构建加拿大公共卫生的未来:更新核心能力的改进德尔菲调查。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Melissa MacKay, Harman S Sandhu, Alexandra Henteleff, Mandy Walker, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Sarah E Neil-Sztramko, Malcolm Steinberg, Claire Betker
{"title":"构建加拿大公共卫生的未来:更新核心能力的改进德尔菲调查。","authors":"Melissa MacKay, Harman S Sandhu, Alexandra Henteleff, Mandy Walker, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Sarah E Neil-Sztramko, Malcolm Steinberg, Claire Betker","doi":"10.17269/s41997-026-01151-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The process of updating the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 1.0, was initiated in 2023 using a multi-method approach. This included evidence syntheses, an extensive engagement process to ensure relevance to current public health challenges and a Delphi survey. The objective of this study was to assess agreement on the updated competency statements among a diverse range of public health professionals, educators, policymakers, and community representatives across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi survey was conducted in English and French to assess agreement with 68 draft competency statements across 10 categories. Eligible participants were members of the Canadian public health community who were 18 years of age or older and able to participate in either official language. Participants rated their agreement with each statement using a 6-point Likert scale, with an a priori agreement threshold set at 70%. Agreement was defined as the number of participants who responded with 'agree' or 'strongly agree' to a statement, with a predefined threshold set at 70%. Open-ended text boxes allowed for qualitative feedback, which was analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High agreement was achieved across all competency categories and statements, with a mean agreement level of 86.1% and an average of 551 responses per statement. The highest agreement was found in the Communication category (mean agreement of 91.5%), while the Public Health Advocacy category had the lowest agreement (79.5%). Participants expressed strong support for the inclusion of new categories and updated statements not present in Release 1.0, particularly those emphasizing social justice, technology, and advocacy. Thematic analysis revealed widespread appreciation for the update and its enhanced focus on social justice, health equity, and Indigenous inclusion, alongside concerns about tailoring expectations based on professional roles and experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high agreement obtained from a diverse cross-section of stakeholders affirms the relevance of the revised categories and statements to contemporary and future public health practice. These findings supported the finalization of the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 2.0. Ongoing efforts will focus on engaging knowledge user groups and embedding the competencies into workforce planning, development, education, and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building the future of public health in Canada: A modified Delphi survey for updated core competencies.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa MacKay, Harman S Sandhu, Alexandra Henteleff, Mandy Walker, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Sarah E Neil-Sztramko, Malcolm Steinberg, Claire Betker\",\"doi\":\"10.17269/s41997-026-01151-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The process of updating the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 1.0, was initiated in 2023 using a multi-method approach. This included evidence syntheses, an extensive engagement process to ensure relevance to current public health challenges and a Delphi survey. The objective of this study was to assess agreement on the updated competency statements among a diverse range of public health professionals, educators, policymakers, and community representatives across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi survey was conducted in English and French to assess agreement with 68 draft competency statements across 10 categories. Eligible participants were members of the Canadian public health community who were 18 years of age or older and able to participate in either official language. Participants rated their agreement with each statement using a 6-point Likert scale, with an a priori agreement threshold set at 70%. Agreement was defined as the number of participants who responded with 'agree' or 'strongly agree' to a statement, with a predefined threshold set at 70%. Open-ended text boxes allowed for qualitative feedback, which was analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High agreement was achieved across all competency categories and statements, with a mean agreement level of 86.1% and an average of 551 responses per statement. The highest agreement was found in the Communication category (mean agreement of 91.5%), while the Public Health Advocacy category had the lowest agreement (79.5%). Participants expressed strong support for the inclusion of new categories and updated statements not present in Release 1.0, particularly those emphasizing social justice, technology, and advocacy. Thematic analysis revealed widespread appreciation for the update and its enhanced focus on social justice, health equity, and Indigenous inclusion, alongside concerns about tailoring expectations based on professional roles and experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high agreement obtained from a diverse cross-section of stakeholders affirms the relevance of the revised categories and statements to contemporary and future public health practice. These findings supported the finalization of the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 2.0. Ongoing efforts will focus on engaging knowledge user groups and embedding the competencies into workforce planning, development, education, and training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-026-01151-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-026-01151-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:采用多方法方法,于2023年启动了更新加拿大公共卫生核心能力1.0版的进程。这包括证据综合、广泛参与过程以确保与当前公共卫生挑战的相关性以及德尔菲调查。本研究的目的是评估加拿大不同范围的公共卫生专业人员、教育工作者、政策制定者和社区代表对最新能力陈述的认同程度。方法:采用一种改进的德尔菲调查,以英语和法语进行评估,以评估对10个类别的68份能力陈述草案的同意程度。符合条件的参与者是加拿大公共卫生界的成员,年满18岁,能够以官方语言参与。参与者使用6分李克特量表对他们对每个陈述的同意程度进行评分,先验同意阈值设置为70%。“同意”的定义是对某一陈述表示“同意”或“非常同意”的参与者数量,预设的阈值为70%。开放式文本框允许进行定性反馈,并对其进行主题分析。结果:在所有能力类别和陈述中都达到了高度的一致性,平均一致性水平为86.1%,平均每个陈述有551个回应。沟通类别的一致性最高(平均一致性为91.5%),而公共卫生倡导类别的一致性最低(79.5%)。与会者表示强烈支持纳入1.0版中没有的新类别和更新的声明,特别是那些强调社会正义、技术和倡导的声明。专题分析显示,人们普遍赞赏最新报告及其加强对社会正义、卫生公平和土著包容的重视,同时对根据专业角色和经验调整期望表示关切。结论:从不同的利益相关者截面获得的高度一致肯定了修订后的类别和陈述与当代和未来公共卫生实践的相关性。这些发现支持了《加拿大公共卫生核心能力》2.0版的最后定稿。正在进行的工作将侧重于吸引知识用户群体,并将能力嵌入到劳动力规划、发展、教育和培训中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building the future of public health in Canada: A modified Delphi survey for updated core competencies.

