系统动态心电图监测预防TAVR后危及生命的心血管事件。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Quentin Fischer, Isabelle Nault, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Marisa Avvedimento, Carla Benavent-Garcia, Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont, François Philippon, Josep Rodés-Cabau
{"title":"系统动态心电图监测预防TAVR后危及生命的心血管事件。","authors":"Quentin Fischer, Isabelle Nault, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Marisa Avvedimento, Carla Benavent-Garcia, Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont, François Philippon, Josep Rodés-Cabau","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring has been assessed after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), its impact on life-threatening cardiovascular events remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether systematic AECG monitoring after TAVR reduces life-threatening cardiovascular events during the first year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 1217 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR and were discharged without a permanent pacemaker. Of these, 211 consecutive patients received systematic 14-day AECG monitoring at discharge as part of the RECORD registry. The remaining 1006 patients who underwent TAVR within the 3 years before and after the registry period without systematic AECG monitoring constituted the control group. The primary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death, syncope/presyncope due to symptomatic arrhythmias, or stroke at 1-year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between groups, except for a higher use of self-expandable valves in the control group (<i>P</i>=0.005). Systematic AECG monitoring was associated with a lower incidence of the primary end point (1.9% versus 6.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27 [0.10-0.74]; <i>P</i>=0.011), mainly driven by a lower rate of sudden death or arrhythmic syncope/presyncope (0.9% versus 4.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22 [0.05-0.89]; <i>P</i>=0.034). All sudden death cases occurred in the control group, at a median of 96 (33-235) days after TAVR. New-onset atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 8.9% of the systematic AECG patients (versus 1.8% in the control group; adjusted hazard ratio, 5.31 [2.47-11.38]; <i>P</i><0.001), leading to new oral anticoagulation in 71.4% of cases. Stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation rates at 1 year were similar between groups, although permanent pacemaker implantation occurred earlier in the AECG group (25 versus 104 days; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic AECG monitoring after TAVR enables earlier detection of severe arrhythmias and is associated with fewer life-threatening cardiovascular events within 1 year. These findings support the need for a randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04298593.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e016288"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Ambulatory ECG Monitoring for Preventing Life-Threatening Cardiovascular Events Following TAVR.\",\"authors\":\"Quentin Fischer, Isabelle Nault, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Marisa Avvedimento, Carla Benavent-Garcia, Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont, François Philippon, Josep Rodés-Cabau\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring has been assessed after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), its impact on life-threatening cardiovascular events remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether systematic AECG monitoring after TAVR reduces life-threatening cardiovascular events during the first year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 1217 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR and were discharged without a permanent pacemaker. Of these, 211 consecutive patients received systematic 14-day AECG monitoring at discharge as part of the RECORD registry. The remaining 1006 patients who underwent TAVR within the 3 years before and after the registry period without systematic AECG monitoring constituted the control group. The primary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death, syncope/presyncope due to symptomatic arrhythmias, or stroke at 1-year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between groups, except for a higher use of self-expandable valves in the control group (<i>P</i>=0.005). Systematic AECG monitoring was associated with a lower incidence of the primary end point (1.9% versus 6.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27 [0.10-0.74]; <i>P</i>=0.011), mainly driven by a lower rate of sudden death or arrhythmic syncope/presyncope (0.9% versus 4.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22 [0.05-0.89]; <i>P</i>=0.034). All sudden death cases occurred in the control group, at a median of 96 (33-235) days after TAVR. New-onset atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 8.9% of the systematic AECG patients (versus 1.8% in the control group; adjusted hazard ratio, 5.31 [2.47-11.38]; <i>P</i><0.001), leading to new oral anticoagulation in 71.4% of cases. Stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation rates at 1 year were similar between groups, although permanent pacemaker implantation occurred earlier in the AECG group (25 versus 104 days; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic AECG monitoring after TAVR enables earlier detection of severe arrhythmias and is associated with fewer life-threatening cardiovascular events within 1 year. These findings support the need for a randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04298593.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e016288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016288\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的动态心电图(AECG)监测已被评估,但其对危及生命的心血管事件的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估TAVR术后系统AECG监测是否能在随访的第一年减少危及生命的心血管事件。方法:本研究纳入1217例连续接受TAVR且出院时未使用永久性起搏器的患者。其中,211名连续患者在出院时接受了系统的14天AECG监测,作为RECORD登记的一部分。其余1006例在登记期前后3年内行TAVR且无系统AECG监测的患者为对照组。主要终点是心源性猝死、因症状性心律失常引起的晕厥/晕厥前症或1年时中风的复合终点。结果:两组之间的基线和手术特征相似,除了对照组使用自膨胀瓣膜的比例较高(P=0.005)。系统AECG监测与主要终点发生率较低相关(1.9% vs . 6.6%;校正风险比为0.27 [0.10-0.74];P=0.011),主要是由于猝死或心律失常晕厥/晕厥前期发生率较低(0.9% vs . 4.0%;校正风险比为0.22 [0.05-0.89];P=0.034)。所有猝死病例均发生在对照组,中位时间为TAVR后96(33-235)天。8.9%的系统AECG患者诊断为新发房颤(对照组为1.8%),调整后的风险比为5.31[2.47-11.38]。结论:TAVR术后系统AECG监测可早期发现严重心律失常,1年内危及生命的心血管事件较少。这些发现支持进行随机试验的必要性。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04298593。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Ambulatory ECG Monitoring for Preventing Life-Threatening Cardiovascular Events Following TAVR.

Background: Although ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring has been assessed after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), its impact on life-threatening cardiovascular events remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether systematic AECG monitoring after TAVR reduces life-threatening cardiovascular events during the first year of follow-up.

Methods: The study included 1217 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR and were discharged without a permanent pacemaker. Of these, 211 consecutive patients received systematic 14-day AECG monitoring at discharge as part of the RECORD registry. The remaining 1006 patients who underwent TAVR within the 3 years before and after the registry period without systematic AECG monitoring constituted the control group. The primary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death, syncope/presyncope due to symptomatic arrhythmias, or stroke at 1-year.

Results: Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between groups, except for a higher use of self-expandable valves in the control group (P=0.005). Systematic AECG monitoring was associated with a lower incidence of the primary end point (1.9% versus 6.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27 [0.10-0.74]; P=0.011), mainly driven by a lower rate of sudden death or arrhythmic syncope/presyncope (0.9% versus 4.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22 [0.05-0.89]; P=0.034). All sudden death cases occurred in the control group, at a median of 96 (33-235) days after TAVR. New-onset atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 8.9% of the systematic AECG patients (versus 1.8% in the control group; adjusted hazard ratio, 5.31 [2.47-11.38]; P<0.001), leading to new oral anticoagulation in 71.4% of cases. Stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation rates at 1 year were similar between groups, although permanent pacemaker implantation occurred earlier in the AECG group (25 versus 104 days; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Systematic AECG monitoring after TAVR enables earlier detection of severe arrhythmias and is associated with fewer life-threatening cardiovascular events within 1 year. These findings support the need for a randomized trial.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04298593.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书