{"title":"量化生态溢出对缓解供需空间错配的贡献:一个综合生态系统服务流框架","authors":"Xiaowen Zhou , Xuesong Zhang , Hongjie Peng , Qiuyu Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has intensified the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand, posing critical challenges for sustainable regional development. Existing assessments, largely based on static supply–demand patterns, often fail to capture the redistributive role of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) in regulating spatial ecological imbalances. To address this limitation, we propose an integrated ecosystem service flow framework that explicitly simulates ESF pathways, magnitudes, and spillover contributions, thereby linking static mismatch assessment with dynamic flow processes. Using multi-source geospatial datasets and process-based models, we quantified the spillover effects of water yield (WY), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS) across the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (UA-MRYR). Results show that ESFs substantially alleviated ecological deficits, with compensation rates of 79.68% (FP), 74.79% (WY), and 61.94% (CS). The three ESFs demonstrated distinct flow mechanisms—unidirectional hydrological routing for WY, market-regulated multi-source networks for FP, and diffusion-driven processes for CS. Integrating flow intensity, total volume, and conflict patterns, we developed a multi-dimensional zoning scheme that delineates Key Functional Zones, Scale Advantage Zones, Potential Cultivation Zones, and Efficiency Focal Zones. By translating ESF spillovers into actionable spatial governance tools, this study offers a scalable pathway for correcting ecological imbalances and guiding adaptive ecological planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"558 ","pages":"Article 148285"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying ecological spillover contributions to mitigate supply–demand spatial mismatch: An integrated ecosystem service flow framework\",\"authors\":\"Xiaowen Zhou , Xuesong Zhang , Hongjie Peng , Qiuyu Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has intensified the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand, posing critical challenges for sustainable regional development. Existing assessments, largely based on static supply–demand patterns, often fail to capture the redistributive role of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) in regulating spatial ecological imbalances. To address this limitation, we propose an integrated ecosystem service flow framework that explicitly simulates ESF pathways, magnitudes, and spillover contributions, thereby linking static mismatch assessment with dynamic flow processes. Using multi-source geospatial datasets and process-based models, we quantified the spillover effects of water yield (WY), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS) across the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (UA-MRYR). Results show that ESFs substantially alleviated ecological deficits, with compensation rates of 79.68% (FP), 74.79% (WY), and 61.94% (CS). The three ESFs demonstrated distinct flow mechanisms—unidirectional hydrological routing for WY, market-regulated multi-source networks for FP, and diffusion-driven processes for CS. Integrating flow intensity, total volume, and conflict patterns, we developed a multi-dimensional zoning scheme that delineates Key Functional Zones, Scale Advantage Zones, Potential Cultivation Zones, and Efficiency Focal Zones. By translating ESF spillovers into actionable spatial governance tools, this study offers a scalable pathway for correcting ecological imbalances and guiding adaptive ecological planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"558 \",\"pages\":\"Article 148285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652626008243\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652626008243","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying ecological spillover contributions to mitigate supply–demand spatial mismatch: An integrated ecosystem service flow framework
Rapid urbanization has intensified the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand, posing critical challenges for sustainable regional development. Existing assessments, largely based on static supply–demand patterns, often fail to capture the redistributive role of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) in regulating spatial ecological imbalances. To address this limitation, we propose an integrated ecosystem service flow framework that explicitly simulates ESF pathways, magnitudes, and spillover contributions, thereby linking static mismatch assessment with dynamic flow processes. Using multi-source geospatial datasets and process-based models, we quantified the spillover effects of water yield (WY), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS) across the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (UA-MRYR). Results show that ESFs substantially alleviated ecological deficits, with compensation rates of 79.68% (FP), 74.79% (WY), and 61.94% (CS). The three ESFs demonstrated distinct flow mechanisms—unidirectional hydrological routing for WY, market-regulated multi-source networks for FP, and diffusion-driven processes for CS. Integrating flow intensity, total volume, and conflict patterns, we developed a multi-dimensional zoning scheme that delineates Key Functional Zones, Scale Advantage Zones, Potential Cultivation Zones, and Efficiency Focal Zones. By translating ESF spillovers into actionable spatial governance tools, this study offers a scalable pathway for correcting ecological imbalances and guiding adaptive ecological planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.