从手动到自动化:在500l管藻光生物反应器中培养盐红单胞菌的手动、标准稀释和比例积分控制的比较研究

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Per M. Jepsen, Morten Rhiger, Caroline R. Westergaard
{"title":"从手动到自动化:在500l管藻光生物反应器中培养盐红单胞菌的手动、标准稀释和比例积分控制的比较研究","authors":"Per M. Jepsen,&nbsp;Morten Rhiger,&nbsp;Caroline R. Westergaard","doi":"10.1155/are/2232484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient production of high-quality microalgae is essential for marine aquaculture, yet large-scale cultivation of the cryptophyte <i>Rhodomonas salina</i> remains labor-intensive and technically challenging. In this study, a 500-L tubular photobioreactor (PBR) was evaluated and compared three control strategies—manual control, a programmed standard dilution control, and a proportional–integral (PI) control—for continuous cultivation of <i>R. salina</i> targeting a setpoint of 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells mL<sup>−1</sup>. A no-control experiment was first conducted to determine the carrying capacity of the PBR and establish the operational setpoint. The growth, cell yield, pigment content, fatty-acid composition, and inorganic nutrients were quantified across experiments. Incident irradiance was held constant (105 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), while in-reactor irradiance varied with cell density (26–42 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). Growth rates were comparable across control systems (0.25–0.33 day<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that automation did not negatively affect microalgal performance. However, daily harvested biomass differed substantially: the PI control system yielded the highest production (1.27 × 10<sup>11</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding manual control (5.33 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i>  &lt; 0.05), while standard dilution control produced the lowest yield (3.28 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>). Both automated systems maintained stable cell densities with limited overshoot, though the PI controller exhibited moderate oscillations. Pigment (phycoerythrin, chlorophyll [Chl]-a, and Chl-c) and fatty-acid profiles (notably high EPA and DHA content) remained consistent across treatments, indicating no adverse effects of automation on microalgal quality. Nutrient concentrations suggested non-limiting conditions throughout. Overall, automation improved operational consistency and reduced manual workload. While both automated systems performed well, the PI controller delivered the highest yield and maintained culture stability at the desired setpoint. In conclusion the PI-based dilution control is the most promising approach for large-scale <i>R. salina</i> production, and further improvements for future PBR automation are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":8104,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/are/2232484","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Manual to Automation: A Comparative Study of Manual, Standard Dilution, and Proportional–Integral Controls for Cultivation of Rhodomonas salina in a 500 L Tubular Alga Photobioreactor\",\"authors\":\"Per M. Jepsen,&nbsp;Morten Rhiger,&nbsp;Caroline R. Westergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/are/2232484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Efficient production of high-quality microalgae is essential for marine aquaculture, yet large-scale cultivation of the cryptophyte <i>Rhodomonas salina</i> remains labor-intensive and technically challenging. In this study, a 500-L tubular photobioreactor (PBR) was evaluated and compared three control strategies—manual control, a programmed standard dilution control, and a proportional–integral (PI) control—for continuous cultivation of <i>R. salina</i> targeting a setpoint of 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells mL<sup>−1</sup>. A no-control experiment was first conducted to determine the carrying capacity of the PBR and establish the operational setpoint. The growth, cell yield, pigment content, fatty-acid composition, and inorganic nutrients were quantified across experiments. Incident irradiance was held constant (105 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), while in-reactor irradiance varied with cell density (26–42 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). Growth rates were comparable across control systems (0.25–0.33 day<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that automation did not negatively affect microalgal performance. However, daily harvested biomass differed substantially: the PI control system yielded the highest production (1.27 × 10<sup>11</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding manual control (5.33 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i>  &lt; 0.05), while standard dilution control produced the lowest yield (3.28 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>). Both automated systems maintained stable cell densities with limited overshoot, though the PI controller exhibited moderate oscillations. Pigment (phycoerythrin, chlorophyll [Chl]-a, and Chl-c) and fatty-acid profiles (notably high EPA and DHA content) remained consistent across treatments, indicating no adverse effects of automation on microalgal quality. Nutrient concentrations suggested non-limiting conditions throughout. Overall, automation improved operational consistency and reduced manual workload. While both automated systems performed well, the PI controller delivered the highest yield and maintained culture stability at the desired setpoint. In conclusion the PI-based dilution control is the most promising approach for large-scale <i>R. salina</i> production, and further improvements for future PBR automation are outlined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture Research\",\"volume\":\"2026 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/are/2232484\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/are/2232484\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/are/2232484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高效生产高质量的微藻对海洋水产养殖至关重要,但大规模种植隐藻红单胞菌仍然是劳动密集型的,技术上具有挑战性。在本研究中,对500 l管状光生物反应器(PBR)进行了评估,并比较了手动控制、编程标准稀释控制和比例积分(PI)控制三种控制策略,以1 × 106个细胞mL−1为设定值,连续培养盐藻。首先进行了无控制实验,确定了PBR的承载能力,并建立了运行设定值。在实验中对生长、细胞产量、色素含量、脂肪酸组成和无机营养成分进行了量化。入射辐照度保持恒定(105µmol m−2 s−1),而反应器内辐照度随细胞密度变化(26-42µmol m−2 s−1)。不同控制系统的生长速率具有可比性(0.25-0.33天−1),表明自动化不会对微藻的性能产生负面影响。然而,每天收获的生物量差异很大:PI控制系统产量最高(1.27 × 1011个细胞/天),显著超过手动控制(5.33 × 1010个细胞/天;p < 0.05),而标准稀释控制产量最低(3.28 × 1010个细胞/天)。尽管PI控制器表现出适度的振荡,但两个自动化系统都保持稳定的电池密度和有限的超调。色素(藻红蛋白、叶绿素[Chl]-a和Chl-c)和脂肪酸谱(特别是高EPA和DHA含量)在不同处理中保持一致,表明自动化对微藻质量没有不利影响。营养物质浓度表明整个过程中没有限制条件。总体而言,自动化提高了操作一致性并减少了人工工作量。虽然两种自动化系统都表现良好,但PI控制器的产量最高,并保持了所需设定点的培养稳定性。综上所述,基于pi的稀释控制是大规模生产盐碱鱼最有希望的方法,并概述了未来PBR自动化的进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From Manual to Automation: A Comparative Study of Manual, Standard Dilution, and Proportional–Integral Controls for Cultivation of Rhodomonas salina in a 500 L Tubular Alga Photobioreactor

