国家教育机构对ESSA标题IV Part A Section 6.1.C学校条件的反应分析

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sharon Lohrmann, Laura Kern
{"title":"国家教育机构对ESSA标题IV Part A Section 6.1.C学校条件的反应分析","authors":"Sharon Lohrmann, Laura Kern","doi":"10.1177/10983007251389287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is a tiered framework that enhances the quality of learning conditions and delivers social–emotional–behavioral interventions. Positive behavior interventions and supports uses a cascade system delivery that includes resources from the federal, state, district, and local levels, including policy and its associated funding. A relevant law that impacts PBIS implementation is the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Every Student Succeeds Act considers school quality in required state-level plans and directly references multitier system of support (MTSS) and PBIS. This study analyzed the content of Section 6.1.C of U.S. state-level plans that address the reduction of bullying, overuse of discipline that removes students from the classroom, and the use of aversive behavioral interventions that compromise student health and safety. Of interest was how plans referenced PBIS/MTSS, or any tiered system. We implemented a text analysis using a consensual agreement coding process to reveal patterns. The analysis suggested that: (a) states had unique profiles of policy and strategies, (b) structuring the plans to address specific school conditions directly may yield a more intentional plan design, (c) the most frequently referenced strategy was state-sponsored products and resources, and (d) PBIS/MTSS was referenced in most narratives, but not always as a systemic way to organize interventions.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of State Education Agency Responses to ESSA Title IV Part A Section 6.1.C School Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Lohrmann, Laura Kern\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10983007251389287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is a tiered framework that enhances the quality of learning conditions and delivers social–emotional–behavioral interventions. Positive behavior interventions and supports uses a cascade system delivery that includes resources from the federal, state, district, and local levels, including policy and its associated funding. A relevant law that impacts PBIS implementation is the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Every Student Succeeds Act considers school quality in required state-level plans and directly references multitier system of support (MTSS) and PBIS. This study analyzed the content of Section 6.1.C of U.S. state-level plans that address the reduction of bullying, overuse of discipline that removes students from the classroom, and the use of aversive behavioral interventions that compromise student health and safety. Of interest was how plans referenced PBIS/MTSS, or any tiered system. We implemented a text analysis using a consensual agreement coding process to reveal patterns. The analysis suggested that: (a) states had unique profiles of policy and strategies, (b) structuring the plans to address specific school conditions directly may yield a more intentional plan design, (c) the most frequently referenced strategy was state-sponsored products and resources, and (d) PBIS/MTSS was referenced in most narratives, but not always as a systemic way to organize interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007251389287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007251389287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

积极行为干预和支持(PBIS)是一个分层的框架,可以提高学习条件的质量,并提供社会情绪行为干预。积极行为干预和支持采用级联系统交付,包括来自联邦、州、地区和地方各级的资源,包括政策及其相关资金。影响PBIS实施的相关法律是《每个学生成功法案》(ESSA)。《每个学生成功法案》将学校质量纳入所需的州级计划,并直接参考多层支持系统(MTSS)和PBIS。本研究分析了美国州级计划第6.1.C节的内容,该计划旨在减少欺凌行为,过度使用将学生赶出教室的纪律,以及使用危害学生健康和安全的厌恶行为干预。我们感兴趣的是计划如何参考PBIS/MTSS或任何分层系统。我们使用共识协议编码过程实现了文本分析,以揭示模式。分析表明:(a)各州有独特的政策和战略概况,(b)构建计划以直接解决特定的学校条件可能会产生更有意的计划设计,(c)最常被引用的战略是国家赞助的产品和资源,(d) PBIS/MTSS在大多数叙述中被引用,但并不总是作为组织干预的系统方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Analysis of State Education Agency Responses to ESSA Title IV Part A Section 6.1.C School Conditions
Positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is a tiered framework that enhances the quality of learning conditions and delivers social–emotional–behavioral interventions. Positive behavior interventions and supports uses a cascade system delivery that includes resources from the federal, state, district, and local levels, including policy and its associated funding. A relevant law that impacts PBIS implementation is the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Every Student Succeeds Act considers school quality in required state-level plans and directly references multitier system of support (MTSS) and PBIS. This study analyzed the content of Section 6.1.C of U.S. state-level plans that address the reduction of bullying, overuse of discipline that removes students from the classroom, and the use of aversive behavioral interventions that compromise student health and safety. Of interest was how plans referenced PBIS/MTSS, or any tiered system. We implemented a text analysis using a consensual agreement coding process to reveal patterns. The analysis suggested that: (a) states had unique profiles of policy and strategies, (b) structuring the plans to address specific school conditions directly may yield a more intentional plan design, (c) the most frequently referenced strategy was state-sponsored products and resources, and (d) PBIS/MTSS was referenced in most narratives, but not always as a systemic way to organize interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书