Mackenzie Weise, Leslie Marie Manso, Shikha Chandarana, Mark Edberg
{"title":"青少年暴力预防计划中的歧视、种族主义和结构性决定因素:范围审查和干预成分分析。","authors":"Mackenzie Weise, Leslie Marie Manso, Shikha Chandarana, Mark Edberg","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01906-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review maps youth violence prevention studies (1990-2025) that explicitly incorporate discrimination, racism, or structural terms in titles/abstracts, categorizes violence outcomes, and analyzes interventions with components specifically designed to address these factors. From 1034 unique records across a multi-disciplinary group of eight databases, a very small fraction of eligible studies that explicitly centered and named discrimination-related concepts was identified (n = 14). Among these, the use of \"discrimination\" and \"structural\" terminology was most salient. Violence outcomes were inconsistently operationalized but most included subjective measures of youth problem behavior or aggression; objective outcome measures related to formalized offenses were moderately used. Five studies featured programs targeting discrimination, racism, or structural determinants and qualified for intervention component analysis (ICA). Most of the studies leveraged multicomponent interventions, but reporting on change mechanisms varied widely. This review highlights a gap between rhetoric around the role of discrimination and structural factors in youth violence and how interventions are designed, indexed, and evaluated. Our ICA findings suggest practical models for embedding discrimination or structural components in prevention programs. Rather than identifying all programs impacting these factors, this review maps those explicitly focused on them. Findings urge funders, journals, and leaders to prioritize evaluations which clearly articulate how prevention interventions address upstream drivers of youth violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination, Racism, and Structural Determinants in Youth Violence Prevention Programs: A Scoping Review and Intervention Component Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie Weise, Leslie Marie Manso, Shikha Chandarana, Mark Edberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11121-026-01906-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This scoping review maps youth violence prevention studies (1990-2025) that explicitly incorporate discrimination, racism, or structural terms in titles/abstracts, categorizes violence outcomes, and analyzes interventions with components specifically designed to address these factors. From 1034 unique records across a multi-disciplinary group of eight databases, a very small fraction of eligible studies that explicitly centered and named discrimination-related concepts was identified (n = 14). Among these, the use of \\\"discrimination\\\" and \\\"structural\\\" terminology was most salient. Violence outcomes were inconsistently operationalized but most included subjective measures of youth problem behavior or aggression; objective outcome measures related to formalized offenses were moderately used. Five studies featured programs targeting discrimination, racism, or structural determinants and qualified for intervention component analysis (ICA). Most of the studies leveraged multicomponent interventions, but reporting on change mechanisms varied widely. This review highlights a gap between rhetoric around the role of discrimination and structural factors in youth violence and how interventions are designed, indexed, and evaluated. Our ICA findings suggest practical models for embedding discrimination or structural components in prevention programs. Rather than identifying all programs impacting these factors, this review maps those explicitly focused on them. Findings urge funders, journals, and leaders to prioritize evaluations which clearly articulate how prevention interventions address upstream drivers of youth violence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01906-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01906-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrimination, Racism, and Structural Determinants in Youth Violence Prevention Programs: A Scoping Review and Intervention Component Analysis.
This scoping review maps youth violence prevention studies (1990-2025) that explicitly incorporate discrimination, racism, or structural terms in titles/abstracts, categorizes violence outcomes, and analyzes interventions with components specifically designed to address these factors. From 1034 unique records across a multi-disciplinary group of eight databases, a very small fraction of eligible studies that explicitly centered and named discrimination-related concepts was identified (n = 14). Among these, the use of "discrimination" and "structural" terminology was most salient. Violence outcomes were inconsistently operationalized but most included subjective measures of youth problem behavior or aggression; objective outcome measures related to formalized offenses were moderately used. Five studies featured programs targeting discrimination, racism, or structural determinants and qualified for intervention component analysis (ICA). Most of the studies leveraged multicomponent interventions, but reporting on change mechanisms varied widely. This review highlights a gap between rhetoric around the role of discrimination and structural factors in youth violence and how interventions are designed, indexed, and evaluated. Our ICA findings suggest practical models for embedding discrimination or structural components in prevention programs. Rather than identifying all programs impacting these factors, this review maps those explicitly focused on them. Findings urge funders, journals, and leaders to prioritize evaluations which clearly articulate how prevention interventions address upstream drivers of youth violence.
期刊介绍:
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.