Kang Bok Lee, Andrew Hildebrandt, Nitish Patidar, Shashank Rao
{"title":"远程医疗报销与医院采用:基于因果推理方法的政策分析","authors":"Kang Bok Lee, Andrew Hildebrandt, Nitish Patidar, Shashank Rao","doi":"10.1002/joom.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There continue to be substantial differences in the quality and access to healthcare available to communities across the United States. Researchers have called this the healthcare divide. Telemedicine, a technology-mediated intervention that promises to bridge this healthcare divide, has been discussed by some as the great leveler. Policymakers, therefore, continue creating legislation that may drive hospitals to adopt telemedicine. Yet, how (or whether) such legislation achieves the goal of telemedicine adoption (and relatedly, healthcare divide reduction) is unclear. In the current study, we investigate a phased introduction of telemedicine reimbursement policies across various states in the United States between 2014 and 2019 to explore the causal effects of such policies on hospital adoption of telemedicine. Results suggest that while reimbursement policies drove the adoption of telemedicine services, this adoption was restricted to inpatient services rather than outpatient ones. We ground our investigation on extant theoretical insights from institutional isomorphism and highlight the limitations in our understanding of the adoption of telemedicine by hospitals in the country.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 2","pages":"257-278"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Telemedicine Reimbursements and Hospital Adoption: A Policy Analysis Using Causal Inference Methods\",\"authors\":\"Kang Bok Lee, Andrew Hildebrandt, Nitish Patidar, Shashank Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joom.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>There continue to be substantial differences in the quality and access to healthcare available to communities across the United States. Researchers have called this the healthcare divide. Telemedicine, a technology-mediated intervention that promises to bridge this healthcare divide, has been discussed by some as the great leveler. Policymakers, therefore, continue creating legislation that may drive hospitals to adopt telemedicine. Yet, how (or whether) such legislation achieves the goal of telemedicine adoption (and relatedly, healthcare divide reduction) is unclear. In the current study, we investigate a phased introduction of telemedicine reimbursement policies across various states in the United States between 2014 and 2019 to explore the causal effects of such policies on hospital adoption of telemedicine. Results suggest that while reimbursement policies drove the adoption of telemedicine services, this adoption was restricted to inpatient services rather than outpatient ones. We ground our investigation on extant theoretical insights from institutional isomorphism and highlight the limitations in our understanding of the adoption of telemedicine by hospitals in the country.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"257-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Telemedicine Reimbursements and Hospital Adoption: A Policy Analysis Using Causal Inference Methods
There continue to be substantial differences in the quality and access to healthcare available to communities across the United States. Researchers have called this the healthcare divide. Telemedicine, a technology-mediated intervention that promises to bridge this healthcare divide, has been discussed by some as the great leveler. Policymakers, therefore, continue creating legislation that may drive hospitals to adopt telemedicine. Yet, how (or whether) such legislation achieves the goal of telemedicine adoption (and relatedly, healthcare divide reduction) is unclear. In the current study, we investigate a phased introduction of telemedicine reimbursement policies across various states in the United States between 2014 and 2019 to explore the causal effects of such policies on hospital adoption of telemedicine. Results suggest that while reimbursement policies drove the adoption of telemedicine services, this adoption was restricted to inpatient services rather than outpatient ones. We ground our investigation on extant theoretical insights from institutional isomorphism and highlight the limitations in our understanding of the adoption of telemedicine by hospitals in the country.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement.
JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough.
Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification.
JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.