使用WHO报告系统对肝细胞学进行分类:机构经验和恶性肿瘤风险评估。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Diagnostic Cytopathology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-11 DOI:10.1002/dc.70112
Saroja Devi Geetha, Amr Ali, Meena Kashi, Alexander Burke, Philip Ort, Alanna Chiu, Myungji Chun, Karen Chau, Kasturi Das, Deepika Savant
{"title":"使用WHO报告系统对肝细胞学进行分类:机构经验和恶性肿瘤风险评估。","authors":"Saroja Devi Geetha, Amr Ali, Meena Kashi, Alexander Burke, Philip Ort, Alanna Chiu, Myungji Chun, Karen Chau, Kasturi Das, Deepika Savant","doi":"10.1002/dc.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The World Health Organization's (WHO) Reporting System for Liver Cytopathology aims to standardize communication with clinicians globally to improve patient management. Our study reclassifies liver cytology reports based on the WHO classification and assesses the risk of malignancy (ROM) in each category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Liver cytology reports from 2019 to 2023 were retrieved to obtain demographic details, clinical data, cytology, and surgical follow-up (SFU). Cytology diagnoses were reclassified using the WHO classification. ROM was analyzed based on SFU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study had 976 cases, age ranged from 1-96 years, with an average age of 67 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1. Majority of lesions (400/525, 76%) were less than 5 cm. Location of the lesion was available in 595 cases, with right lobe being the most common (64%; n = 383), followed by left lobe (36%, n = 212). 883 cases (90%) underwent rapid onsite evaluation. Reclassification using the WHO classification system into 5 categories included non-diagnostic (n = 79), benign (n = 117), atypical (n = 25), suspicious for malignancy (n = 6) and malignant (n = 749). Thirty-one cases (3%) had cytology follow up, 71(7.3%) had SFU. The ROM in the SFU cohort was 17% (1/6; 95% CI: 10%-76%) in non-diagnostic, 23% (3/13, 95% CI: 15.4%-30.6%) in benign and 100% in atypical (3/3, 95% CI: 88%-100%), suspicious for malignancy (2/2, 95% CI: 50%-100%) and malignant(47/47, 95% CI: 99.5%-100%) categories. Repeat FNA yielded malignant upgrade rates of 80% (4 out of 5) in non-diagnostic and 75% (3 out of 4) in atypical categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the values of ROM in the various categories of the WHO Reporting System for Liver Cytopathology using a large cohort of cases. Repeat sampling is recommended in non-diagnostic and atypical categories based on an increase in malignant upgrades in these categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":"436-443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying Liver Cytology Using the WHO Reporting System: Institutional Experience and Malignancy Risk Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Saroja Devi Geetha, Amr Ali, Meena Kashi, Alexander Burke, Philip Ort, Alanna Chiu, Myungji Chun, Karen Chau, Kasturi Das, Deepika Savant\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The World Health Organization's (WHO) Reporting System for Liver Cytopathology aims to standardize communication with clinicians globally to improve patient management. Our study reclassifies liver cytology reports based on the WHO classification and assesses the risk of malignancy (ROM) in each category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Liver cytology reports from 2019 to 2023 were retrieved to obtain demographic details, clinical data, cytology, and surgical follow-up (SFU). Cytology diagnoses were reclassified using the WHO classification. ROM was analyzed based on SFU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study had 976 cases, age ranged from 1-96 years, with an average age of 67 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1. Majority of lesions (400/525, 76%) were less than 5 cm. Location of the lesion was available in 595 cases, with right lobe being the most common (64%; n = 383), followed by left lobe (36%, n = 212). 883 cases (90%) underwent rapid onsite evaluation. Reclassification using the WHO classification system into 5 categories included non-diagnostic (n = 79), benign (n = 117), atypical (n = 25), suspicious for malignancy (n = 6) and malignant (n = 749). Thirty-one cases (3%) had cytology follow up, 71(7.3%) had SFU. The ROM in the SFU cohort was 17% (1/6; 95% CI: 10%-76%) in non-diagnostic, 23% (3/13, 95% CI: 15.4%-30.6%) in benign and 100% in atypical (3/3, 95% CI: 88%-100%), suspicious for malignancy (2/2, 95% CI: 50%-100%) and malignant(47/47, 95% CI: 99.5%-100%) categories. Repeat FNA yielded malignant upgrade rates of 80% (4 out of 5) in non-diagnostic and 75% (3 out of 4) in atypical categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the values of ROM in the various categories of the WHO Reporting System for Liver Cytopathology using a large cohort of cases. Repeat sampling is recommended in non-diagnostic and atypical categories based on an increase in malignant upgrades in these categories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"436-443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:世界卫生组织(WHO)肝脏细胞病理学报告系统旨在规范与全球临床医生的沟通,以改善患者管理。我们的研究根据世界卫生组织的分类对肝细胞学报告进行重新分类,并评估每个类别的恶性肿瘤(ROM)风险。方法:检索2019年至2023年的肝细胞学报告,获取人口学详细信息、临床资料、细胞学和手术随访(SFU)。细胞学诊断采用WHO分类重新分类。基于SFU对ROM进行分析。结果:976例患者,年龄1 ~ 96岁,平均年龄67岁。男女比例为1:1。大多数病变(400/525,76%)小于5 cm。595例中病灶位置明确,以右肺叶最常见(64%,n = 383),其次是左肺叶(36%,n = 212)。883例(90%)进行了快速现场评估。使用WHO分类系统将其重新分类为5类,包括非诊断性(n = 79)、良性(n = 117)、非典型(n = 25)、疑似恶性(n = 6)和恶性(n = 749)。细胞学随访31例(3%),SFU 71例(7.3%)。SFU队列的非诊断性ROM为17% (1/6,95% CI: 10%-76%),良性ROM为23% (3/13,95% CI: 15.4%-30.6%),非典型(3/3,95% CI: 88%-100%),可疑恶性肿瘤(2/2,95% CI: 50%-100%)和恶性肿瘤(47/47,95% CI: 99.5%-100%)。重复FNA在非诊断性分类中恶性升级率为80%(4 / 5),在非典型分类中为75%(3 / 4)。结论:我们使用大量病例,在世界卫生组织肝细胞病理学报告系统的不同类别中呈现ROM的价值。基于这些类别恶性升级的增加,建议在非诊断性和非典型类别中重复取样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifying Liver Cytology Using the WHO Reporting System: Institutional Experience and Malignancy Risk Assessment.

