HDR影像引导下近距离放疗对盆腔淋巴结区的剂量贡献——一项重新思考现代容积规划的研究。

IF 2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.109093
Akkineni Naga Prasanthi, Anil Kumar Talluri, Lakshmi Venkataramana Puriparthi, Nvn Madhusudhan Sresty, Deleep Kumar Gudipudi
{"title":"HDR影像引导下近距离放疗对盆腔淋巴结区的剂量贡献——一项重新思考现代容积规划的研究。","authors":"Akkineni Naga Prasanthi, Anil Kumar Talluri, Lakshmi Venkataramana Puriparthi, Nvn Madhusudhan Sresty, Deleep Kumar Gudipudi","doi":"10.5603/rpor.109093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have evaluated nodal dose using Point-A prescriptions or variable dose rates. However, the impact of volume-based high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy approaches remains less explored. In this study, we aimed to assess the dose contribution to the pelvic lymph nodes with volume-based (HR-CTV) prescription in comparison to point-A-based prescription during HDR brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix. This comparison has not been comprehensively evaluated in earlier literature, especially in the context of elective nodal contouring and HDR brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients with carcinoma of the cervix [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2 or higher] were included for this retrospective study. Two plans were generated on each brachytherapy scan. The first plan (point-A-based) prescribed a dose of 7 Gy to point-A, while the second plan (HR-CTV-based) prescribed the dose to the HR-CTV. Dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters were compared between both the plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HR-CTV-based plans registered safer doses to OARs. Both the plans showed noticeable dose contributions to the pelvic lymph node stations, particularly the obturator, internal iliac, and presacral stations, with the highest contribution observed in the obturator group. However, HR-CTV-based plans contributed lower doses to these nodal regions, approximately 1 Gy less to the internal iliac and obturator stations and 2 Gy less to the presacral station compared to point-A-based plans when D50 was considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HR-CTV-based plans demonstrated recognizable dose contribution to lymph nodes, although lower than the contribution by point-A-based plans. However, this modest difference can be effectively compensated by optimizing the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose while simultaneously maintaining safe organ at risk (OAR) doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13046417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose contribution from brachytherapy to the pelvic lymph nodal region during HDR image-guided brachytherapy - a study for rethinking modern volume-based planning.\",\"authors\":\"Akkineni Naga Prasanthi, Anil Kumar Talluri, Lakshmi Venkataramana Puriparthi, Nvn Madhusudhan Sresty, Deleep Kumar Gudipudi\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/rpor.109093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have evaluated nodal dose using Point-A prescriptions or variable dose rates. However, the impact of volume-based high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy approaches remains less explored. In this study, we aimed to assess the dose contribution to the pelvic lymph nodes with volume-based (HR-CTV) prescription in comparison to point-A-based prescription during HDR brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix. This comparison has not been comprehensively evaluated in earlier literature, especially in the context of elective nodal contouring and HDR brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients with carcinoma of the cervix [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2 or higher] were included for this retrospective study. Two plans were generated on each brachytherapy scan. The first plan (point-A-based) prescribed a dose of 7 Gy to point-A, while the second plan (HR-CTV-based) prescribed the dose to the HR-CTV. Dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters were compared between both the plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HR-CTV-based plans registered safer doses to OARs. Both the plans showed noticeable dose contributions to the pelvic lymph node stations, particularly the obturator, internal iliac, and presacral stations, with the highest contribution observed in the obturator group. However, HR-CTV-based plans contributed lower doses to these nodal regions, approximately 1 Gy less to the internal iliac and obturator stations and 2 Gy less to the presacral station compared to point-A-based plans when D50 was considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HR-CTV-based plans demonstrated recognizable dose contribution to lymph nodes, although lower than the contribution by point-A-based plans. However, this modest difference can be effectively compensated by optimizing the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose while simultaneously maintaining safe organ at risk (OAR) doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"133-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13046417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.109093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.109093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前的研究使用a点处方或可变剂量率来评估节点剂量。然而,基于容量的高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗方法的影响仍未得到充分探讨。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估在宫颈癌HDR近距离放疗中,体积为基础(HR-CTV)处方与点为基础处方对盆腔淋巴结的剂量贡献。在早期的文献中,这种比较没有得到全面的评估,特别是在选择性淋巴结轮廓和HDR近距离治疗的背景下。材料与方法:回顾性研究30例宫颈癌患者[国际妇产科学联合会(FIGO) IB2期及以上]。每次近距离治疗扫描生成两个计划。第一种方案(基于点)规定了7 Gy的剂量到a点,而第二种方案(基于HR-CTV)规定了剂量到HR-CTV。比较两种方案的剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数。结果:基于hr - ctv的计划对OARs的剂量更安全。两种方案对盆腔淋巴结站,特别是闭孔、髂内和骶前淋巴结站均有显著的剂量贡献,其中闭孔组的贡献最大。然而,当考虑D50时,基于hr - ctv的计划对这些淋巴结区域的剂量较低,与基于点的计划相比,对髂内和闭孔站的剂量约少1 Gy,对骶前站的剂量约少2 Gy。结论:基于hr - ctv的计划显示出可识别的剂量对淋巴结的贡献,尽管低于基于点的计划的贡献。然而,这种适度的差异可以通过优化外部放射治疗(EBRT)剂量来有效补偿,同时保持危险器官(OAR)的安全剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose contribution from brachytherapy to the pelvic lymph nodal region during HDR image-guided brachytherapy - a study for rethinking modern volume-based planning.

Background: Previous studies have evaluated nodal dose using Point-A prescriptions or variable dose rates. However, the impact of volume-based high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy approaches remains less explored. In this study, we aimed to assess the dose contribution to the pelvic lymph nodes with volume-based (HR-CTV) prescription in comparison to point-A-based prescription during HDR brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix. This comparison has not been comprehensively evaluated in earlier literature, especially in the context of elective nodal contouring and HDR brachytherapy.

Materials and methods: Thirty patients with carcinoma of the cervix [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2 or higher] were included for this retrospective study. Two plans were generated on each brachytherapy scan. The first plan (point-A-based) prescribed a dose of 7 Gy to point-A, while the second plan (HR-CTV-based) prescribed the dose to the HR-CTV. Dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters were compared between both the plans.

Results: HR-CTV-based plans registered safer doses to OARs. Both the plans showed noticeable dose contributions to the pelvic lymph node stations, particularly the obturator, internal iliac, and presacral stations, with the highest contribution observed in the obturator group. However, HR-CTV-based plans contributed lower doses to these nodal regions, approximately 1 Gy less to the internal iliac and obturator stations and 2 Gy less to the presacral station compared to point-A-based plans when D50 was considered.

Conclusions: HR-CTV-based plans demonstrated recognizable dose contribution to lymph nodes, although lower than the contribution by point-A-based plans. However, this modest difference can be effectively compensated by optimizing the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose while simultaneously maintaining safe organ at risk (OAR) doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书