HCWs is primarily driven by community transmission rather than occupational exposure and highlight the success of infection-control policies and ART expansion in eliminating workplace transmission. Sustained surveillance and equitable access to protective equipment and post-exposure prophylaxis remain essential to preserve this major occupational-health achievement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"21 ","pages":"Doc25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13103531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of HIV among healthcare workers in the post-HAART era - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Roland Diel, Albert Nienhaus\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/dgkh000634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at potential risk of HIV infection through occupational exposure. However, with the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), universal precautions, and post-exposure prophylaxis, the global risk profile has changed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study synthesized data on HIV prevalence among HCWs worldwide to assess current epidemiological patterns and to evaluate regional heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting serological evidence of HIV infection among HCWs published between 1996 and September 2025, corresponding to the post-HAART era. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, and the number of HIV-positive cases. Prevalence estimates were compared with internal control groups or with national background prevalence data obtained from UNAIDS. Methodological quality was assessed using the Westermann score. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled HIV prevalence by WHO region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 220 studies identified, 14 from 12 countries met inclusion criteria. Across 7,705 HCWs tested, the overall pooled HIV prevalence was 0.68% (95% CI 0.19-2.46) with extreme heterogeneity (I²=94.3%, τ²=5.003). Whilst the pooled prevalence among HCWs in Sub-Saharan Africa was 7.1% (95 % CI 3.3-12.7), all other regions-Europe, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean-showed pooled prevalences of 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-3.7), with no HIV-positive HCWs detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIV infection among HCWs is now exceedingly rare worldwide, with elevated prevalence confined to high-endemic African regions as a regional dichotomy. The findings indicate that HIV infection in HCWs is primarily driven by community transmission rather than occupational exposure and highlight the success of infection-control policies and ART expansion in eliminating workplace transmission. Sustained surveillance and equitable access to protective equipment and post-exposure prophylaxis remain essential to preserve this major occupational-health achievement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Doc25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13103531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:卫生保健工作者(HCWs)有通过职业暴露感染HIV的潜在风险。然而,随着高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)、普遍预防措施和暴露后预防的出现,全球风险概况发生了变化。目的:本研究综合了全球卫生保健工作者中艾滋病毒流行情况的数据,以评估当前的流行病学模式并评估区域异质性。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们系统地检索PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆,检索1996年至2025年9月期间发表的报告HCWs中HIV感染的血清学证据的研究,对应于haart后时代。提取有关研究设计、样本量和hiv阳性病例数的数据。患病率估计值与内部控制组或从联合国艾滋病规划署获得的国家背景患病率数据进行比较。采用Westermann评分评估方法学质量。进行随机效应荟萃分析以估计WHO区域的艾滋病毒流行率。结果:在确定的220项研究中,来自12个国家的14项研究符合纳入标准。在接受检测的7705名医护人员中,艾滋病毒总流行率为0.68% (95% CI 0.19-2.46),具有极端异质性(I²=94.3%,τ²=5.003)。虽然撒哈拉以南非洲地区卫生保健工作者的总患病率为7.1% (95% CI 3.3-12.7),但所有其他地区(欧洲、拉丁美洲和东地中海)的总患病率为0.0% (95% CI 0.0-3.7),未检测到艾滋病毒阳性卫生保健工作者。结论:艾滋病毒感染在卫生保健工作者中现在在世界范围内是极其罕见的,高流行率仅限于高流行的非洲地区,这是一个区域二分法。研究结果表明,卫生保健中心的艾滋病毒感染主要是由社区传播而不是职业暴露驱动的,并强调了感染控制政策和扩大抗逆转录病毒治疗在消除工作场所传播方面的成功。持续监测和公平获得防护设备和接触后预防仍然是保持这一重大职业健康成就的关键。
Prevalence of HIV among healthcare workers in the post-HAART era - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at potential risk of HIV infection through occupational exposure. However, with the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), universal precautions, and post-exposure prophylaxis, the global risk profile has changed.
Objective: This study synthesized data on HIV prevalence among HCWs worldwide to assess current epidemiological patterns and to evaluate regional heterogeneity.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting serological evidence of HIV infection among HCWs published between 1996 and September 2025, corresponding to the post-HAART era. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, and the number of HIV-positive cases. Prevalence estimates were compared with internal control groups or with national background prevalence data obtained from UNAIDS. Methodological quality was assessed using the Westermann score. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled HIV prevalence by WHO region.
Results: Of 220 studies identified, 14 from 12 countries met inclusion criteria. Across 7,705 HCWs tested, the overall pooled HIV prevalence was 0.68% (95% CI 0.19-2.46) with extreme heterogeneity (I²=94.3%, τ²=5.003). Whilst the pooled prevalence among HCWs in Sub-Saharan Africa was 7.1% (95 % CI 3.3-12.7), all other regions-Europe, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean-showed pooled prevalences of 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-3.7), with no HIV-positive HCWs detected.
Conclusions: HIV infection among HCWs is now exceedingly rare worldwide, with elevated prevalence confined to high-endemic African regions as a regional dichotomy. The findings indicate that HIV infection in HCWs is primarily driven by community transmission rather than occupational exposure and highlight the success of infection-control policies and ART expansion in eliminating workplace transmission. Sustained surveillance and equitable access to protective equipment and post-exposure prophylaxis remain essential to preserve this major occupational-health achievement.