高保真度与中等保真度模拟在护理教育中的有效性:随机对照试验。

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING
Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2026-04-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2025-0134
Franciane Silva Luiz, Isabel Cristina Gonçalves Leite, Luana Vieira Toledo, Kelli Borges Dos Santos, André Luiz Silva Alvim, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Angélica da Conceição Oliveira Coelho, Fábio da Costa Carbogim
{"title":"高保真度与中等保真度模拟在护理教育中的有效性:随机对照试验。","authors":"Franciane Silva Luiz, Isabel Cristina Gonçalves Leite, Luana Vieira Toledo, Kelli Borges Dos Santos, André Luiz Silva Alvim, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Angélica da Conceição Oliveira Coelho, Fábio da Costa Carbogim","doi":"10.1590/0034-7167-2025-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to compare the effectiveness of highand medium-fidelity clinical simulation on nursing students' knowledge and clinical skills for pressure injury assessment and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Thirty-two nursing students were assigned to an experimental group (n=17) or a control group (n=15). The intervention comprised a theoretical component and a simulation-high fidelity for the experimental group and medium fidelity for the control group. Data were collected with a sociodemographic questionnaire, a theoretical test, a skills checklist, and a Debriefing Assessment Scale. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA, and effect size, at a 5% significance level (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>both groups showed significant improvement in theoretical knowledge (p<0.05). The groups did not differ significantly in skills (p=0.853). The debriefing experience was positive and similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>simulation improved knowledge and skills, with no differences by simulation fidelity level.</p>","PeriodicalId":21200,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","volume":"79 ","pages":"e20250134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13053011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of highand medium-fidelity simulation in nursing education: randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Franciane Silva Luiz, Isabel Cristina Gonçalves Leite, Luana Vieira Toledo, Kelli Borges Dos Santos, André Luiz Silva Alvim, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Angélica da Conceição Oliveira Coelho, Fábio da Costa Carbogim\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7167-2025-0134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to compare the effectiveness of highand medium-fidelity clinical simulation on nursing students' knowledge and clinical skills for pressure injury assessment and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Thirty-two nursing students were assigned to an experimental group (n=17) or a control group (n=15). The intervention comprised a theoretical component and a simulation-high fidelity for the experimental group and medium fidelity for the control group. Data were collected with a sociodemographic questionnaire, a theoretical test, a skills checklist, and a Debriefing Assessment Scale. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA, and effect size, at a 5% significance level (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>both groups showed significant improvement in theoretical knowledge (p<0.05). The groups did not differ significantly in skills (p=0.853). The debriefing experience was positive and similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>simulation improved knowledge and skills, with no differences by simulation fidelity level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"e20250134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13053011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2025-0134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2025-0134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较高保真度与中等保真度临床模拟对护生压力损伤评估与治疗知识和临床技能的影响。方法:评价盲随机对照试验。将32名护生分为实验组(n=17)和对照组(n=15)。干预包括理论部分和模拟部分——实验组为高保真度,对照组为中等保真度。通过社会人口调查问卷、理论测试、技能检查表和汇报评估量表收集数据。统计学分析采用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、方差分析和效应量,显著性水平为5% (α=0.05)。结果:两组在理论知识方面均有显著提高(p)。结论:模拟提高了知识和技能,但模拟逼真程度无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of highand medium-fidelity simulation in nursing education: randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: to compare the effectiveness of highand medium-fidelity clinical simulation on nursing students' knowledge and clinical skills for pressure injury assessment and treatment.

Methods: assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Thirty-two nursing students were assigned to an experimental group (n=17) or a control group (n=15). The intervention comprised a theoretical component and a simulation-high fidelity for the experimental group and medium fidelity for the control group. Data were collected with a sociodemographic questionnaire, a theoretical test, a skills checklist, and a Debriefing Assessment Scale. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA, and effect size, at a 5% significance level (α=0.05).

Results: both groups showed significant improvement in theoretical knowledge (p<0.05). The groups did not differ significantly in skills (p=0.853). The debriefing experience was positive and similar in both groups.

Conclusions: simulation improved knowledge and skills, with no differences by simulation fidelity level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
477
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem created in 1932, March 20 is the official publication of the Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (Brazilian Nursing Association) has as purpose to disseminate the scientific production from different nursing interest areas of knowledge, including those which express the political project of the Association. The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem is the oldest journal of the Brazilian nursing. Its first title was "Annaes de Enfermagem" from 1932 to 1941, being entitled Anais de Enfermagem" until 1955, when its title was changed to the current.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书