Aim: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Reporting System for Liver Cytopathology aims to standardize communication with clinicians globally to improve patient management. Our study reclassifies liver cytology reports based on the WHO classification and assesses the risk of malignancy (ROM) in each category.

Methods: Liver cytology reports from 2019 to 2023 were retrieved to obtain demographic details, clinical data, cytology, and surgical follow-up (SFU). Cytology diagnoses were reclassified using the WHO classification. ROM was analyzed based on SFU.

Results: Our study had 976 cases, age ranged from 1-96 years, with an average age of 67 years. Male: female ratio was 1:1. Majority of lesions (400/525, 76%) were less than 5 cm. Location of the lesion was available in 595 cases, with right lobe being the most common (64%; n = 383), followed by left lobe (36%, n = 212). 883 cases (90%) underwent rapid onsite evaluation. Reclassification using the WHO classification system into 5 categories included non-diagnostic (n = 79), benign (n = 117), atypical (n = 25), suspicious for malignancy (n = 6) and malignant (n = 749). Thirty-one cases (3%) had cytology follow up, 71(7.3%) had SFU. The ROM in the SFU cohort was 17% (1/6; 95% CI: 10%-76%) in non-diagnostic, 23% (3/13, 95% CI: 15.4%-30.6%) in benign and 100% in atypical (3/3, 95% CI: 88%-100%), suspicious for malignancy (2/2, 95% CI: 50%-100%) and malignant(47/47, 95% CI: 99.5%-100%) categories. Repeat FNA yielded malignant upgrade rates of 80% (4 out of 5) in non-diagnostic and 75% (3 out of 4) in atypical categories.

Conclusion: We present the values of ROM in the various categories of the WHO Reporting System for Liver Cytopathology using a large cohort of cases. Repeat sampling is recommended in non-diagnostic and atypical categories based on an increase in malignant upgrades in these categories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书