Brett T Litz, Hannah E Walker, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem, Zoe R Styler, Elliot Fielstein, Benjamin Darnell, Keith G Meador, Jason A Nieuwsma
{"title":"在退伍军人事务部行为健康设置中建立道德伤害结果量表的临床显著变化基准。","authors":"Brett T Litz, Hannah E Walker, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem, Zoe R Styler, Elliot Fielstein, Benjamin Darnell, Keith G Meador, Jason A Nieuwsma","doi":"10.1177/10731911261436687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to establish benchmarks for clinically significant change for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) using national data from Veterans treated in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health settings. We analyzed archival electronic health record data from 2,521 Veterans administered the MIOS between July 2022 and March 2025. A subset of 361 Veterans who completed at least two MIOS administrations within 4 months constituted the episode-of-care cohort. Reliable change indices (RCIs) and functional recovery thresholds were calculated using the Jacobson and Truax method. A change score of 13 points on the MIOS indicated clinically significant improvement and the critical value suggesting functional recovery for endpoint scores was ≤9. Most Veterans were unchanged (81%), with 11.9% showing reliable improvement, 4.2% probable recovery, and 2.8% deterioration. In the larger cohort, nearly half met the criterion for probable moral injury. MIOS administration was most common in general mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specialty care clinics. These initial findings provide the first clinically significant change benchmarks for the MIOS, supporting its integration into measurement-based care and routine outcome monitoring for moral injury in Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911261436687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Clinically Significant Change Benchmarks for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale in VA Behavioral Health Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Brett T Litz, Hannah E Walker, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem, Zoe R Styler, Elliot Fielstein, Benjamin Darnell, Keith G Meador, Jason A Nieuwsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911261436687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to establish benchmarks for clinically significant change for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) using national data from Veterans treated in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health settings. We analyzed archival electronic health record data from 2,521 Veterans administered the MIOS between July 2022 and March 2025. A subset of 361 Veterans who completed at least two MIOS administrations within 4 months constituted the episode-of-care cohort. Reliable change indices (RCIs) and functional recovery thresholds were calculated using the Jacobson and Truax method. A change score of 13 points on the MIOS indicated clinically significant improvement and the critical value suggesting functional recovery for endpoint scores was ≤9. Most Veterans were unchanged (81%), with 11.9% showing reliable improvement, 4.2% probable recovery, and 2.8% deterioration. In the larger cohort, nearly half met the criterion for probable moral injury. MIOS administration was most common in general mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specialty care clinics. These initial findings provide the first clinically significant change benchmarks for the MIOS, supporting its integration into measurement-based care and routine outcome monitoring for moral injury in Veterans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911261436687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261436687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261436687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishing Clinically Significant Change Benchmarks for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale in VA Behavioral Health Settings.
This study aimed to establish benchmarks for clinically significant change for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) using national data from Veterans treated in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health settings. We analyzed archival electronic health record data from 2,521 Veterans administered the MIOS between July 2022 and March 2025. A subset of 361 Veterans who completed at least two MIOS administrations within 4 months constituted the episode-of-care cohort. Reliable change indices (RCIs) and functional recovery thresholds were calculated using the Jacobson and Truax method. A change score of 13 points on the MIOS indicated clinically significant improvement and the critical value suggesting functional recovery for endpoint scores was ≤9. Most Veterans were unchanged (81%), with 11.9% showing reliable improvement, 4.2% probable recovery, and 2.8% deterioration. In the larger cohort, nearly half met the criterion for probable moral injury. MIOS administration was most common in general mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specialty care clinics. These initial findings provide the first clinically significant change benchmarks for the MIOS, supporting its integration into measurement-based care and routine outcome monitoring for moral injury in Veterans.
期刊介绍:
Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.