{"title":"边缘矿产和关键矿产的新地缘政治","authors":"Raphael Deberdt , Jessica DiCarlo","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The new resource geopolitics is not solely a race against China; it is a test of foresight, adaptability, and the ability to invest in futures not yet fully visible across the full spectrum of ‘critical’ resources. While Western powers rush to counter China's dominance in <em>mainstream critical minerals</em>—such as rare earths, lithium, and cobalt—policy, research, and public attention tend to overlook <em>minerals at the margins</em>: materials recognized as critical and with emerging strategic importance that are already mined and refined largely within member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). These minerals, though peripheral today, have the potential to underpin the next generation of disruptive technologies. In this perspective, we outline a new resource geopolitics in which Western and OECD countries mobilize existing strengths to future-proof dependencies. The objective is not to downplay current vulnerabilities but to advance a more holistic understanding of criticality, one that looks beyond today's technological and defense imperatives. Complete decoupling is neither feasible nor desirable, and zero-sum competition offers little value in an era of planetary crisis. What is possible, however, is a rebalancing of dependencies through strategic foresight, diversification, and the cultivation of underrecognized advantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104601"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minerals at the margins and the new geopolitics of critical minerals\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Deberdt , Jessica DiCarlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The new resource geopolitics is not solely a race against China; it is a test of foresight, adaptability, and the ability to invest in futures not yet fully visible across the full spectrum of ‘critical’ resources. While Western powers rush to counter China's dominance in <em>mainstream critical minerals</em>—such as rare earths, lithium, and cobalt—policy, research, and public attention tend to overlook <em>minerals at the margins</em>: materials recognized as critical and with emerging strategic importance that are already mined and refined largely within member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). These minerals, though peripheral today, have the potential to underpin the next generation of disruptive technologies. In this perspective, we outline a new resource geopolitics in which Western and OECD countries mobilize existing strengths to future-proof dependencies. The objective is not to downplay current vulnerabilities but to advance a more holistic understanding of criticality, one that looks beyond today's technological and defense imperatives. Complete decoupling is neither feasible nor desirable, and zero-sum competition offers little value in an era of planetary crisis. What is possible, however, is a rebalancing of dependencies through strategic foresight, diversification, and the cultivation of underrecognized advantages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626000721\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626000721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minerals at the margins and the new geopolitics of critical minerals
The new resource geopolitics is not solely a race against China; it is a test of foresight, adaptability, and the ability to invest in futures not yet fully visible across the full spectrum of ‘critical’ resources. While Western powers rush to counter China's dominance in mainstream critical minerals—such as rare earths, lithium, and cobalt—policy, research, and public attention tend to overlook minerals at the margins: materials recognized as critical and with emerging strategic importance that are already mined and refined largely within member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). These minerals, though peripheral today, have the potential to underpin the next generation of disruptive technologies. In this perspective, we outline a new resource geopolitics in which Western and OECD countries mobilize existing strengths to future-proof dependencies. The objective is not to downplay current vulnerabilities but to advance a more holistic understanding of criticality, one that looks beyond today's technological and defense imperatives. Complete decoupling is neither feasible nor desirable, and zero-sum competition offers little value in an era of planetary crisis. What is possible, however, is a rebalancing of dependencies through strategic foresight, diversification, and the cultivation of underrecognized advantages.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.