妇女、和平与安全:通过国家行动计划评估联合国安理会第1325号决议的影响

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Sudipto Mondal
{"title":"妇女、和平与安全:通过国家行动计划评估联合国安理会第1325号决议的影响","authors":"Sudipto Mondal","doi":"10.1111/dpr.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda, derived from United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325, serves as a crucial framework for addressing the gendered dimensions of conflict and peacebuilding. Despite the adoption of National Action Plans (NAPs) by over 100 countries, the implementation of UNSCR 1325 remains uneven, with persistent challenges that include limited funding, weak accountability mechanisms, and deeply ingrained cultural resistance. This study is thus motivated by the urgent need to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of NAPs in achieving the goals of UNSCR 1325 and to identify actionable strategies to strengthen their implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This research aims to meticulously assess the implementation of NAPs across selected countries, identifying both exemplary best practices and formidable challenges. Ultimately, its purpose is to provide concrete policy recommendations to enhance effectiveness. The central research question guiding this study is: how effective are NAPs in implementing the provisions of UNSCR 1325, and what are the key factors for their success or failure?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach and methods</h3>\n \n <p>A robust mixed-methods approach is employed, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis to gain a comprehensive understanding. This involves in-depth case studies of NAP implementation in Liberia, the Philippines, Norway, and Iraq, drawing extensively on publicly available policy documents, official reports, and pertinent indicators from the Global WPS Index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The study reveals that while NAPs have demonstrably advanced gender-sensitive policies in some contexts, their overall effectiveness is significantly hindered by persistent structural barriers, chronic lack of dedicated funding, and weak accountability mechanisms. Women, in particular, remain consistently underrepresented in peace processes, and gender-based violence regrettably persists as a pervasive issue in conflict zones. Conversely, countries that exhibit strong political will, ensure adequate funding and foster inclusive stakeholder engagement have shown significant progress in implementing their NAPs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>The findings unequivocally highlight the critical need for increased funding, the establishment of stronger accountability mechanisms, and comprehensive legal and institutional reforms to genuinely promote gender equality. Policy-makers must strategically prioritize women's full and meaningful participation in peace processes, proactively address entrenched cultural resistance, and improve international cooperation to bolster the effective implementation of NAPs. These concerted efforts are indispensable to realize the transformative goals of the WPS agenda and to promote the creation of more inclusive and sustainable peace worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women, Peace, and Security: Evaluating the impact of UNSCR 1325 through National Action Plans\",\"authors\":\"Sudipto Mondal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dpr.70064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Motivation</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda, derived from United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325, serves as a crucial framework for addressing the gendered dimensions of conflict and peacebuilding. Despite the adoption of National Action Plans (NAPs) by over 100 countries, the implementation of UNSCR 1325 remains uneven, with persistent challenges that include limited funding, weak accountability mechanisms, and deeply ingrained cultural resistance. This study is thus motivated by the urgent need to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of NAPs in achieving the goals of UNSCR 1325 and to identify actionable strategies to strengthen their implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research aims to meticulously assess the implementation of NAPs across selected countries, identifying both exemplary best practices and formidable challenges. Ultimately, its purpose is to provide concrete policy recommendations to enhance effectiveness. The central research question guiding this study is: how effective are NAPs in implementing the provisions of UNSCR 1325, and what are the key factors for their success or failure?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A robust mixed-methods approach is employed, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis to gain a comprehensive understanding. This involves in-depth case studies of NAP implementation in Liberia, the Philippines, Norway, and Iraq, drawing extensively on publicly available policy documents, official reports, and pertinent indicators from the Global WPS Index.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study reveals that while NAPs have demonstrably advanced gender-sensitive policies in some contexts, their overall effectiveness is significantly hindered by persistent structural barriers, chronic lack of dedicated funding, and weak accountability mechanisms. Women, in particular, remain consistently underrepresented in peace processes, and gender-based violence regrettably persists as a pervasive issue in conflict zones. Conversely, countries that exhibit strong political will, ensure adequate funding and foster inclusive stakeholder engagement have shown significant progress in implementing their NAPs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings unequivocally highlight the critical need for increased funding, the establishment of stronger accountability mechanisms, and comprehensive legal and institutional reforms to genuinely promote gender equality. Policy-makers must strategically prioritize women's full and meaningful participation in peace processes, proactively address entrenched cultural resistance, and improve international cooperation to bolster the effective implementation of NAPs. These concerted efforts are indispensable to realize the transformative goals of the WPS agenda and to promote the creation of more inclusive and sustainable peace worldwide.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《妇女、和平与安全》议程源自联合国安理会第1325号决议,是解决冲突与建设和平中性别层面问题的重要框架。尽管有100多个国家通过了国家行动计划(nap),但联合国安理会第1325号决议的执行情况仍然参差参差,面临资金有限、问责机制薄弱和根深蒂固的文化阻力等持续挑战。因此,迫切需要严格评估国家行动计划在实现联合国安理会第1325号决议目标方面的有效性,并确定加强其实施的可行战略,从而推动了这项研究。本研究旨在仔细评估选定国家实施国家行动计划的情况,确定可示范的最佳做法和艰巨的挑战。其最终目的是提供具体的政策建议,以提高效率。指导本研究的中心研究问题是:国家行动计划在执行联合国安理会第1325号决议规定方面的效果如何?决定其成功或失败的关键因素是什么?方法和方法采用稳健的混合方法,将定性和定量分析相结合,以获得全面的理解。这涉及对利比里亚、菲律宾、挪威和伊拉克实施国家行动计划的深入案例研究,广泛借鉴公开的政策文件、官方报告和全球国家行动计划指数的相关指标。研究结果表明,虽然国家行动计划在某些情况下明显推进了对性别问题敏感的政策,但其总体有效性受到持续的结构性障碍、长期缺乏专门资金和问责机制薄弱的严重阻碍。特别是妇女在和平进程中的代表性一直不足,令人遗憾的是,基于性别的暴力仍然是冲突地区普遍存在的问题。相反,表现出强烈政治意愿、确保充足资金并促进包容性利益攸关方参与的国家在实施国家行动计划方面取得了重大进展。调查结果明确强调,迫切需要增加资金,建立更强有力的问责机制,并进行全面的法律和体制改革,以真正促进性别平等。决策者必须在战略上优先考虑妇女充分和有意义地参与和平进程,积极解决根深蒂固的文化阻力,并改善国际合作,以促进国家行动计划的有效实施。这些协调一致的努力对于实现《世界和平行动纲领》的变革性目标和促进在全世界建立更加包容和可持续的和平是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women, Peace, and Security: Evaluating the impact of UNSCR 1325 through National Action Plans

