聋儿和重听儿童绑定语素引出任务中的反应和不反应。

IF 2.2
Erin M Ingvalson, Tina M Grieco-Calub, Mark VanDam, Lynn K Perry
{"title":"聋儿和重听儿童绑定语素引出任务中的反应和不反应。","authors":"Erin M Ingvalson, Tina M Grieco-Calub, Mark VanDam, Lynn K Perry","doi":"10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to explore the rates of bound morpheme production at two time points (T1 and T2) by deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) preschoolers and their typically hearing (TH) peers. We further sought to describe the rates and types of unscorable responses children produced.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-four DHH preschoolers and 66 TH preschoolers participated as part of a larger, ongoing longitudinal study. Children were given the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) screener, which elicits productions of the third-person singular present and past tense. TEGI screeners were given twice, spaced 6 months apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TH children produced significantly more singular present-tense and regular past-tense morphemes than cochlear implant (CI)-using children at both time points; hearing aid-using children were not significantly different from TH or CI users. All children were more accurate with the regular past tense at T2 than at T1. No interactions were significant. Examining the types of unscorable responses indicated that the DHH children were more likely to echo the prompt than TH children, particularly at T1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessments that elicit bound morpheme productions may not best capture DHH children's morphological sensitivity. When language samples are not feasible, receptive tasks may be a good alternative to probe children's knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"2209-2218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responses and Nonresponses in a Bound Morpheme Elicitation Task by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children.\",\"authors\":\"Erin M Ingvalson, Tina M Grieco-Calub, Mark VanDam, Lynn K Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to explore the rates of bound morpheme production at two time points (T1 and T2) by deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) preschoolers and their typically hearing (TH) peers. We further sought to describe the rates and types of unscorable responses children produced.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-four DHH preschoolers and 66 TH preschoolers participated as part of a larger, ongoing longitudinal study. Children were given the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) screener, which elicits productions of the third-person singular present and past tense. TEGI screeners were given twice, spaced 6 months apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TH children produced significantly more singular present-tense and regular past-tense morphemes than cochlear implant (CI)-using children at both time points; hearing aid-using children were not significantly different from TH or CI users. All children were more accurate with the regular past tense at T2 than at T1. No interactions were significant. Examining the types of unscorable responses indicated that the DHH children were more likely to echo the prompt than TH children, particularly at T1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessments that elicit bound morpheme productions may not best capture DHH children's morphological sensitivity. When language samples are not feasible, receptive tasks may be a good alternative to probe children's knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2209-2218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨聋儿和听力困难(DHH)学龄前儿童及其正常听力(TH)同龄人在两个时间点(T1和T2)的结合语素产生率。我们进一步试图描述儿童产生的不可评分反应的比率和类型。方法:64名DHH学龄前儿童和66名TH学龄前儿童参与了一项更大的、正在进行的纵向研究。孩子们接受了早期语法障碍测试(TEGI)筛选,该测试要求他们使用第三人称单数现在时和过去时。TEGI筛查两次,间隔6个月。结果:在两个时间点上,使用人工耳蜗的儿童比使用人工耳蜗的儿童产生更多的单数现在时和规则过去时语素;使用助听器的儿童与TH或CI使用者无显著差异。所有儿童在T2时对规则过去时的记忆准确度均高于T1时。没有显著的相互作用。检查不可评分的反应类型表明,DHH儿童比TH儿童更有可能响应提示,特别是在T1时。结论:引发结合语素产生的评估可能不能最好地捕捉DHH儿童的形态敏感性。当语言样本不可行时,接受性任务可能是探索儿童知识的一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responses and Nonresponses in a Bound Morpheme Elicitation Task by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children.

Purpose: We aimed to explore the rates of bound morpheme production at two time points (T1 and T2) by deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) preschoolers and their typically hearing (TH) peers. We further sought to describe the rates and types of unscorable responses children produced.

Method: Sixty-four DHH preschoolers and 66 TH preschoolers participated as part of a larger, ongoing longitudinal study. Children were given the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) screener, which elicits productions of the third-person singular present and past tense. TEGI screeners were given twice, spaced 6 months apart.

Results: TH children produced significantly more singular present-tense and regular past-tense morphemes than cochlear implant (CI)-using children at both time points; hearing aid-using children were not significantly different from TH or CI users. All children were more accurate with the regular past tense at T2 than at T1. No interactions were significant. Examining the types of unscorable responses indicated that the DHH children were more likely to echo the prompt than TH children, particularly at T1.

Conclusions: Assessments that elicit bound morpheme productions may not best capture DHH children's morphological sensitivity. When language samples are not feasible, receptive tasks may be a good alternative to probe children's knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书