乳腺癌检测中心及病例对照筛查效果研究

Neil Dubin, Dana R. Friedman, Paolo G. Toniolo, Bernard S. Pasternack
{"title":"乳腺癌检测中心及病例对照筛查效果研究","authors":"Neil Dubin,&nbsp;Dana R. Friedman,&nbsp;Paolo G. Toniolo,&nbsp;Bernard S. Pasternack","doi":"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90118-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Case-control studies of screening efficacy have been proposed as a cost- and timeefficient alternative to randomized controlled trials. Possible source populations for such retrospective studies of breast cancer screening are considered, including women from (i) pre-existing randomized trials, (ii) non-experimental population-based studies and (iii) detection centers. On practical grounds women attending detection centers are seen to comprise the most readily accessible source of adequate numbers of cases and controls. Potential biases are addressed, involving incomplete case ascertainment, self-selection, and different screening recommendations. Data from the Guttman Breast Diagnostic Institute are used for illustration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chronic diseases","volume":"40 11","pages":"Pages 1041-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90118-4","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer detection centers and case-control studies of the efficacy of screening\",\"authors\":\"Neil Dubin,&nbsp;Dana R. Friedman,&nbsp;Paolo G. Toniolo,&nbsp;Bernard S. Pasternack\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90118-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Case-control studies of screening efficacy have been proposed as a cost- and timeefficient alternative to randomized controlled trials. Possible source populations for such retrospective studies of breast cancer screening are considered, including women from (i) pre-existing randomized trials, (ii) non-experimental population-based studies and (iii) detection centers. On practical grounds women attending detection centers are seen to comprise the most readily accessible source of adequate numbers of cases and controls. Potential biases are addressed, involving incomplete case ascertainment, self-selection, and different screening recommendations. Data from the Guttman Breast Diagnostic Institute are used for illustration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"volume\":\"40 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1041-1050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90118-4\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187901184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chronic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187901184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

筛选效果的病例对照研究已被提议作为一种成本和时间效率高的随机对照试验替代方案。考虑此类乳腺癌筛查回顾性研究的可能源人群,包括来自(i)预先存在的随机试验、(ii)非实验性人群研究和(iii)检测中心的妇女。从实际的角度来看,到检测中心就诊的妇女被认为是最容易获得足够数量病例和控制的来源。潜在的偏见被解决,包括不完整的病例确定,自我选择和不同的筛选建议。本文使用了Guttman乳腺诊断研究所的数据作为说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast cancer detection centers and case-control studies of the efficacy of screening

Case-control studies of screening efficacy have been proposed as a cost- and timeefficient alternative to randomized controlled trials. Possible source populations for such retrospective studies of breast cancer screening are considered, including women from (i) pre-existing randomized trials, (ii) non-experimental population-based studies and (iii) detection centers. On practical grounds women attending detection centers are seen to comprise the most readily accessible source of adequate numbers of cases and controls. Potential biases are addressed, involving incomplete case ascertainment, self-selection, and different screening recommendations. Data from the Guttman Breast Diagnostic Institute are used for illustration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信