在退伍军人事务部行为健康设置中建立道德伤害结果量表的临床显著变化基准。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Brett T Litz, Hannah E Walker, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem, Zoe R Styler, Elliot Fielstein, Benjamin Darnell, Keith G Meador, Jason A Nieuwsma
{"title":"在退伍军人事务部行为健康设置中建立道德伤害结果量表的临床显著变化基准。","authors":"Brett T Litz, Hannah E Walker, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem, Zoe R Styler, Elliot Fielstein, Benjamin Darnell, Keith G Meador, Jason A Nieuwsma","doi":"10.1177/10731911261436687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to establish benchmarks for clinically significant change for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) using national data from Veterans treated in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health settings. We analyzed archival electronic health record data from 2,521 Veterans administered the MIOS between July 2022 and March 2025. A subset of 361 Veterans who completed at least two MIOS administrations within 4 months constituted the episode-of-care cohort. Reliable change indices (RCIs) and functional recovery thresholds were calculated using the Jacobson and Truax method. A change score of 13 points on the MIOS indicated clinically significant improvement and the critical value suggesting functional recovery for endpoint scores was ≤9. Most Veterans were unchanged (81%), with 11.9% showing reliable improvement, 4.2% probable recovery, and 2.8% deterioration. In the larger cohort, nearly half met the criterion for probable moral injury. MIOS administration was most common in general mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specialty care clinics. These initial findings provide the first clinically significant change benchmarks for the MIOS, supporting its integration into measurement-based care and routine outcome monitoring for moral injury in Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911261436687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Clinically Significant Change Benchmarks for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale in VA Behavioral Health Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Brett T Litz, Hannah E Walker, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem, Zoe R Styler, Elliot Fielstein, Benjamin Darnell, Keith G Meador, Jason A Nieuwsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911261436687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to establish benchmarks for clinically significant change for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) using national data from Veterans treated in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health settings. We analyzed archival electronic health record data from 2,521 Veterans administered the MIOS between July 2022 and March 2025. A subset of 361 Veterans who completed at least two MIOS administrations within 4 months constituted the episode-of-care cohort. Reliable change indices (RCIs) and functional recovery thresholds were calculated using the Jacobson and Truax method. A change score of 13 points on the MIOS indicated clinically significant improvement and the critical value suggesting functional recovery for endpoint scores was ≤9. Most Veterans were unchanged (81%), with 11.9% showing reliable improvement, 4.2% probable recovery, and 2.8% deterioration. In the larger cohort, nearly half met the criterion for probable moral injury. MIOS administration was most common in general mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specialty care clinics. These initial findings provide the first clinically significant change benchmarks for the MIOS, supporting its integration into measurement-based care and routine outcome monitoring for moral injury in Veterans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911261436687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261436687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261436687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)行为健康机构接受治疗的退伍军人的国家数据,为道德伤害结局量表(MIOS)的临床显著变化建立基准。我们分析了在2022年7月至2025年3月期间管理MIOS的2521名退伍军人的档案电子健康记录数据。在4个月内完成至少两次MIOS治疗的361名退伍军人组成护理期队列。采用Jacobson和Truax方法计算可靠变化指数(rci)和功能恢复阈值。MIOS变化评分为13分表示临床显著改善,终点评分提示功能恢复的临界值≤9分。大多数退伍军人没有变化(81%),11.9%表现出可靠的改善,4.2%可能恢复,2.8%恶化。在更大的队列中,近一半的人符合可能的道德伤害标准。MIOS管理在一般精神健康和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)专科护理诊所最常见。这些初步发现为MIOS提供了第一个具有临床意义的变化基准,支持其整合到退伍军人精神损伤的基于测量的护理和常规结果监测中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing Clinically Significant Change Benchmarks for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale in VA Behavioral Health Settings.

This study aimed to establish benchmarks for clinically significant change for the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) using national data from Veterans treated in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health settings. We analyzed archival electronic health record data from 2,521 Veterans administered the MIOS between July 2022 and March 2025. A subset of 361 Veterans who completed at least two MIOS administrations within 4 months constituted the episode-of-care cohort. Reliable change indices (RCIs) and functional recovery thresholds were calculated using the Jacobson and Truax method. A change score of 13 points on the MIOS indicated clinically significant improvement and the critical value suggesting functional recovery for endpoint scores was ≤9. Most Veterans were unchanged (81%), with 11.9% showing reliable improvement, 4.2% probable recovery, and 2.8% deterioration. In the larger cohort, nearly half met the criterion for probable moral injury. MIOS administration was most common in general mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specialty care clinics. These initial findings provide the first clinically significant change benchmarks for the MIOS, supporting its integration into measurement-based care and routine outcome monitoring for moral injury in Veterans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书