了解平台安全技术对减少网络危害的作用

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jonathan Bright, Florence E. Enock, Pica Johansson, Francesca Stevens, Helen Z. Margetts
{"title":"了解平台安全技术对减少网络危害的作用","authors":"Jonathan Bright, Florence E. Enock, Pica Johansson, Francesca Stevens, Helen Z. Margetts","doi":"10.1177/20563051261431383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User-facing ‘platform safety technology’ encompasses an array of tools offered by social media platforms to help people protect themselves from harm, for example allowing people to report content or block other users. These tools are an increasingly important part of online safety; however, little is known about how users engage with them. We present findings from a nationally representative survey of UK adults examining their experiences with online harms and safety technologies. The results show that online harm is widespread: 67% of respondents report having encountered harmful content online. Among those who are aware of safety tools, over 80% have used at least one, indicating high uptake when knowledge of the tools is present. Awareness of specific tools is varied, with people more aware of ‘post hoc’ safety tools, taken in response to harm exposure (such as reporting or blocking), than preventive measures (such as altering feed algorithms). However, satisfaction with safety technologies is generally low. People who have previously seen online harms are more likely to use safety tools, implying a ‘learning the hard way’ route to engagement. Those higher in digital literacy are also more likely to use some of these tools, raising concerns about the accessibility of these technologies. In addition, women are more likely to engage in particular types of online ‘safety work’. These findings have significant implications for platform designers, regulators, researchers and policymakers seeking to create a safer and more equitable online environment.","PeriodicalId":47920,"journal":{"name":"Social Media + Society","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Engagement With Platform Safety Technology for Reducing Exposure to Online Harms\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Bright, Florence E. Enock, Pica Johansson, Francesca Stevens, Helen Z. Margetts\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20563051261431383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"User-facing ‘platform safety technology’ encompasses an array of tools offered by social media platforms to help people protect themselves from harm, for example allowing people to report content or block other users. These tools are an increasingly important part of online safety; however, little is known about how users engage with them. We present findings from a nationally representative survey of UK adults examining their experiences with online harms and safety technologies. The results show that online harm is widespread: 67% of respondents report having encountered harmful content online. Among those who are aware of safety tools, over 80% have used at least one, indicating high uptake when knowledge of the tools is present. Awareness of specific tools is varied, with people more aware of ‘post hoc’ safety tools, taken in response to harm exposure (such as reporting or blocking), than preventive measures (such as altering feed algorithms). However, satisfaction with safety technologies is generally low. People who have previously seen online harms are more likely to use safety tools, implying a ‘learning the hard way’ route to engagement. Those higher in digital literacy are also more likely to use some of these tools, raising concerns about the accessibility of these technologies. In addition, women are more likely to engage in particular types of online ‘safety work’. These findings have significant implications for platform designers, regulators, researchers and policymakers seeking to create a safer and more equitable online environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Media + Society\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Media + Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051261431383\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Media + Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051261431383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面向用户的“平台安全技术”包括社交媒体平台提供的一系列工具,以帮助人们保护自己免受伤害,例如允许人们报告内容或阻止其他用户。这些工具是网络安全日益重要的组成部分;然而,我们对用户如何与它们互动知之甚少。我们展示了一项全国代表性的调查结果,调查了英国成年人对网络危害和安全技术的体验。结果显示,网络伤害是普遍存在的:67%的受访者表示在网上遇到过有害内容。在了解安全工具的人中,超过80%的人至少使用过一种工具,这表明在了解这些工具时使用率很高。对特定工具的认识各不相同,人们更了解针对危害暴露(如报告或阻止)而采取的“事后”安全工具,而不是预防措施(如改变馈送算法)。然而,对安全技术的满意度普遍较低。以前看到过网络危害的人更有可能使用安全工具,这意味着一种“艰难的学习”方式。数字素养较高的人也更有可能使用其中一些工具,这引发了人们对这些技术可及性的担忧。此外,女性更有可能从事特定类型的在线“安全工作”。这些发现对平台设计师、监管机构、研究人员和政策制定者寻求创造一个更安全、更公平的在线环境具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Engagement With Platform Safety Technology for Reducing Exposure to Online Harms
User-facing ‘platform safety technology’ encompasses an array of tools offered by social media platforms to help people protect themselves from harm, for example allowing people to report content or block other users. These tools are an increasingly important part of online safety; however, little is known about how users engage with them. We present findings from a nationally representative survey of UK adults examining their experiences with online harms and safety technologies. The results show that online harm is widespread: 67% of respondents report having encountered harmful content online. Among those who are aware of safety tools, over 80% have used at least one, indicating high uptake when knowledge of the tools is present. Awareness of specific tools is varied, with people more aware of ‘post hoc’ safety tools, taken in response to harm exposure (such as reporting or blocking), than preventive measures (such as altering feed algorithms). However, satisfaction with safety technologies is generally low. People who have previously seen online harms are more likely to use safety tools, implying a ‘learning the hard way’ route to engagement. Those higher in digital literacy are also more likely to use some of these tools, raising concerns about the accessibility of these technologies. In addition, women are more likely to engage in particular types of online ‘safety work’. These findings have significant implications for platform designers, regulators, researchers and policymakers seeking to create a safer and more equitable online environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Media + Society
Social Media + Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Media + Society is an open access, peer-reviewed scholarly journal that focuses on the socio-cultural, political, psychological, historical, economic, legal and policy dimensions of social media in societies past, contemporary and future. We publish interdisciplinary work that draws from the social sciences, humanities and computational social sciences, reaches out to the arts and natural sciences, and we endorse mixed methods and methodologies. The journal is open to a diversity of theoretic paradigms and methodologies. The editorial vision of Social Media + Society draws inspiration from research on social media to outline a field of study poised to reflexively grow as social technologies evolve. We foster the open access of sharing of research on the social properties of media, as they manifest themselves through the uses people make of networked platforms past and present, digital and non. The journal presents a collaborative, open, and shared space, dedicated exclusively to the study of social media and their implications for societies. It facilitates state-of-the-art research on cutting-edge trends and allows scholars to focus and track trends specific to this field of study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书