一种新型锚固交换装置的初始多中心评价:基于人工智能的远端尖端运动定量分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Kenichi Kono, Nobuyuki Sakai, Yuya Sakakura, Takeshi Fujimoto, Yoshinori Akiyama, Fuminori Shimizu
{"title":"一种新型锚固交换装置的初始多中心评价:基于人工智能的远端尖端运动定量分析。","authors":"Kenichi Kono, Nobuyuki Sakai, Yuya Sakakura, Takeshi Fujimoto, Yoshinori Akiyama, Fuminori Shimizu","doi":"10.1007/s00062-026-01650-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exchange maneuvers during intracranial angioplasty and stent deployment can cause unintended distal tip motion, potentially leading to vessel injury. We evaluated a novel anchoring exchange device (Medilizer; Medikit, Tokyo, Japan), a 320-cm 0.014-inch wire with a retrievable self-expanding stent at the distal tip, designed to stabilize the distal position during exchange maneuvers and approved for clinical use in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared exchange maneuvers using conventional wires with those using a Medilizer during angioplasty of intracranial stenosis performed at three institutions. Biplane fluoroscopic sequences (frontal and lateral views) were analyzed using an AI-assisted tracking system to quantify the trajectory length of distal tip motion in each view.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen consecutive procedures (10 conventional wire cases and 7 Medilizer cases) were included. In one Medilizer case, the distal tip was outside the field of view in one projection, which was excluded from the analysis. Consequently, 20 conventional wire and 13 Medilizer views were analyzed. The trajectory length of the distal tip was significantly shorter with the Medilizer than with conventional wires (3.3 ± 1.5 mm vs. 35.9 ± 20.0 mm; p < 0.001), corresponding to an approximately 90% reduction. No adverse events occurred in any of the 17 procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even in this initial cohort, the magnitude of improvement in distal tip motion strongly suggests clinically meaningful stability advantages of this anchoring exchange device. Furthermore, AI-assisted quantitative evaluation can provide an objective measure of endovascular device performance, warranting further validation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Anchoring Exchange Device: AI-based Quantitative Distal Tip-Motion Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kenichi Kono, Nobuyuki Sakai, Yuya Sakakura, Takeshi Fujimoto, Yoshinori Akiyama, Fuminori Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-026-01650-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exchange maneuvers during intracranial angioplasty and stent deployment can cause unintended distal tip motion, potentially leading to vessel injury. We evaluated a novel anchoring exchange device (Medilizer; Medikit, Tokyo, Japan), a 320-cm 0.014-inch wire with a retrievable self-expanding stent at the distal tip, designed to stabilize the distal position during exchange maneuvers and approved for clinical use in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared exchange maneuvers using conventional wires with those using a Medilizer during angioplasty of intracranial stenosis performed at three institutions. Biplane fluoroscopic sequences (frontal and lateral views) were analyzed using an AI-assisted tracking system to quantify the trajectory length of distal tip motion in each view.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen consecutive procedures (10 conventional wire cases and 7 Medilizer cases) were included. In one Medilizer case, the distal tip was outside the field of view in one projection, which was excluded from the analysis. Consequently, 20 conventional wire and 13 Medilizer views were analyzed. The trajectory length of the distal tip was significantly shorter with the Medilizer than with conventional wires (3.3 ± 1.5 mm vs. 35.9 ± 20.0 mm; p < 0.001), corresponding to an approximately 90% reduction. No adverse events occurred in any of the 17 procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even in this initial cohort, the magnitude of improvement in distal tip motion strongly suggests clinically meaningful stability advantages of this anchoring exchange device. Furthermore, AI-assisted quantitative evaluation can provide an objective measure of endovascular device performance, warranting further validation studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01650-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01650-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颅内血管成形术和支架部署期间的交换操作可导致意外的远端尖端运动,潜在地导致血管损伤。我们评估了一种新型的锚定交换装置(Medilizer; Medikit, Tokyo, Japan),这是一种320厘米0.014英寸的金属丝,在远端末端有一个可回收的自膨胀支架,用于在交换操作中稳定远端位置,并在日本被批准用于临床使用。方法:我们比较了在三家机构进行的颅内狭窄血管成形术中使用传统金属丝和使用Medilizer的交换操作。使用人工智能辅助跟踪系统分析双翼透视序列(正面和侧面视图),以量化每个视图中远端尖端运动的轨迹长度。结果:包括17例连续手术,其中10例为常规钢丝手术,7例为Medilizer手术。在一个Medilizer病例中,远端尖端在一个投影的视野之外,这被排除在分析之外。结果,对20例常规钢丝图和13例Medilizer图进行了分析。使用Medilizer的远端尖端的轨迹长度明显短于传统金属丝(3.3 ±1.5 mm vs. 35.9 ±20.0 mm; p )结论:即使在这个初始队列中,远端尖端运动的改善程度也强烈表明该锚定交换装置具有临床意义的稳定性优势。此外,人工智能辅助的定量评估可以提供血管内装置性能的客观衡量,需要进一步的验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Anchoring Exchange Device: AI-based Quantitative Distal Tip-Motion Analysis.

Purpose: Exchange maneuvers during intracranial angioplasty and stent deployment can cause unintended distal tip motion, potentially leading to vessel injury. We evaluated a novel anchoring exchange device (Medilizer; Medikit, Tokyo, Japan), a 320-cm 0.014-inch wire with a retrievable self-expanding stent at the distal tip, designed to stabilize the distal position during exchange maneuvers and approved for clinical use in Japan.

Methods: We compared exchange maneuvers using conventional wires with those using a Medilizer during angioplasty of intracranial stenosis performed at three institutions. Biplane fluoroscopic sequences (frontal and lateral views) were analyzed using an AI-assisted tracking system to quantify the trajectory length of distal tip motion in each view.

Results: Seventeen consecutive procedures (10 conventional wire cases and 7 Medilizer cases) were included. In one Medilizer case, the distal tip was outside the field of view in one projection, which was excluded from the analysis. Consequently, 20 conventional wire and 13 Medilizer views were analyzed. The trajectory length of the distal tip was significantly shorter with the Medilizer than with conventional wires (3.3 ± 1.5 mm vs. 35.9 ± 20.0 mm; p < 0.001), corresponding to an approximately 90% reduction. No adverse events occurred in any of the 17 procedures.

Conclusion: Even in this initial cohort, the magnitude of improvement in distal tip motion strongly suggests clinically meaningful stability advantages of this anchoring exchange device. Furthermore, AI-assisted quantitative evaluation can provide an objective measure of endovascular device performance, warranting further validation studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书