Per M. Jepsen, Morten Rhiger, Caroline R. Westergaard
{"title":"从手动到自动化:在500l管藻光生物反应器中培养盐红单胞菌的手动、标准稀释和比例积分控制的比较研究","authors":"Per M. Jepsen, Morten Rhiger, Caroline R. Westergaard","doi":"10.1155/are/2232484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient production of high-quality microalgae is essential for marine aquaculture, yet large-scale cultivation of the cryptophyte <i>Rhodomonas salina</i> remains labor-intensive and technically challenging. In this study, a 500-L tubular photobioreactor (PBR) was evaluated and compared three control strategies—manual control, a programmed standard dilution control, and a proportional–integral (PI) control—for continuous cultivation of <i>R. salina</i> targeting a setpoint of 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells mL<sup>−1</sup>. A no-control experiment was first conducted to determine the carrying capacity of the PBR and establish the operational setpoint. The growth, cell yield, pigment content, fatty-acid composition, and inorganic nutrients were quantified across experiments. Incident irradiance was held constant (105 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), while in-reactor irradiance varied with cell density (26–42 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). Growth rates were comparable across control systems (0.25–0.33 day<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that automation did not negatively affect microalgal performance. However, daily harvested biomass differed substantially: the PI control system yielded the highest production (1.27 × 10<sup>11</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding manual control (5.33 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.05), while standard dilution control produced the lowest yield (3.28 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>). Both automated systems maintained stable cell densities with limited overshoot, though the PI controller exhibited moderate oscillations. Pigment (phycoerythrin, chlorophyll [Chl]-a, and Chl-c) and fatty-acid profiles (notably high EPA and DHA content) remained consistent across treatments, indicating no adverse effects of automation on microalgal quality. Nutrient concentrations suggested non-limiting conditions throughout. Overall, automation improved operational consistency and reduced manual workload. While both automated systems performed well, the PI controller delivered the highest yield and maintained culture stability at the desired setpoint. In conclusion the PI-based dilution control is the most promising approach for large-scale <i>R. salina</i> production, and further improvements for future PBR automation are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":8104,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/are/2232484","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Manual to Automation: A Comparative Study of Manual, Standard Dilution, and Proportional–Integral Controls for Cultivation of Rhodomonas salina in a 500 L Tubular Alga Photobioreactor\",\"authors\":\"Per M. Jepsen, Morten Rhiger, Caroline R. Westergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/are/2232484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Efficient production of high-quality microalgae is essential for marine aquaculture, yet large-scale cultivation of the cryptophyte <i>Rhodomonas salina</i> remains labor-intensive and technically challenging. In this study, a 500-L tubular photobioreactor (PBR) was evaluated and compared three control strategies—manual control, a programmed standard dilution control, and a proportional–integral (PI) control—for continuous cultivation of <i>R. salina</i> targeting a setpoint of 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells mL<sup>−1</sup>. A no-control experiment was first conducted to determine the carrying capacity of the PBR and establish the operational setpoint. The growth, cell yield, pigment content, fatty-acid composition, and inorganic nutrients were quantified across experiments. Incident irradiance was held constant (105 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), while in-reactor irradiance varied with cell density (26–42 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). Growth rates were comparable across control systems (0.25–0.33 day<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that automation did not negatively affect microalgal performance. However, daily harvested biomass differed substantially: the PI control system yielded the highest production (1.27 × 10<sup>11</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding manual control (5.33 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.05), while standard dilution control produced the lowest yield (3.28 × 10<sup>10</sup> cells day<sup>−1</sup>). Both automated systems maintained stable cell densities with limited overshoot, though the PI controller exhibited moderate oscillations. Pigment (phycoerythrin, chlorophyll [Chl]-a, and Chl-c) and fatty-acid profiles (notably high EPA and DHA content) remained consistent across treatments, indicating no adverse effects of automation on microalgal quality. Nutrient concentrations suggested non-limiting conditions throughout. Overall, automation improved operational consistency and reduced manual workload. While both automated systems performed well, the PI controller delivered the highest yield and maintained culture stability at the desired setpoint. In conclusion the PI-based dilution control is the most promising approach for large-scale <i>R. salina</i> production, and further improvements for future PBR automation are outlined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture Research\",\"volume\":\"2026 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/are/2232484\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/are/2232484\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/are/2232484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Manual to Automation: A Comparative Study of Manual, Standard Dilution, and Proportional–Integral Controls for Cultivation of Rhodomonas salina in a 500 L Tubular Alga Photobioreactor
Efficient production of high-quality microalgae is essential for marine aquaculture, yet large-scale cultivation of the cryptophyte Rhodomonas salina remains labor-intensive and technically challenging. In this study, a 500-L tubular photobioreactor (PBR) was evaluated and compared three control strategies—manual control, a programmed standard dilution control, and a proportional–integral (PI) control—for continuous cultivation of R. salina targeting a setpoint of 1 × 106 cells mL−1. A no-control experiment was first conducted to determine the carrying capacity of the PBR and establish the operational setpoint. The growth, cell yield, pigment content, fatty-acid composition, and inorganic nutrients were quantified across experiments. Incident irradiance was held constant (105 µmol m−2 s−1), while in-reactor irradiance varied with cell density (26–42 µmol m−2 s−1). Growth rates were comparable across control systems (0.25–0.33 day−1), indicating that automation did not negatively affect microalgal performance. However, daily harvested biomass differed substantially: the PI control system yielded the highest production (1.27 × 1011 cells day−1), significantly exceeding manual control (5.33 × 1010 cells day−1; p < 0.05), while standard dilution control produced the lowest yield (3.28 × 1010 cells day−1). Both automated systems maintained stable cell densities with limited overshoot, though the PI controller exhibited moderate oscillations. Pigment (phycoerythrin, chlorophyll [Chl]-a, and Chl-c) and fatty-acid profiles (notably high EPA and DHA content) remained consistent across treatments, indicating no adverse effects of automation on microalgal quality. Nutrient concentrations suggested non-limiting conditions throughout. Overall, automation improved operational consistency and reduced manual workload. While both automated systems performed well, the PI controller delivered the highest yield and maintained culture stability at the desired setpoint. In conclusion the PI-based dilution control is the most promising approach for large-scale R. salina production, and further improvements for future PBR automation are outlined.
期刊介绍:
International in perspective, Aquaculture Research is published 12 times a year and specifically addresses research and reference needs of all working and studying within the many varied areas of aquaculture. The Journal regularly publishes papers on applied or scientific research relevant to freshwater, brackish, and marine aquaculture. It covers all aquatic organisms, floristic and faunistic, related directly or indirectly to human consumption. The journal also includes review articles, short communications and technical papers. Young scientists are particularly encouraged to submit short communications based on their own research.