氧化应激与衰老的复杂关系:异同的新视角。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Xue-Song Liu, Chenglong Zhu, Haoling Zhang, Wangzheqi Zhang
{"title":"氧化应激与衰老的复杂关系:异同的新视角。","authors":"Xue-Song Liu, Chenglong Zhu, Haoling Zhang, Wangzheqi Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2026.2651307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association of oxidative stress with aging is considered one of the key theoretical cornerstones in aging research, but accumulating evidence has cast some doubt on the validity of a single \"cumulative oxidative damage\" hypothesis as its mechanism. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the complex interplay between oxidative stress and aging, with a particular focus on their shared mechanisms and context-dependent effects. ROS should not be regarded only as deleterious metabolic waste, but indeed act as pivotal signaling mediators in metabolic, stress, and cell fate regulation within the frame of physiological ranges. In addition, emerging evidence highlights the dual roles of ROS in maintaining cellular homeostasis and mediating stress responses depending on their concentration and spatial distribution. Only when the fine-tuned equilibrium that usually couples ROS production and disposal is perturbed and quality-control activity becomes defective does this signaling network gradually shift from a physiological into a pathological source of stress promoting cellular senescence and tissue malfunction. Aging should thus be considered the outcome of structural derangement in homeostatic regulatory networks caused by chronic stress. This view of the aging process is developed through a discussion of key events comprising oxidative DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, decline in autophagy and lysosomal degradation, as well as senescent cell secretion (SASP), indicating that their reciprocal interactions together define phenotypic features characterizing the aging cell. This network-centric model further mechanistically justifies why peripheral effects of broad-spectrum antioxidant interventions are heterogeneous, and points to rolling back the damage with compensatory quality-control mechanisms and homeostatic regulation as a more effective path toward understanding how to restore homeostasis. These insights may contribute to the development of more precise therapeutic strategies targeting aging-related diseases and improving healthspan. Future research should further clarify the spatiotemporal dynamics of ROS signaling and its integration with cellular stress-response networks. Moreover, elucidating the threshold-dependent and context-specific effects of oxidative signaling may provide a conceptual basis for precision interventions in aging and age-related diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The complex relationship between oxidative stress and aging: new perspectives on similarities and differences.\",\"authors\":\"Xue-Song Liu, Chenglong Zhu, Haoling Zhang, Wangzheqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408363.2026.2651307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The association of oxidative stress with aging is considered one of the key theoretical cornerstones in aging research, but accumulating evidence has cast some doubt on the validity of a single \\\"cumulative oxidative damage\\\" hypothesis as its mechanism. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the complex interplay between oxidative stress and aging, with a particular focus on their shared mechanisms and context-dependent effects. ROS should not be regarded only as deleterious metabolic waste, but indeed act as pivotal signaling mediators in metabolic, stress, and cell fate regulation within the frame of physiological ranges. In addition, emerging evidence highlights the dual roles of ROS in maintaining cellular homeostasis and mediating stress responses depending on their concentration and spatial distribution. Only when the fine-tuned equilibrium that usually couples ROS production and disposal is perturbed and quality-control activity becomes defective does this signaling network gradually shift from a physiological into a pathological source of stress promoting cellular senescence and tissue malfunction. Aging should thus be considered the outcome of structural derangement in homeostatic regulatory networks caused by chronic stress. This view of the aging process is developed through a discussion of key events comprising oxidative DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, decline in autophagy and lysosomal degradation, as well as senescent cell secretion (SASP), indicating that their reciprocal interactions together define phenotypic features characterizing the aging cell. This network-centric model further mechanistically justifies why peripheral effects of broad-spectrum antioxidant interventions are heterogeneous, and points to rolling back the damage with compensatory quality-control mechanisms and homeostatic regulation as a more effective path toward understanding how to restore homeostasis. These insights may contribute to the development of more precise therapeutic strategies targeting aging-related diseases and improving healthspan. Future research should further clarify the spatiotemporal dynamics of ROS signaling and its integration with cellular stress-response networks. Moreover, elucidating the threshold-dependent and context-specific effects of oxidative signaling may provide a conceptual basis for precision interventions in aging and age-related diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2026.2651307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2026.2651307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氧化应激与衰老的关系被认为是衰老研究的关键理论基础之一,但越来越多的证据使人们对单一的“累积氧化损伤”假说的有效性产生了怀疑。本文旨在对氧化应激与衰老之间复杂的相互作用进行全面和最新的综述,特别关注它们的共同机制和环境依赖效应。ROS不应仅仅被视为有害的代谢废物,而是在生理范围内作为代谢、应激和细胞命运调节的关键信号介质。此外,新出现的证据强调了ROS在维持细胞稳态和介导应激反应方面的双重作用,这取决于它们的浓度和空间分布。只有当通常耦合ROS产生和处理的精细平衡被扰乱,质量控制活动出现缺陷时,这个信号网络才会逐渐从生理应激源转变为病理应激源,从而促进细胞衰老和组织功能障碍。因此,衰老应该被认为是由慢性应激引起的体内平衡调节网络结构紊乱的结果。衰老过程的这一观点是通过对DNA氧化损伤、线粒体功能障碍、自噬和溶酶体降解下降以及衰老细胞分泌(SASP)等关键事件的讨论而发展起来的,表明它们的相互作用共同定义了衰老细胞的表型特征。这个以网络为中心的模型进一步从机制上证明了为什么广谱抗氧化干预的外周效应是异质的,并指出通过代偿性质量控制机制和体内平衡调节来减少损害是理解如何恢复体内平衡的更有效途径。这些见解可能有助于开发针对衰老相关疾病的更精确的治疗策略,并改善健康状况。未来的研究应进一步阐明ROS信号的时空动态及其与细胞应激反应网络的整合。此外,阐明氧化信号的阈值依赖性和上下文特异性效应可能为衰老和年龄相关疾病的精确干预提供概念基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The complex relationship between oxidative stress and aging: new perspectives on similarities and differences.

The association of oxidative stress with aging is considered one of the key theoretical cornerstones in aging research, but accumulating evidence has cast some doubt on the validity of a single "cumulative oxidative damage" hypothesis as its mechanism. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the complex interplay between oxidative stress and aging, with a particular focus on their shared mechanisms and context-dependent effects. ROS should not be regarded only as deleterious metabolic waste, but indeed act as pivotal signaling mediators in metabolic, stress, and cell fate regulation within the frame of physiological ranges. In addition, emerging evidence highlights the dual roles of ROS in maintaining cellular homeostasis and mediating stress responses depending on their concentration and spatial distribution. Only when the fine-tuned equilibrium that usually couples ROS production and disposal is perturbed and quality-control activity becomes defective does this signaling network gradually shift from a physiological into a pathological source of stress promoting cellular senescence and tissue malfunction. Aging should thus be considered the outcome of structural derangement in homeostatic regulatory networks caused by chronic stress. This view of the aging process is developed through a discussion of key events comprising oxidative DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, decline in autophagy and lysosomal degradation, as well as senescent cell secretion (SASP), indicating that their reciprocal interactions together define phenotypic features characterizing the aging cell. This network-centric model further mechanistically justifies why peripheral effects of broad-spectrum antioxidant interventions are heterogeneous, and points to rolling back the damage with compensatory quality-control mechanisms and homeostatic regulation as a more effective path toward understanding how to restore homeostasis. These insights may contribute to the development of more precise therapeutic strategies targeting aging-related diseases and improving healthspan. Future research should further clarify the spatiotemporal dynamics of ROS signaling and its integration with cellular stress-response networks. Moreover, elucidating the threshold-dependent and context-specific effects of oxidative signaling may provide a conceptual basis for precision interventions in aging and age-related diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书