联合水力荷载下的滑坡溃坝:涌浪-溢流协同作用的实验见解

IF 4.3 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Water science and engineering Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.003
Jie Liu , Ming-jian Liao , Lei Fu , Dai-xin Deng , Hong Xiao
{"title":"联合水力荷载下的滑坡溃坝:涌浪-溢流协同作用的实验见解","authors":"Jie Liu ,&nbsp;Ming-jian Liao ,&nbsp;Lei Fu ,&nbsp;Dai-xin Deng ,&nbsp;Hong Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Landslide dam breaching poses severe threats to downstream communities and infrastructure, making the understanding of their failure mechanisms under complex hydraulic conditions crucial for disaster risk mitigation. This study systematically investigated the breaching hydraulics of a landslide dam under two scenarios: (1) overflow-only conditions and (2) combined surge wave and overflow conditions, through 12 controlled flume experiments (eight small-scale and four large-scale tests). Comparative analysis revealed critical differences in dam failure characteristics. Under overflow-only conditions, the breaching process followed conventional hydraulic erosion patterns, while the combined surge–overflow scenario exhibited significantly different behaviors. Experimental results showed that surge wave action increased total discharge by 2.3–4.9 times that in overflow-only conditions, and prolonged breach development. The interaction between surge waves and overflow produced complex hydrodynamics characterized by water level fluctuations, partial blockage, and reduced flow efficiency. Whether surge waves can trigger failure of a critically overtopped landslide dam depends on simultaneous satisfaction of three conditions: (1) Δ<em>H</em> &gt; 0 (where Δ<em>H</em> is the difference between the highest surge wave level and effective dam height), (2) <em>ξ</em><sub>f</sub>/<em>W</em><sub>c</sub> &gt; 0.092 (where <em>ξ</em><sub>f</sub> is the wave height of the first surge wave overtopping the dam and <em>W</em><sub>c</sub> is the dam crest width along the flow direction), and (3) <em>N</em><sub>E</sub> &gt; 10.5 (where <em>N</em><sub>E</sub> is the number of effective secondary wave erosion events). The timing between surge arrival and overflow peak discharge predominantly controlled total outflow volume, with early surge-wave superposition causing the most severe discharge impacts. These findings provide a new quantitative framework for assessing landslide dam stability under complex loading conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23628,"journal":{"name":"Water science and engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 144-156"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landslide dam breaching under combined hydraulic loads: Experimental insights into surge–overflow synergy\",\"authors\":\"Jie Liu ,&nbsp;Ming-jian Liao ,&nbsp;Lei Fu ,&nbsp;Dai-xin Deng ,&nbsp;Hong Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Landslide dam breaching poses severe threats to downstream communities and infrastructure, making the understanding of their failure mechanisms under complex hydraulic conditions crucial for disaster risk mitigation. This study systematically investigated the breaching hydraulics of a landslide dam under two scenarios: (1) overflow-only conditions and (2) combined surge wave and overflow conditions, through 12 controlled flume experiments (eight small-scale and four large-scale tests). Comparative analysis revealed critical differences in dam failure characteristics. Under overflow-only conditions, the breaching process followed conventional hydraulic erosion patterns, while the combined surge–overflow scenario exhibited significantly different behaviors. Experimental results showed that surge wave action increased total discharge by 2.3–4.9 times that in overflow-only conditions, and prolonged breach development. The interaction between surge waves and overflow produced complex hydrodynamics characterized by water level fluctuations, partial blockage, and reduced flow efficiency. Whether surge waves can trigger failure of a critically overtopped landslide dam depends on simultaneous satisfaction of three conditions: (1) Δ<em>H</em> &gt; 0 (where Δ<em>H</em> is the difference between the highest surge wave level and effective dam height), (2) <em>ξ</em><sub>f</sub>/<em>W</em><sub>c</sub> &gt; 0.092 (where <em>ξ</em><sub>f</sub> is the wave height of the first surge wave overtopping the dam and <em>W</em><sub>c</sub> is the dam crest width along the flow direction), and (3) <em>N</em><sub>E</sub> &gt; 10.5 (where <em>N</em><sub>E</sub> is the number of effective secondary wave erosion events). The timing between surge arrival and overflow peak discharge predominantly controlled total outflow volume, with early surge-wave superposition causing the most severe discharge impacts. These findings provide a new quantitative framework for assessing landslide dam stability under complex loading conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water science and engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 144-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water science and engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237025001012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water science and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237025001012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡溃坝对下游社区和基础设施构成严重威胁,了解其在复杂水力条件下的溃坝破坏机制对减轻灾害风险至关重要。本研究通过12个控制水槽试验(8个小型试验和4个大型试验),系统研究了(1)单纯溢流和(2)涌波与溢流相结合两种情况下滑坡坝的溃坝水力特性。对比分析揭示了大坝溃坝特征的关键差异。仅溢流条件下,溃口过程遵循常规水力侵蚀模式,而浪涌-溢流联合条件下溃口行为明显不同。试验结果表明,浪涌波作用使总流量增加2.3 ~ 4.9倍,使决口发育时间延长。涌浪与溢流的相互作用产生了复杂的水动力,表现为水位波动、部分堵塞和流动效率降低。涌浪能否引发故障的严重滑坡坝越过取决于同时满足三个条件:(1)ΔH在0(ΔH是最高水击波水平之间的差异和有效的大坝高度),(2)ξf / Wc在0.092(ξf是第一涌波的波高超过大坝和Wc坝顶宽度沿流动方向),和(3)NE在10.5 (NE是有效的二级波侵蚀事件)的数量。涌浪到达和溢流峰值流量之间的时间控制了总流出量,早期涌浪叠加造成的流量影响最为严重。这些发现为评价复杂荷载条件下滑坡坝的稳定性提供了新的定量框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Landslide dam breaching under combined hydraulic loads: Experimental insights into surge–overflow synergy
Landslide dam breaching poses severe threats to downstream communities and infrastructure, making the understanding of their failure mechanisms under complex hydraulic conditions crucial for disaster risk mitigation. This study systematically investigated the breaching hydraulics of a landslide dam under two scenarios: (1) overflow-only conditions and (2) combined surge wave and overflow conditions, through 12 controlled flume experiments (eight small-scale and four large-scale tests). Comparative analysis revealed critical differences in dam failure characteristics. Under overflow-only conditions, the breaching process followed conventional hydraulic erosion patterns, while the combined surge–overflow scenario exhibited significantly different behaviors. Experimental results showed that surge wave action increased total discharge by 2.3–4.9 times that in overflow-only conditions, and prolonged breach development. The interaction between surge waves and overflow produced complex hydrodynamics characterized by water level fluctuations, partial blockage, and reduced flow efficiency. Whether surge waves can trigger failure of a critically overtopped landslide dam depends on simultaneous satisfaction of three conditions: (1) ΔH > 0 (where ΔH is the difference between the highest surge wave level and effective dam height), (2) ξf/Wc > 0.092 (where ξf is the wave height of the first surge wave overtopping the dam and Wc is the dam crest width along the flow direction), and (3) NE > 10.5 (where NE is the number of effective secondary wave erosion events). The timing between surge arrival and overflow peak discharge predominantly controlled total outflow volume, with early surge-wave superposition causing the most severe discharge impacts. These findings provide a new quantitative framework for assessing landslide dam stability under complex loading conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
573
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Science and Engineering journal is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering new concepts, theories, methods, and techniques related to water issues. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of water resources, aquatic environment, aquatic ecology, and water engineering, with emphases placed on the innovation and applicability of science and technology in large-scale hydropower project construction, large river and lake regulation, inter-basin water transfer, hydroelectric energy development, ecological restoration, the development of new materials, and sustainable utilization of water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书