巴西、英国和荷兰的兽医抗菌药物监测系统:对巴西支持系统发展的描述性比较

Science in One Health Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.soh.2026.100154
Jessica Kayamori Lopes , Briana Gomes , Bruno Machuca Thon , Saulo Henrique Weber , Ruan Rolnei Daros , Fernando Bittencourt Luciano , Claudia Turra Pimpao
{"title":"巴西、英国和荷兰的兽医抗菌药物监测系统:对巴西支持系统发展的描述性比较","authors":"Jessica Kayamori Lopes ,&nbsp;Briana Gomes ,&nbsp;Bruno Machuca Thon ,&nbsp;Saulo Henrique Weber ,&nbsp;Ruan Rolnei Daros ,&nbsp;Fernando Bittencourt Luciano ,&nbsp;Claudia Turra Pimpao","doi":"10.1016/j.soh.2026.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of antimicrobial agents in animals contributes to the emergence and spread of bacterial antimicrobial resistance, posing risks to human, animal, and environmental health. Monitoring antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals is a critical component of antimicrobial stewardship. This study describes the current state of antimicrobial use and resistance monitoring in animals in Brazil and compares it to systems implemented in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands, countries known for having well-established surveillance frameworks. Data were collected between July 2019 and November 2025 from official technical reports on veterinary antimicrobial sales and use, as well as policy documents and legislation. Findings show that the UK and the Netherlands have developed integrated systems based on mandatory data reporting and sector-specific metrics. These systems are supported by coordinated policies and high stakeholder engagement. In contrast, Brazil lacks a national system for monitoring antimicrobial use in animals. Sales data are not publicly available, and there is no standardized mechanism to track antimicrobial consumption on farms. Although policy frameworks exist, enforcement is limited, and access to surveillance data is fragmented. The absence of a centralized, transparent system hinders Brazil’s capacity to evaluate antimicrobial use patterns or inform targeted interventions. Given Brazil’s leading role in global animal protein production, addressing these gaps is essential to advancing national stewardship efforts and contributing to global strategies to contain bacterial antimicrobial resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101146,"journal":{"name":"Science in One Health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veterinary antimicrobial monitoring systems in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands: a descriptive comparison to support system development in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Kayamori Lopes ,&nbsp;Briana Gomes ,&nbsp;Bruno Machuca Thon ,&nbsp;Saulo Henrique Weber ,&nbsp;Ruan Rolnei Daros ,&nbsp;Fernando Bittencourt Luciano ,&nbsp;Claudia Turra Pimpao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soh.2026.100154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of antimicrobial agents in animals contributes to the emergence and spread of bacterial antimicrobial resistance, posing risks to human, animal, and environmental health. Monitoring antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals is a critical component of antimicrobial stewardship. This study describes the current state of antimicrobial use and resistance monitoring in animals in Brazil and compares it to systems implemented in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands, countries known for having well-established surveillance frameworks. Data were collected between July 2019 and November 2025 from official technical reports on veterinary antimicrobial sales and use, as well as policy documents and legislation. Findings show that the UK and the Netherlands have developed integrated systems based on mandatory data reporting and sector-specific metrics. These systems are supported by coordinated policies and high stakeholder engagement. In contrast, Brazil lacks a national system for monitoring antimicrobial use in animals. Sales data are not publicly available, and there is no standardized mechanism to track antimicrobial consumption on farms. Although policy frameworks exist, enforcement is limited, and access to surveillance data is fragmented. The absence of a centralized, transparent system hinders Brazil’s capacity to evaluate antimicrobial use patterns or inform targeted interventions. Given Brazil’s leading role in global animal protein production, addressing these gaps is essential to advancing national stewardship efforts and contributing to global strategies to contain bacterial antimicrobial resistance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science in One Health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science in One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704326000090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704326000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在动物中使用抗菌剂有助于细菌抗菌素耐药性的出现和传播,对人类、动物和环境健康构成风险。监测食用动物的抗微生物药物消费是抗微生物药物管理的关键组成部分。本研究描述了巴西动物抗微生物药物使用和耐药性监测的现状,并将其与英国和荷兰实施的系统进行了比较,这两个国家以拥有完善的监测框架而闻名。数据收集于2019年7月至2025年11月期间,收集自有关兽医用抗菌药物销售和使用的官方技术报告以及政策文件和立法。调查结果显示,英国和荷兰已经开发出基于强制性数据报告和特定行业指标的综合系统。这些系统得到协调政策和利益攸关方高度参与的支持。相比之下,巴西缺乏监测动物中抗菌素使用情况的国家系统。销售数据没有公开,也没有标准化机制来跟踪农场的抗菌药物消费。尽管存在政策框架,但执行力度有限,对监测数据的获取也是零散的。缺乏集中、透明的系统阻碍了巴西评估抗微生物药物使用模式或为有针对性的干预措施提供信息的能力。鉴于巴西在全球动物蛋白生产中的主导作用,解决这些差距对于推进国家管理工作和促进遏制细菌抗微生物药物耐药性的全球战略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Veterinary antimicrobial monitoring systems in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands: a descriptive comparison to support system development in Brazil

Veterinary antimicrobial monitoring systems in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands: a descriptive comparison to support system development in Brazil
The use of antimicrobial agents in animals contributes to the emergence and spread of bacterial antimicrobial resistance, posing risks to human, animal, and environmental health. Monitoring antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals is a critical component of antimicrobial stewardship. This study describes the current state of antimicrobial use and resistance monitoring in animals in Brazil and compares it to systems implemented in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands, countries known for having well-established surveillance frameworks. Data were collected between July 2019 and November 2025 from official technical reports on veterinary antimicrobial sales and use, as well as policy documents and legislation. Findings show that the UK and the Netherlands have developed integrated systems based on mandatory data reporting and sector-specific metrics. These systems are supported by coordinated policies and high stakeholder engagement. In contrast, Brazil lacks a national system for monitoring antimicrobial use in animals. Sales data are not publicly available, and there is no standardized mechanism to track antimicrobial consumption on farms. Although policy frameworks exist, enforcement is limited, and access to surveillance data is fragmented. The absence of a centralized, transparent system hinders Brazil’s capacity to evaluate antimicrobial use patterns or inform targeted interventions. Given Brazil’s leading role in global animal protein production, addressing these gaps is essential to advancing national stewardship efforts and contributing to global strategies to contain bacterial antimicrobial resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书