缺乏症学生参与学校功能干预的社会效度评估:现况回顾

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Megan E. Carpenter, Melinda R. Snodgrass, Virginia L. Walker, Monique Pinczynski, Ryan Harris
{"title":"缺乏症学生参与学校功能干预的社会效度评估:现况回顾","authors":"Megan E. Carpenter, Melinda R. Snodgrass, Virginia L. Walker, Monique Pinczynski, Ryan Harris","doi":"10.1177/10983007251389667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the effectiveness of function-based interventions in meeting the behavioral support needs of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities has been explored extensively, the social validity of function-based interventions from the perspective of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities has received less attention in the research literature. Therefore, our purpose was to conduct a systematic literature review of single-case function-based intervention research studies conducted in PK–12 U.S. school settings between 2006 and 2022 to understand the prevalence of the participation of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in social validity assessments. We identified 142 reports that met our inclusion criteria. Of those, only 11 included social validity assessments involving students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, suggesting a critical need to incorporate student voice in function-based intervention and explore meaningful social validity assessment practices for this student population.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participation of Students With IDD in Social Validity Assessment of Function-Based Interventions in School Settings: A Prevalence Review\",\"authors\":\"Megan E. Carpenter, Melinda R. Snodgrass, Virginia L. Walker, Monique Pinczynski, Ryan Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10983007251389667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the effectiveness of function-based interventions in meeting the behavioral support needs of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities has been explored extensively, the social validity of function-based interventions from the perspective of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities has received less attention in the research literature. Therefore, our purpose was to conduct a systematic literature review of single-case function-based intervention research studies conducted in PK–12 U.S. school settings between 2006 and 2022 to understand the prevalence of the participation of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in social validity assessments. We identified 142 reports that met our inclusion criteria. Of those, only 11 included social validity assessments involving students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, suggesting a critical need to incorporate student voice in function-based intervention and explore meaningful social validity assessment practices for this student population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007251389667\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007251389667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然基于功能的干预措施在满足智力和发育障碍学生行为支持需求方面的有效性已经得到了广泛的探讨,但从智力和发育障碍学生的角度来看,基于功能的干预措施的社会效度却很少受到研究文献的关注。因此,我们的目的是对2006年至2022年间在美国幼儿园至12年级学校进行的单例功能干预研究进行系统的文献综述,以了解智力和发育障碍学生参与社会效度评估的普遍程度。我们确定了142份符合纳入标准的报告。其中,只有11项包括了涉及智力和发育障碍学生的社会效度评估,这表明迫切需要将学生的声音纳入基于功能的干预中,并为这一学生群体探索有意义的社会效度评估实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participation of Students With IDD in Social Validity Assessment of Function-Based Interventions in School Settings: A Prevalence Review
Although the effectiveness of function-based interventions in meeting the behavioral support needs of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities has been explored extensively, the social validity of function-based interventions from the perspective of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities has received less attention in the research literature. Therefore, our purpose was to conduct a systematic literature review of single-case function-based intervention research studies conducted in PK–12 U.S. school settings between 2006 and 2022 to understand the prevalence of the participation of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in social validity assessments. We identified 142 reports that met our inclusion criteria. Of those, only 11 included social validity assessments involving students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, suggesting a critical need to incorporate student voice in function-based intervention and explore meaningful social validity assessment practices for this student population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书