学习的可用性:自我调节学习的必要条件

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Adar Ben-Eliyahu, Matthew L. Bernacki
{"title":"学习的可用性:自我调节学习的必要条件","authors":"Adar Ben-Eliyahu, Matthew L. Bernacki","doi":"10.1007/s10648-026-10144-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical models of self-regulated learning (SRL) describe typical learners and learning processes that occur under ideal conditions. Such models largely ignore the broader environmental and historical challenges that can make some learners less available to engage in academic tasks when they encounter them in daily life. We consider the person- and task-specific variables included in models of SRL and broaden consideration to include the larger ecological system in which the learner and task reside. This integrated framework maps the positive and negative contributions these different factors can make to one’s “availability to learn.” We propose that (1) components in the ecological system combine in a summative ratio of contributors and challenges and (2) they must be regulated to establish availability by surpassing an activation ratio threshold and, thereafter, maintaining the availability to learn is necessary to engage in SRL. When such availability to learn does not arise naturally, we propose additional pathways that illustrate how learners activate SRL, use feedback loops to enhance availability, and draw on past experiences that promote learners’ initiative in future learning tasks. We close by proposing a research paradigm that handles complexity captured in real life circumstances. Assets and threats to one’s availability to learn can be modeled across an ecological system that blends observation of typical self-reported inter-individual differences with the process-oriented intraindividual study of SRL afforded by online measures including think aloud protocols, learning analytics, field observation, and self-reports.","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Availability to Learn: An Essential, Achievable Condition for Self-Regulated Learning\",\"authors\":\"Adar Ben-Eliyahu, Matthew L. Bernacki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10648-026-10144-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretical models of self-regulated learning (SRL) describe typical learners and learning processes that occur under ideal conditions. Such models largely ignore the broader environmental and historical challenges that can make some learners less available to engage in academic tasks when they encounter them in daily life. We consider the person- and task-specific variables included in models of SRL and broaden consideration to include the larger ecological system in which the learner and task reside. This integrated framework maps the positive and negative contributions these different factors can make to one’s “availability to learn.” We propose that (1) components in the ecological system combine in a summative ratio of contributors and challenges and (2) they must be regulated to establish availability by surpassing an activation ratio threshold and, thereafter, maintaining the availability to learn is necessary to engage in SRL. When such availability to learn does not arise naturally, we propose additional pathways that illustrate how learners activate SRL, use feedback loops to enhance availability, and draw on past experiences that promote learners’ initiative in future learning tasks. We close by proposing a research paradigm that handles complexity captured in real life circumstances. Assets and threats to one’s availability to learn can be modeled across an ecological system that blends observation of typical self-reported inter-individual differences with the process-oriented intraindividual study of SRL afforded by online measures including think aloud protocols, learning analytics, field observation, and self-reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10144-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10144-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我调节学习的理论模型描述了在理想条件下发生的典型学习者和学习过程。这种模式在很大程度上忽略了更广泛的环境和历史挑战,这些挑战可能会使一些学习者在日常生活中遇到学术任务时无法投入其中。我们考虑了SRL模型中包含的个人和任务特定变量,并将考虑范围扩大到包括学习者和任务所在的更大的生态系统。这个综合框架描绘了这些不同因素对一个人的“学习可用性”的积极和消极贡献。我们建议:(1)生态系统中的组成部分以贡献者和挑战的总比例组合在一起;(2)必须通过超过激活比率阈值来调节它们以建立可用性,然后保持学习的可用性是参与SRL所必需的。当这种学习的可用性不是自然产生时,我们提出了额外的途径来说明学习者如何激活SRL,使用反馈循环来增强可用性,并借鉴过去的经验来促进学习者在未来学习任务中的主动性。最后,我们提出了一个研究范式来处理现实生活环境中捕获的复杂性。一个人学习能力的优势和威胁可以在一个生态系统中建模,该生态系统将典型的自我报告的个体间差异的观察与基于过程的SRL的个体内部研究相结合,这些研究由在线措施提供,包括大声思考协议、学习分析、实地观察和自我报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Availability to Learn: An Essential, Achievable Condition for Self-Regulated Learning
Theoretical models of self-regulated learning (SRL) describe typical learners and learning processes that occur under ideal conditions. Such models largely ignore the broader environmental and historical challenges that can make some learners less available to engage in academic tasks when they encounter them in daily life. We consider the person- and task-specific variables included in models of SRL and broaden consideration to include the larger ecological system in which the learner and task reside. This integrated framework maps the positive and negative contributions these different factors can make to one’s “availability to learn.” We propose that (1) components in the ecological system combine in a summative ratio of contributors and challenges and (2) they must be regulated to establish availability by surpassing an activation ratio threshold and, thereafter, maintaining the availability to learn is necessary to engage in SRL. When such availability to learn does not arise naturally, we propose additional pathways that illustrate how learners activate SRL, use feedback loops to enhance availability, and draw on past experiences that promote learners’ initiative in future learning tasks. We close by proposing a research paradigm that handles complexity captured in real life circumstances. Assets and threats to one’s availability to learn can be modeled across an ecological system that blends observation of typical self-reported inter-individual differences with the process-oriented intraindividual study of SRL afforded by online measures including think aloud protocols, learning analytics, field observation, and self-reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书