Motivation

The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda, derived from United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325, serves as a crucial framework for addressing the gendered dimensions of conflict and peacebuilding. Despite the adoption of National Action Plans (NAPs) by over 100 countries, the implementation of UNSCR 1325 remains uneven, with persistent challenges that include limited funding, weak accountability mechanisms, and deeply ingrained cultural resistance. This study is thus motivated by the urgent need to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of NAPs in achieving the goals of UNSCR 1325 and to identify actionable strategies to strengthen their implementation.

Purpose

This research aims to meticulously assess the implementation of NAPs across selected countries, identifying both exemplary best practices and formidable challenges. Ultimately, its purpose is to provide concrete policy recommendations to enhance effectiveness. The central research question guiding this study is: how effective are NAPs in implementing the provisions of UNSCR 1325, and what are the key factors for their success or failure?

Approach and methods

A robust mixed-methods approach is employed, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis to gain a comprehensive understanding. This involves in-depth case studies of NAP implementation in Liberia, the Philippines, Norway, and Iraq, drawing extensively on publicly available policy documents, official reports, and pertinent indicators from the Global WPS Index.

Findings

The study reveals that while NAPs have demonstrably advanced gender-sensitive policies in some contexts, their overall effectiveness is significantly hindered by persistent structural barriers, chronic lack of dedicated funding, and weak accountability mechanisms. Women, in particular, remain consistently underrepresented in peace processes, and gender-based violence regrettably persists as a pervasive issue in conflict zones. Conversely, countries that exhibit strong political will, ensure adequate funding and foster inclusive stakeholder engagement have shown significant progress in implementing their NAPs.

Policy implications

The findings unequivocally highlight the critical need for increased funding, the establishment of stronger accountability mechanisms, and comprehensive legal and institutional reforms to genuinely promote gender equality. Policy-makers must strategically prioritize women's full and meaningful participation in peace processes, proactively address entrenched cultural resistance, and improve international cooperation to bolster the effective implementation of NAPs. These concerted efforts are indispensable to realize the transformative goals of the WPS agenda and to promote the creation of more inclusive and sustainable peace worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书