使用培养与PCR检测筛选MRSA的肺炎患者万古霉素降级的时间

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kayla N Wilkinson, Megan E Wein, Pamela J McCormick, Bridget M Ott
{"title":"使用培养与PCR检测筛选MRSA的肺炎患者万古霉素降级的时间","authors":"Kayla N Wilkinson, Megan E Wein, Pamela J McCormick, Bridget M Ott","doi":"10.1177/87551225261429822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is no published data comparing time to vancomycin de-escalation for patients with respiratory infections screened for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) with nasal culture compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). <b>Objective:</b> To compare the duration of vancomycin therapy between patients who underwent MRSA testing via culture vs PCR. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, multi-site, retrospective cohort study which included patients receiving vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pneumonia who underwent MRSA screening with either culture or PCR testing. The primary outcome was total days of vancomycin therapy. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), incidence of acute kidney injury, and time from nasal swab to vancomycin discontinuation. <b>Results:</b> A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 57 in the culture group and 63 in the PCR group. The median duration of vancomycin was significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.77 vs 1.80 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The median time from nasal swab collection to vancomycin discontinuation was also significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.29 vs 1.38 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in the median LOS or the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first study to directly compare duration of vancomycin therapy as the primary outcome for patients who underwent MRSA screening with nasal culture vs PCR. The use of MRSA PCR testing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin therapy in patients with pneumonia when compared to culture-based testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225261429822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13035682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to Vancomycin De-Escalation in Pneumonia Patients Screened for MRSA Using Culture vs PCR Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla N Wilkinson, Megan E Wein, Pamela J McCormick, Bridget M Ott\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225261429822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is no published data comparing time to vancomycin de-escalation for patients with respiratory infections screened for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) with nasal culture compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). <b>Objective:</b> To compare the duration of vancomycin therapy between patients who underwent MRSA testing via culture vs PCR. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, multi-site, retrospective cohort study which included patients receiving vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pneumonia who underwent MRSA screening with either culture or PCR testing. The primary outcome was total days of vancomycin therapy. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), incidence of acute kidney injury, and time from nasal swab to vancomycin discontinuation. <b>Results:</b> A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 57 in the culture group and 63 in the PCR group. The median duration of vancomycin was significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.77 vs 1.80 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The median time from nasal swab collection to vancomycin discontinuation was also significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.29 vs 1.38 days; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in the median LOS or the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first study to directly compare duration of vancomycin therapy as the primary outcome for patients who underwent MRSA screening with nasal culture vs PCR. The use of MRSA PCR testing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin therapy in patients with pneumonia when compared to culture-based testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87551225261429822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13035682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225261429822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225261429822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与聚合酶链反应(PCR)相比,没有发表的数据比较鼻腔培养筛选耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的呼吸道感染患者万古霉素降级的时间。目的:比较培养法和PCR法检测MRSA患者万古霉素治疗的持续时间。方法:这是一项机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的多地点、回顾性队列研究,其中包括接受万古霉素治疗肺炎的患者,他们接受了MRSA培养或PCR检测筛查。主要终点是万古霉素治疗的总天数。次要结局包括住院时间(LOS)、急性肾损伤发生率和从鼻拭子到万古霉素停药的时间。结果:共有120例患者符合纳入标准,其中培养组57例,PCR组63例。PCR组万古霉素的中位持续时间明显短于培养组(0.77 vs 1.80天,P < 0.001)。与培养组相比,PCR组从鼻拭子收集到万古霉素停药的中位时间也显著缩短(0.29天vs 1.38天;P < 0.001)。两组间平均LOS和急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率无差异。结论:这是第一个直接比较万古霉素治疗时间作为鼻培养和PCR筛查MRSA患者的主要结局的研究。与基于培养的检测相比,MRSA PCR检测的使用与万古霉素治疗肺炎患者的持续时间显著缩短相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time to Vancomycin De-Escalation in Pneumonia Patients Screened for MRSA Using Culture vs PCR Testing.

Background: There is no published data comparing time to vancomycin de-escalation for patients with respiratory infections screened for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with nasal culture compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Objective: To compare the duration of vancomycin therapy between patients who underwent MRSA testing via culture vs PCR. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, multi-site, retrospective cohort study which included patients receiving vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pneumonia who underwent MRSA screening with either culture or PCR testing. The primary outcome was total days of vancomycin therapy. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), incidence of acute kidney injury, and time from nasal swab to vancomycin discontinuation. Results: A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 57 in the culture group and 63 in the PCR group. The median duration of vancomycin was significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.77 vs 1.80 days; P < 0.001). The median time from nasal swab collection to vancomycin discontinuation was also significantly shorter in the PCR group compared to the culture group (0.29 vs 1.38 days; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the median LOS or the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) between groups. Conclusions: This is the first study to directly compare duration of vancomycin therapy as the primary outcome for patients who underwent MRSA screening with nasal culture vs PCR. The use of MRSA PCR testing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin therapy in patients with pneumonia when compared to culture-based testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书