痛苦体验问卷:量表开发与验证。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Bassam Khoury, Rodrigo C Vergara
{"title":"痛苦体验问卷:量表开发与验证。","authors":"Bassam Khoury, Rodrigo C Vergara","doi":"10.1177/10731911261437561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suffering is a universal, subjective experience distinct from symptoms or diagnoses. Most existing measures reduce it to single items or symptom checklists, and even recent advances fail to capture its full breadth or the dimension of overcoming suffering. The Suffering Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) provides a comprehensive, theory-agnostic instrument assessing both suffering and overcoming across contexts. The SEQ was developed in four steps. First, the initial pool of over 100 items was generated from clinical experience. Second, graduate-students reduced it to 91 items. Third, an expert panel of 14 scholars and clinicians refined it to 64 items divided between suffering and overcoming. Finally, three graduate students reviewed items for readability. Two validation studies assessed psychometric properties and utility. Study 1 reduced the SEQ to 20 items and established its structure and internal consistency, along with a 10-item short form (SEQ-10). Study 2 confirmed structure, reliability, and convergent and concurrent validity. Both versions converged with and predicted symptomatology and well-being outcomes and were meaningful from Western and Eastern perspectives. The SEQ and SEQ-10 are the first non-symptom-based measures integrating suffering and overcoming. Both demonstrate strong psychometric properties and clinical utility. Strengths, limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911261437561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suffering Experiences Questionnaires: Scales Development and Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Bassam Khoury, Rodrigo C Vergara\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911261437561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Suffering is a universal, subjective experience distinct from symptoms or diagnoses. Most existing measures reduce it to single items or symptom checklists, and even recent advances fail to capture its full breadth or the dimension of overcoming suffering. The Suffering Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) provides a comprehensive, theory-agnostic instrument assessing both suffering and overcoming across contexts. The SEQ was developed in four steps. First, the initial pool of over 100 items was generated from clinical experience. Second, graduate-students reduced it to 91 items. Third, an expert panel of 14 scholars and clinicians refined it to 64 items divided between suffering and overcoming. Finally, three graduate students reviewed items for readability. Two validation studies assessed psychometric properties and utility. Study 1 reduced the SEQ to 20 items and established its structure and internal consistency, along with a 10-item short form (SEQ-10). Study 2 confirmed structure, reliability, and convergent and concurrent validity. Both versions converged with and predicted symptomatology and well-being outcomes and were meaningful from Western and Eastern perspectives. The SEQ and SEQ-10 are the first non-symptom-based measures integrating suffering and overcoming. Both demonstrate strong psychometric properties and clinical utility. Strengths, limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911261437561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261437561\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261437561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

痛苦是一种普遍的主观体验,不同于症状或诊断。大多数现有措施将其减少到单个项目或症状清单,甚至最近的进展也未能充分把握其广度或克服痛苦的维度。痛苦经历问卷(SEQ)提供了一个全面的,理论不可知论的工具评估痛苦和克服跨背景。SEQ的开发分为四个步骤。首先,最初的100多个项目是根据临床经验产生的。其次,研究生将其减少到91项。第三,一个由14名学者和临床医生组成的专家小组将其细化为64个项目,分为痛苦和克服。最后,三名研究生审阅了可读性项目。两项验证研究评估了心理测量的性质和效用。研究1将SEQ缩减为20个条目,建立了SEQ的结构和内部一致性,并编制了一个包含10个条目的短表(SEQ-10)。研究2证实了结构、信度、收敛效度和并发效度。这两个版本都融合并预测了症状学和健康结果,从西方和东方的角度来看都是有意义的。SEQ和SEQ-10是第一个不以症状为基础的综合痛苦和克服措施。两者都显示出强大的心理测量特性和临床应用。讨论了其优势、局限性、影响和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suffering Experiences Questionnaires: Scales Development and Validation.

Suffering is a universal, subjective experience distinct from symptoms or diagnoses. Most existing measures reduce it to single items or symptom checklists, and even recent advances fail to capture its full breadth or the dimension of overcoming suffering. The Suffering Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) provides a comprehensive, theory-agnostic instrument assessing both suffering and overcoming across contexts. The SEQ was developed in four steps. First, the initial pool of over 100 items was generated from clinical experience. Second, graduate-students reduced it to 91 items. Third, an expert panel of 14 scholars and clinicians refined it to 64 items divided between suffering and overcoming. Finally, three graduate students reviewed items for readability. Two validation studies assessed psychometric properties and utility. Study 1 reduced the SEQ to 20 items and established its structure and internal consistency, along with a 10-item short form (SEQ-10). Study 2 confirmed structure, reliability, and convergent and concurrent validity. Both versions converged with and predicted symptomatology and well-being outcomes and were meaningful from Western and Eastern perspectives. The SEQ and SEQ-10 are the first non-symptom-based measures integrating suffering and overcoming. Both demonstrate strong psychometric properties and clinical utility. Strengths, limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书