鲁维埃沟解剖及其对腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间和并发症的影响:一项纵向观察研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Srinivasa Swamy Bandaru, Ahmed Omer Maasher, Yasir Adam Fadlalla, Qahtan Ahmed Al Dulaimi, Somar Sleman Ajeka, Fadi Hassan Al Masalmeh, Chaitanya Garg, Pawan Sah, Mohammed Omara, Abubaker Elawad, Udithi Bandaru
{"title":"鲁维埃沟解剖及其对腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间和并发症的影响:一项纵向观察研究。","authors":"Srinivasa Swamy Bandaru, Ahmed Omer Maasher, Yasir Adam Fadlalla, Qahtan Ahmed Al Dulaimi, Somar Sleman Ajeka, Fadi Hassan Al Masalmeh, Chaitanya Garg, Pawan Sah, Mohammed Omara, Abubaker Elawad, Udithi Bandaru","doi":"10.1177/10926429261435976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rouviere's sulcus (RS) is widely regarded as an important extra biliary landmark during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), yet its visibility, anatomical variability, and true impact on operative safety remain debated. This study evaluates RS morphology, its incidence of absence, and its influence on operative metrics and complications in a 2-year cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal observational study was conducted at a single public hospital in the United Arab Emirates, including all elective and emergency LC cases from 2024 to 2025. Electronic medical records and operative videos were reviewed to document RS type, presence or absence, critical view (CV) dissection time, total operative time, and perioperative complications. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, χ<sup>2</sup>/Fisher's exact tests, and Spearman correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 130 LC cases, RS was identifiable in 85.4%, with 14.6% absence (95% CI: 9.56-21.70). RS morphology (open, slit, scar, and closed) showed no significant effect on CV dissection or operative time (<i>P</i> > .08). However, RS absence was associated with a significantly longer CV dissection time (median 20 versus 18 minutes; <i>P</i> = .030), while the increase in operative time did not reach significance. Demographic factors and comorbidities showed no association with RS type or visibility. Complications were infrequent (4.6%) and unrelated to RS presence. CV dissection time strongly correlated with total operative duration (ρ = 0.834).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RS was present in most patients, and its absence modestly prolonged CT dissection but did not significantly affect overall operative time or complication rates. While RS can aid orientation, it should complement rather than replace established safety strategies such as the Critical View of Safety and bailout techniques. Multicenter studies are warranted to further clarify the clinical utility of RS morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"440-444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rouviere's Sulcus Anatomy and Its Overall Impact on Operative Time and Complications in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Longitudinal Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Srinivasa Swamy Bandaru, Ahmed Omer Maasher, Yasir Adam Fadlalla, Qahtan Ahmed Al Dulaimi, Somar Sleman Ajeka, Fadi Hassan Al Masalmeh, Chaitanya Garg, Pawan Sah, Mohammed Omara, Abubaker Elawad, Udithi Bandaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10926429261435976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rouviere's sulcus (RS) is widely regarded as an important extra biliary landmark during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), yet its visibility, anatomical variability, and true impact on operative safety remain debated. This study evaluates RS morphology, its incidence of absence, and its influence on operative metrics and complications in a 2-year cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal observational study was conducted at a single public hospital in the United Arab Emirates, including all elective and emergency LC cases from 2024 to 2025. Electronic medical records and operative videos were reviewed to document RS type, presence or absence, critical view (CV) dissection time, total operative time, and perioperative complications. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, χ<sup>2</sup>/Fisher's exact tests, and Spearman correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 130 LC cases, RS was identifiable in 85.4%, with 14.6% absence (95% CI: 9.56-21.70). RS morphology (open, slit, scar, and closed) showed no significant effect on CV dissection or operative time (<i>P</i> > .08). However, RS absence was associated with a significantly longer CV dissection time (median 20 versus 18 minutes; <i>P</i> = .030), while the increase in operative time did not reach significance. Demographic factors and comorbidities showed no association with RS type or visibility. Complications were infrequent (4.6%) and unrelated to RS presence. CV dissection time strongly correlated with total operative duration (ρ = 0.834).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RS was present in most patients, and its absence modestly prolonged CT dissection but did not significantly affect overall operative time or complication rates. While RS can aid orientation, it should complement rather than replace established safety strategies such as the Critical View of Safety and bailout techniques. Multicenter studies are warranted to further clarify the clinical utility of RS morphology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"440-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261435976\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261435976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Rouviere沟(RS)被广泛认为是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中重要的胆外标志,但其可见性、解剖变异性以及对手术安全性的真正影响仍存在争议。本研究在2年队列中评估RS形态学、缺失发生率及其对手术指标和并发症的影响。方法:在阿拉伯联合酋长国的一家公立医院进行纵向观察研究,包括2024年至2025年期间所有的选择性和急诊LC病例。回顾电子病历和手术视频,记录RS类型、是否存在、关键视图(CV)解剖时间、总手术时间和围手术期并发症。统计分析包括Kruskal-Wallis、Mann-Whitney U、χ2/Fisher精确检验和Spearman相关。结果:在130例LC中,85.4%的患者可确诊RS, 14.6%的患者未确诊RS (95% CI: 9.56 ~ 21.70)。RS形态学(开放、狭缝、瘢痕和闭合)对心血管解剖和手术时间无显著影响(P < 0.05)。然而,RS缺失与更长的心血管解剖时间相关(中位20分钟vs 18分钟;P = 0.030),而手术时间的增加没有达到显著性。人口统计学因素和合并症与RS类型或可见度无关。并发症不常见(4.6%),与RS的存在无关。心血管解剖时间与总手术时间密切相关(ρ = 0.834)。结论:RS在大多数患者中存在,其缺失适度延长了CT剥离时间,但对总手术时间和并发症发生率无显著影响。虽然RS可以帮助定位,但它应该补充而不是取代既定的安全策略,如安全的批判性观点和救助技术。多中心研究是必要的,以进一步阐明RS形态学的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rouviere's Sulcus Anatomy and Its Overall Impact on Operative Time and Complications in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Background: Rouviere's sulcus (RS) is widely regarded as an important extra biliary landmark during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), yet its visibility, anatomical variability, and true impact on operative safety remain debated. This study evaluates RS morphology, its incidence of absence, and its influence on operative metrics and complications in a 2-year cohort.

Methods: A longitudinal observational study was conducted at a single public hospital in the United Arab Emirates, including all elective and emergency LC cases from 2024 to 2025. Electronic medical records and operative videos were reviewed to document RS type, presence or absence, critical view (CV) dissection time, total operative time, and perioperative complications. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, χ2/Fisher's exact tests, and Spearman correlation.

Results: Among 130 LC cases, RS was identifiable in 85.4%, with 14.6% absence (95% CI: 9.56-21.70). RS morphology (open, slit, scar, and closed) showed no significant effect on CV dissection or operative time (P > .08). However, RS absence was associated with a significantly longer CV dissection time (median 20 versus 18 minutes; P = .030), while the increase in operative time did not reach significance. Demographic factors and comorbidities showed no association with RS type or visibility. Complications were infrequent (4.6%) and unrelated to RS presence. CV dissection time strongly correlated with total operative duration (ρ = 0.834).

Conclusions: RS was present in most patients, and its absence modestly prolonged CT dissection but did not significantly affect overall operative time or complication rates. While RS can aid orientation, it should complement rather than replace established safety strategies such as the Critical View of Safety and bailout techniques. Multicenter studies are warranted to further clarify the clinical utility of RS morphology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书