Kayla N Wilkinson, Megan E Wein, Pamela J McCormick, Bridget M Ott
{"title":"使用培养与PCR检测筛选MRSA的肺炎患者万古霉素降级的时间","authors":"Kayla N Wilkinson, Megan E Wein, Pamela J McCormick, Bridget M Ott","doi":"10.1177/87551225261429822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is no published data comparing time to vancomycin de-escalation for patients with respiratory infections screened for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) with nasal culture compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). <b>Objective:</b> To compare the duration of vancomycin therapy between patients who underwent MRSA testing via culture vs PCR. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, multi-site, retrospective cohort study which included patients receiving vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pneumonia who underwent MRSA screening with either culture or PCR testing. The primary outcome was total days of vancomycin therapy. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), incidence of acute kidney injury, and time from nasal swab to vancomycin discontinuation. <b>Results:</b> A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 57 in the culture group and 63 in the PCR group. The median duration of vancomycin was significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.77 vs 1.80 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The median time from nasal swab collection to vancomycin discontinuation was also significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.29 vs 1.38 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in the median LOS or the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first study to directly compare duration of vancomycin therapy as the primary outcome for patients who underwent MRSA screening with nasal culture vs PCR. The use of MRSA PCR testing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin therapy in patients with pneumonia when compared to culture-based testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225261429822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13035682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to Vancomycin De-Escalation in Pneumonia Patients Screened for MRSA Using Culture vs PCR Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla N Wilkinson, Megan E Wein, Pamela J McCormick, Bridget M Ott\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225261429822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is no published data comparing time to vancomycin de-escalation for patients with respiratory infections screened for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) with nasal culture compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). <b>Objective:</b> To compare the duration of vancomycin therapy between patients who underwent MRSA testing via culture vs PCR. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, multi-site, retrospective cohort study which included patients receiving vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pneumonia who underwent MRSA screening with either culture or PCR testing. The primary outcome was total days of vancomycin therapy. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), incidence of acute kidney injury, and time from nasal swab to vancomycin discontinuation. <b>Results:</b> A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 57 in the culture group and 63 in the PCR group. The median duration of vancomycin was significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.77 vs 1.80 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The median time from nasal swab collection to vancomycin discontinuation was also significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.29 vs 1.38 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in the median LOS or the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first study to directly compare duration of vancomycin therapy as the primary outcome for patients who underwent MRSA screening with nasal culture vs PCR. The use of MRSA PCR testing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin therapy in patients with pneumonia when compared to culture-based testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87551225261429822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13035682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225261429822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225261429822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与聚合酶链反应(PCR)相比,没有发表的数据比较鼻腔培养筛选耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的呼吸道感染患者万古霉素降级的时间。目的:比较培养法和PCR法检测MRSA患者万古霉素治疗的持续时间。方法:这是一项机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的多地点、回顾性队列研究,其中包括接受万古霉素治疗肺炎的患者,他们接受了MRSA培养或PCR检测筛查。主要终点是万古霉素治疗的总天数。次要结局包括住院时间(LOS)、急性肾损伤发生率和从鼻拭子到万古霉素停药的时间。结果:共有120例患者符合纳入标准,其中培养组57例,PCR组63例。PCR组万古霉素的中位持续时间明显短于培养组(0.77 vs 1.80天,P < 0.001)。与培养组相比,PCR组从鼻拭子收集到万古霉素停药的中位时间也显著缩短(0.29天vs 1.38天;P < 0.001)。两组间平均LOS和急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率无差异。结论:这是第一个直接比较万古霉素治疗时间作为鼻培养和PCR筛查MRSA患者的主要结局的研究。与基于培养的检测相比,MRSA PCR检测的使用与万古霉素治疗肺炎患者的持续时间显著缩短相关。
Time to Vancomycin De-Escalation in Pneumonia Patients Screened for MRSA Using Culture vs PCR Testing.
Background: There is no published data comparing time to vancomycin de-escalation for patients with respiratory infections screened for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with nasal culture compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Objective: To compare the duration of vancomycin therapy between patients who underwent MRSA testing via culture vs PCR. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, multi-site, retrospective cohort study which included patients receiving vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pneumonia who underwent MRSA screening with either culture or PCR testing. The primary outcome was total days of vancomycin therapy. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), incidence of acute kidney injury, and time from nasal swab to vancomycin discontinuation. Results: A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 57 in the culture group and 63 in the PCR group. The median duration of vancomycin was significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.77 vs 1.80 days; P < 0.001). The median time from nasal swab collection to vancomycin discontinuation was also significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.29 vs 1.38 days; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the median LOS or the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between groups. Conclusions: This is the first study to directly compare duration of vancomycin therapy as the primary outcome for patients who underwent MRSA screening with nasal culture vs PCR. The use of MRSA PCR testing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin therapy in patients with pneumonia when compared to culture-based testing.
期刊介绍:
For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.