From Manual to Automation: A Comparative Study of Manual, Standard Dilution, and Proportional–Integral Controls for Cultivation of Rhodomonas salina in a 500 L Tubular Alga Photobioreactor

Efficient production of high-quality microalgae is essential for marine aquaculture, yet large-scale cultivation of the cryptophyte Rhodomonas salina remains labor-intensive and technically challenging. In this study, a 500-L tubular photobioreactor (PBR) was evaluated and compared three control strategies—manual control, a programmed standard dilution control, and a proportional–integral (PI) control—for continuous cultivation of R. salina targeting a setpoint of 1 × 106 cells mL−1. A no-control experiment was first conducted to determine the carrying capacity of the PBR and establish the operational setpoint. The growth, cell yield, pigment content, fatty-acid composition, and inorganic nutrients were quantified across experiments. Incident irradiance was held constant (105 µmol m−2 s−1), while in-reactor irradiance varied with cell density (26–42 µmol m−2 s−1). Growth rates were comparable across control systems (0.25–0.33 day−1), indicating that automation did not negatively affect microalgal performance. However, daily harvested biomass differed substantially: the PI control system yielded the highest production (1.27 × 1011 cells day−1), significantly exceeding manual control (5.33 × 1010 cells day−1; p  < 0.05), while standard dilution control produced the lowest yield (3.28 × 1010 cells day−1). Both automated systems maintained stable cell densities with limited overshoot, though the PI controller exhibited moderate oscillations. Pigment (phycoerythrin, chlorophyll [Chl]-a, and Chl-c) and fatty-acid profiles (notably high EPA and DHA content) remained consistent across treatments, indicating no adverse effects of automation on microalgal quality. Nutrient concentrations suggested non-limiting conditions throughout. Overall, automation improved operational consistency and reduced manual workload. While both automated systems performed well, the PI controller delivered the highest yield and maintained culture stability at the desired setpoint. In conclusion the PI-based dilution control is the most promising approach for large-scale R. salina production, and further improvements for future PBR automation are outlined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture Research
Aquaculture Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
464
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: International in perspective, Aquaculture Research is published 12 times a year and specifically addresses research and reference needs of all working and studying within the many varied areas of aquaculture. The Journal regularly publishes papers on applied or scientific research relevant to freshwater, brackish, and marine aquaculture. It covers all aquatic organisms, floristic and faunistic, related directly or indirectly to human consumption. The journal also includes review articles, short communications and technical papers. Young scientists are particularly encouraged to submit short communications based on their own research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书