伽玛刀放射治疗原发性颈静脉孔肿瘤的疗效及影响因素分析。

IF 1.3
Huiyang Luo, Shihong Zhu, Xiyue Lu, Sijun Diao, Zhongyu Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Jing Chen
{"title":"伽玛刀放射治疗原发性颈静脉孔肿瘤的疗效及影响因素分析。","authors":"Huiyang Luo, Shihong Zhu, Xiyue Lu, Sijun Diao, Zhongyu Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Jing Chen","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_21_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a key treatment method for intracranial neoplasms, particularly primary jugular foramen tumors. The risks associated with surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy have prompted interest in GKRS, which facilitates precise, high-dose delivery with minimal collateral damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study comprised 219 patients with primary jugular foramen tumors treated from June 2014 to June 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment received: conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT, n = 103) and GKRS (n = 116). Treatment efficacy was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria 6 months post-treatment. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to identify factors affecting the treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GKRS group exhibited a significantly higher complete and partial response rates compared to the EBRT group (25.86% vs. 9.71% and 30.17% vs. 22.33%, respectively). The GKRS group showed a significantly lower rate of progressive disease (5.17% vs. 23.3%, P < 0.001) and fewer cranial nerve-related adverse effects (P = 0.008) compared to the EBRT group. The factors predicting poor GKRS efficacy included a large tumor volume, intra-/extracranial extension, and transient expansion (P = 0.005, 0.010, and 0.005, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GKRS demonstrated superior efficacy and a better safety profile than EBRT for managing primary jugular foramen tumors. Tumor type, volume, and morphology significantly influenced GKRS outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored treatment strategies based on individual tumor characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and influencing factors of gamma knife radiosurgery for primary jugular foramen tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Huiyang Luo, Shihong Zhu, Xiyue Lu, Sijun Diao, Zhongyu Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Jing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_21_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a key treatment method for intracranial neoplasms, particularly primary jugular foramen tumors. The risks associated with surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy have prompted interest in GKRS, which facilitates precise, high-dose delivery with minimal collateral damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study comprised 219 patients with primary jugular foramen tumors treated from June 2014 to June 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment received: conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT, n = 103) and GKRS (n = 116). Treatment efficacy was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria 6 months post-treatment. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to identify factors affecting the treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GKRS group exhibited a significantly higher complete and partial response rates compared to the EBRT group (25.86% vs. 9.71% and 30.17% vs. 22.33%, respectively). The GKRS group showed a significantly lower rate of progressive disease (5.17% vs. 23.3%, P < 0.001) and fewer cranial nerve-related adverse effects (P = 0.008) compared to the EBRT group. The factors predicting poor GKRS efficacy included a large tumor volume, intra-/extracranial extension, and transient expansion (P = 0.005, 0.010, and 0.005, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GKRS demonstrated superior efficacy and a better safety profile than EBRT for managing primary jugular foramen tumors. Tumor type, volume, and morphology significantly influenced GKRS outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored treatment strategies based on individual tumor characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_21_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_21_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伽玛刀放射治疗是颅内肿瘤的重要治疗方法,尤其是原发性颈静脉孔肿瘤。与手术切除和常规放疗相关的风险促使人们对GKRS产生了兴趣,GKRS有助于精确、高剂量的递送和最小的附带损伤。方法:回顾性研究2014年6月至2024年6月219例原发性颈静脉孔肿瘤患者。根据所接受的治疗将患者分为两组:常规分次外束放疗(EBRT, n = 103)和GKRS (n = 116)。治疗后6个月采用磁共振成像和实体瘤反应评价标准评价治疗效果。进行相关分析和回归分析,以确定影响治疗结果的因素。结果:GKRS组的完全缓解率和部分缓解率明显高于EBRT组(分别为25.86% vs. 9.71%和30.17% vs. 22.33%)。与EBRT组相比,GKRS组的进展性疾病发生率显著降低(5.17% vs. 23.3%, P < 0.001),脑神经相关不良反应较少(P = 0.008)。预测GKRS疗效差的因素包括肿瘤体积大、颅内/颅外扩张和短暂性扩张(P值分别为0.005、0.010和0.005)。结论:GKRS治疗原发性颈静脉孔肿瘤的疗效和安全性优于EBRT。肿瘤类型、体积和形态显著影响GKRS结果,突出了基于个体肿瘤特征定制治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy and influencing factors of gamma knife radiosurgery for primary jugular foramen tumors.

Background: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a key treatment method for intracranial neoplasms, particularly primary jugular foramen tumors. The risks associated with surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy have prompted interest in GKRS, which facilitates precise, high-dose delivery with minimal collateral damage.

Methods: This retrospective study comprised 219 patients with primary jugular foramen tumors treated from June 2014 to June 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment received: conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT, n = 103) and GKRS (n = 116). Treatment efficacy was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria 6 months post-treatment. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to identify factors affecting the treatment outcomes.

Results: The GKRS group exhibited a significantly higher complete and partial response rates compared to the EBRT group (25.86% vs. 9.71% and 30.17% vs. 22.33%, respectively). The GKRS group showed a significantly lower rate of progressive disease (5.17% vs. 23.3%, P < 0.001) and fewer cranial nerve-related adverse effects (P = 0.008) compared to the EBRT group. The factors predicting poor GKRS efficacy included a large tumor volume, intra-/extracranial extension, and transient expansion (P = 0.005, 0.010, and 0.005, respectively).

Conclusion: GKRS demonstrated superior efficacy and a better safety profile than EBRT for managing primary jugular foramen tumors. Tumor type, volume, and morphology significantly influenced GKRS outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored treatment strategies based on individual tumor characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书