便携式手持数字x线摄影在胸外伤小猎犬模型中的诊断价值。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-06 DOI:10.4274/dir.2026.263936
Gaofeng Liu, Xueqi Fang, Sujuan Cui, Li Zhou, Yong Zhang, Qingyuan Li, Xingjian Fang, Yutao Yan
{"title":"便携式手持数字x线摄影在胸外伤小猎犬模型中的诊断价值。","authors":"Gaofeng Liu, Xueqi Fang, Sujuan Cui, Li Zhou, Yong Zhang, Qingyuan Li, Xingjian Fang, Yutao Yan","doi":"10.4274/dir.2026.263936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the diagnostic value of portable handheld digital radiography (DR) in a beagle model of thoracic trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven beagles were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: the pneumothorax group (induced by intrapleural air injection at 50 mL/kg), the pleural effusion group (induced by intrapleural normal saline injection at 30 mL/kg), and the rib fracture group (created by surgical transection of the 6<sup>th</sup> rib). All animals underwent three imaging examinations in a randomized order: conventional chest X-ray, mobile DR, and portable handheld DR. Detection rates (using surgical outcomes as the gold standard), image quality, and total examination time (from positioning to image acquisition) were compared among the three modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 animals completed the full protocol (7 per group). There was no significant difference in detection rates among the three examination methods (<i>P</i> > 0.050). The image quality of both mobile DR and portable handheld DR was significantly superior to that of conventional chest X-ray (<i>P</i> = 0.021). Examination times for mobile DR (8.37 ± 0.80 minutes) and portable handheld DR (7.07 ± 0.67 minutes) were significantly shorter than for conventional chest X-ray (10.40 ± 0.96 minutes) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, portable handheld DR had a significantly shorter examination time than mobile DR (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Portable handheld DR provides detection rates comparable with mobile DR and conventional chest X-ray for thoracic trauma, with the advantages of superior image quality over conventional chest X-ray and the shortest examination time. Its user-friendly operation and high portability make it a valuable tool for emergency imaging in austere environments.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Based on diagnostic results in a beagle model of thoracic trauma, this study demonstrates that portable handheld DR can provide reliable methodological support for real-time imaging and rapid triage in harsh environments such as field and post-disaster settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"448-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13320115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of portable handheld digital radiography in a beagle model of thoracic trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Gaofeng Liu, Xueqi Fang, Sujuan Cui, Li Zhou, Yong Zhang, Qingyuan Li, Xingjian Fang, Yutao Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2026.263936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the diagnostic value of portable handheld digital radiography (DR) in a beagle model of thoracic trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven beagles were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: the pneumothorax group (induced by intrapleural air injection at 50 mL/kg), the pleural effusion group (induced by intrapleural normal saline injection at 30 mL/kg), and the rib fracture group (created by surgical transection of the 6<sup>th</sup> rib). All animals underwent three imaging examinations in a randomized order: conventional chest X-ray, mobile DR, and portable handheld DR. Detection rates (using surgical outcomes as the gold standard), image quality, and total examination time (from positioning to image acquisition) were compared among the three modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 animals completed the full protocol (7 per group). There was no significant difference in detection rates among the three examination methods (<i>P</i> > 0.050). The image quality of both mobile DR and portable handheld DR was significantly superior to that of conventional chest X-ray (<i>P</i> = 0.021). Examination times for mobile DR (8.37 ± 0.80 minutes) and portable handheld DR (7.07 ± 0.67 minutes) were significantly shorter than for conventional chest X-ray (10.40 ± 0.96 minutes) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, portable handheld DR had a significantly shorter examination time than mobile DR (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Portable handheld DR provides detection rates comparable with mobile DR and conventional chest X-ray for thoracic trauma, with the advantages of superior image quality over conventional chest X-ray and the shortest examination time. Its user-friendly operation and high portability make it a valuable tool for emergency imaging in austere environments.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Based on diagnostic results in a beagle model of thoracic trauma, this study demonstrates that portable handheld DR can provide reliable methodological support for real-time imaging and rapid triage in harsh environments such as field and post-disaster settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"448-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13320115/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.263936\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.263936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨便携式手持数字x线摄影(DR)对胸外伤小猎犬模型的诊断价值。方法:将27只beagle随机分为3个实验组:气胸组(胸腔内注射50 mL/kg的空气诱导)、胸腔积液组(胸腔内注射30 mL/kg的生理盐水诱导)和肋骨骨折组(手术切除第6根肋骨诱导)。所有动物按随机顺序进行三种影像学检查:常规胸部x线、移动DR和便携式手持DR,比较三种方式的检出率(以手术结果为金标准)、图像质量和总检查时间(从定位到图像采集)。结果:共有21只动物完成了完整的方案(每组7只)。三种检查方法的检出率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。移动DR和便携式手持DR的图像质量均显著优于常规胸部x线(P = 0.021)。移动DR检查时间(8.37±0.80 min)和便携式手持DR检查时间(7.07±0.67 min)明显短于常规胸片检查时间(10.40±0.96 min) (P < 0.001)。便携式手持DR的检查时间明显短于移动DR (P < 0.05)。结论:便携式手持DR对胸部创伤的检出率可与移动DR和常规胸片相媲美,图像质量优于常规胸片,检查时间最短。其人性化的操作和高便携性使其成为恶劣环境下应急成像的宝贵工具。临床意义:基于胸外伤小猎犬模型的诊断结果,本研究表明便携式手持式DR可以为野外和灾后等恶劣环境下的实时成像和快速分诊提供可靠的方法学支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of portable handheld digital radiography in a beagle model of thoracic trauma.

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic value of portable handheld digital radiography (DR) in a beagle model of thoracic trauma.

Methods: Twenty-seven beagles were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: the pneumothorax group (induced by intrapleural air injection at 50 mL/kg), the pleural effusion group (induced by intrapleural normal saline injection at 30 mL/kg), and the rib fracture group (created by surgical transection of the 6th rib). All animals underwent three imaging examinations in a randomized order: conventional chest X-ray, mobile DR, and portable handheld DR. Detection rates (using surgical outcomes as the gold standard), image quality, and total examination time (from positioning to image acquisition) were compared among the three modalities.

Results: A total of 21 animals completed the full protocol (7 per group). There was no significant difference in detection rates among the three examination methods (P > 0.050). The image quality of both mobile DR and portable handheld DR was significantly superior to that of conventional chest X-ray (P = 0.021). Examination times for mobile DR (8.37 ± 0.80 minutes) and portable handheld DR (7.07 ± 0.67 minutes) were significantly shorter than for conventional chest X-ray (10.40 ± 0.96 minutes) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, portable handheld DR had a significantly shorter examination time than mobile DR (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Portable handheld DR provides detection rates comparable with mobile DR and conventional chest X-ray for thoracic trauma, with the advantages of superior image quality over conventional chest X-ray and the shortest examination time. Its user-friendly operation and high portability make it a valuable tool for emergency imaging in austere environments.

Clinical significance: Based on diagnostic results in a beagle model of thoracic trauma, this study demonstrates that portable handheld DR can provide reliable methodological support for real-time imaging and rapid triage in harsh environments such as field and post-disaster settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书