Objectives: The process of updating the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 1.0, was initiated in 2023 using a multi-method approach. This included evidence syntheses, an extensive engagement process to ensure relevance to current public health challenges and a Delphi survey. The objective of this study was to assess agreement on the updated competency statements among a diverse range of public health professionals, educators, policymakers, and community representatives across Canada.

Methods: A modified Delphi survey was conducted in English and French to assess agreement with 68 draft competency statements across 10 categories. Eligible participants were members of the Canadian public health community who were 18 years of age or older and able to participate in either official language. Participants rated their agreement with each statement using a 6-point Likert scale, with an a priori agreement threshold set at 70%. Agreement was defined as the number of participants who responded with 'agree' or 'strongly agree' to a statement, with a predefined threshold set at 70%. Open-ended text boxes allowed for qualitative feedback, which was analyzed thematically.

Results: High agreement was achieved across all competency categories and statements, with a mean agreement level of 86.1% and an average of 551 responses per statement. The highest agreement was found in the Communication category (mean agreement of 91.5%), while the Public Health Advocacy category had the lowest agreement (79.5%). Participants expressed strong support for the inclusion of new categories and updated statements not present in Release 1.0, particularly those emphasizing social justice, technology, and advocacy. Thematic analysis revealed widespread appreciation for the update and its enhanced focus on social justice, health equity, and Indigenous inclusion, alongside concerns about tailoring expectations based on professional roles and experience.

Conclusion: The high agreement obtained from a diverse cross-section of stakeholders affirms the relevance of the revised categories and statements to contemporary and future public health practice. These findings supported the finalization of the Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada, Release 2.0. Ongoing efforts will focus on engaging knowledge user groups and embedding the competencies into workforce planning, development, education, and training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书