预防牙种植体周围的初始骨重塑:利用德尔菲法的国际临床共识。

IF 2.5
Claudio Stacchi, Tiziano Testori, Antonio Rapani, Yoshiaki Arai, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz, Juan Blanco-Carrión, Tiago Borges, Eriberto Bressan, Luigi Canullo, Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmiño, Guo-Hao Lin, Tomas Linkevičius, Nikos Mattheos, Krisztina Mikulás, Alberto Monje, Marta Muñoz, Migue Padial-Molina, Andrea Ravidà, Rafael Siqueira, Sergio Spinato, Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo, Cristiano Tomasi, Giuseppe Troiano, Hom-Lay Wang, Teresa Lombardi
{"title":"预防牙种植体周围的初始骨重塑:利用德尔菲法的国际临床共识。","authors":"Claudio Stacchi, Tiziano Testori, Antonio Rapani, Yoshiaki Arai, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz, Juan Blanco-Carrión, Tiago Borges, Eriberto Bressan, Luigi Canullo, Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmiño, Guo-Hao Lin, Tomas Linkevičius, Nikos Mattheos, Krisztina Mikulás, Alberto Monje, Marta Muñoz, Migue Padial-Molina, Andrea Ravidà, Rafael Siqueira, Sergio Spinato, Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo, Cristiano Tomasi, Giuseppe Troiano, Hom-Lay Wang, Teresa Lombardi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish an expert consensus on the definition, diagnostic boundaries and clinical interpretation of initial bone remodelling around dental implants and identify evidence-based strategies for its prevention and management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi consensus process was conducted using an established methodology. Twenty-five internationally recognised experts in implant dentistry, identified through a structured literature search, participated anonymously. Fifteen statements were developed by a coordinating group to address the definition, clinical implications and aetiopathogenesis of initial bone remodelling. Agreement was rated on a 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as a mean score ≥ 7 and ≤ 1 outlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 25 experts completed each round. Of the 15 statements evaluated, 10 reached full consensus, one achieved near consensus and four did not reach the predefined threshold. No consensus was achieved regarding the definition, temporal reference or prognostic significance of initial bone remodelling, highlighting the persistent heterogeneity in terminology and diagnostic interpretation. In contrast, strong agreement was achieved on the biological and mechanical determinants of initial bone remodelling, including implant-abutment configuration, platform switching, peri-implant bone volume, insertion torque, soft tissue thickness and phenotype, abutment height, prosthetic emergence profile and the presence of undetected residual cement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial bone remodelling remains variably defined but is increasingly recognised as a controllable rather than an inevitable process. A shared conceptual and diagnostic framework is needed to standardise clinical interpretation, guide preventive strategies and support more rigorous future research on peri-implant bone stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"19 1","pages":"61-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of initial bone remodelling around dental implants: An international clinical consensus utilising the Delphi method.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Stacchi, Tiziano Testori, Antonio Rapani, Yoshiaki Arai, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz, Juan Blanco-Carrión, Tiago Borges, Eriberto Bressan, Luigi Canullo, Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmiño, Guo-Hao Lin, Tomas Linkevičius, Nikos Mattheos, Krisztina Mikulás, Alberto Monje, Marta Muñoz, Migue Padial-Molina, Andrea Ravidà, Rafael Siqueira, Sergio Spinato, Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo, Cristiano Tomasi, Giuseppe Troiano, Hom-Lay Wang, Teresa Lombardi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish an expert consensus on the definition, diagnostic boundaries and clinical interpretation of initial bone remodelling around dental implants and identify evidence-based strategies for its prevention and management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi consensus process was conducted using an established methodology. Twenty-five internationally recognised experts in implant dentistry, identified through a structured literature search, participated anonymously. Fifteen statements were developed by a coordinating group to address the definition, clinical implications and aetiopathogenesis of initial bone remodelling. Agreement was rated on a 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as a mean score ≥ 7 and ≤ 1 outlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 25 experts completed each round. Of the 15 statements evaluated, 10 reached full consensus, one achieved near consensus and four did not reach the predefined threshold. No consensus was achieved regarding the definition, temporal reference or prognostic significance of initial bone remodelling, highlighting the persistent heterogeneity in terminology and diagnostic interpretation. In contrast, strong agreement was achieved on the biological and mechanical determinants of initial bone remodelling, including implant-abutment configuration, platform switching, peri-implant bone volume, insertion torque, soft tissue thickness and phenotype, abutment height, prosthetic emergence profile and the presence of undetected residual cement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial bone remodelling remains variably defined but is increasingly recognised as a controllable rather than an inevitable process. A shared conceptual and diagnostic framework is needed to standardise clinical interpretation, guide preventive strategies and support more rigorous future research on peri-implant bone stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"61-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立专家对种植体周围初始骨重塑的定义、诊断界限和临床解释的共识,并确定其预防和管理的循证策略。材料和方法:采用既定的方法进行了三轮德尔菲共识过程。25位国际公认的种植牙科专家,通过结构化的文献检索确定,匿名参与。由一个协调小组制定了15项声明,以解决初始骨重塑的定义、临床意义和发病机制。共识以9分的李克特量表进行评分,共识定义为平均得分≥7分,异常值≤1分。结果:每轮25名专家均完成。在评估的15项声明中,10项达成了完全共识,1项达成了接近共识,4项未达到预定的阈值。关于初始骨重构的定义、时间参考或预后意义尚未达成共识,这突出了术语和诊断解释的持续异质性。相比之下,对于初始骨重塑的生物学和力学决定因素,包括种植体-基台配置、平台切换、种植体周围骨体积、插入扭矩、软组织厚度和表型、基台高度、假体涌现轮廓和未检测到的残余水泥的存在,我们达成了强烈的共识。结论:最初的骨重塑仍然有不同的定义,但越来越多的人认为这是一个可控的过程,而不是一个不可避免的过程。需要一个共享的概念和诊断框架来规范临床解释,指导预防策略,并支持更严格的未来种植体周围骨稳定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of initial bone remodelling around dental implants: An international clinical consensus utilising the Delphi method.

Purpose: To establish an expert consensus on the definition, diagnostic boundaries and clinical interpretation of initial bone remodelling around dental implants and identify evidence-based strategies for its prevention and management.

Materials and methods: A three-round Delphi consensus process was conducted using an established methodology. Twenty-five internationally recognised experts in implant dentistry, identified through a structured literature search, participated anonymously. Fifteen statements were developed by a coordinating group to address the definition, clinical implications and aetiopathogenesis of initial bone remodelling. Agreement was rated on a 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as a mean score ≥ 7 and ≤ 1 outlier.

Results: All 25 experts completed each round. Of the 15 statements evaluated, 10 reached full consensus, one achieved near consensus and four did not reach the predefined threshold. No consensus was achieved regarding the definition, temporal reference or prognostic significance of initial bone remodelling, highlighting the persistent heterogeneity in terminology and diagnostic interpretation. In contrast, strong agreement was achieved on the biological and mechanical determinants of initial bone remodelling, including implant-abutment configuration, platform switching, peri-implant bone volume, insertion torque, soft tissue thickness and phenotype, abutment height, prosthetic emergence profile and the presence of undetected residual cement.

Conclusions: Initial bone remodelling remains variably defined but is increasingly recognised as a controllable rather than an inevitable process. A shared conceptual and diagnostic framework is needed to standardise clinical interpretation, guide preventive strategies and support more rigorous future research on peri-implant bone stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书