经济调控能提高效率吗?机场的例子

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2026-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2025.2572516
Nicole Adler , Hans-Martin Niemeier , Shravan Kumar
{"title":"经济调控能提高效率吗?机场的例子","authors":"Nicole Adler ,&nbsp;Hans-Martin Niemeier ,&nbsp;Shravan Kumar","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2025.2572516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past 30 years, regulatory reforms have been introduced to enhance airport efficiency compared to traditional rate-of-return regulation. But have these reforms succeeded? We survey research on the impact of airport regulatory frameworks on technical, cost and allocative efficiency, addressing methodological challenges and identifying gaps for future study. We find that approaches such as total factor productivity, stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis are useful for assessing the effects of regulation, but many studies miss salient inputs and outputs, particularly in measuring capital. In second stage analyses, governance related variables, such as ownership structure, competition and regulatory design, are often overlooked. Most studies conclude that regulation improves airport efficiency, with dual-till price-caps and light-handed regulation being the more effective. However, light-handed regulation fails to reduce aeronautical charges and there is no consensus on which regulatory model achieves lower charges. Finally, allocative efficiency through peak pricing and slot trading remains unexplored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"46 2","pages":"Pages 248-269"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does economic regulation improve efficiency? The case of airports\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Adler ,&nbsp;Hans-Martin Niemeier ,&nbsp;Shravan Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01441647.2025.2572516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over the past 30 years, regulatory reforms have been introduced to enhance airport efficiency compared to traditional rate-of-return regulation. But have these reforms succeeded? We survey research on the impact of airport regulatory frameworks on technical, cost and allocative efficiency, addressing methodological challenges and identifying gaps for future study. We find that approaches such as total factor productivity, stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis are useful for assessing the effects of regulation, but many studies miss salient inputs and outputs, particularly in measuring capital. In second stage analyses, governance related variables, such as ownership structure, competition and regulatory design, are often overlooked. Most studies conclude that regulation improves airport efficiency, with dual-till price-caps and light-handed regulation being the more effective. However, light-handed regulation fails to reduce aeronautical charges and there is no consensus on which regulatory model achieves lower charges. Finally, allocative efficiency through peak pricing and slot trading remains unexplored.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Reviews\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 248-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164725000431\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164725000431","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的30年里,与传统的回报率监管相比,我们进行了监管改革,以提高机场的效率。但这些改革成功了吗?我们调查了机场监管框架对技术、成本和配置效率影响的研究,解决了方法上的挑战,并确定了未来研究的差距。我们发现,全要素生产率、随机前沿分析和数据包膜分析等方法对评估监管效果很有用,但许多研究忽略了显著的投入和产出,特别是在衡量资本方面。在第二阶段的分析中,治理相关的变量,如所有权结构、竞争和监管设计,往往被忽视。大多数研究得出的结论是,管制提高了机场效率,双重收费上限和宽松的管制更为有效。然而,宽松的监管未能降低航空收费,并且对于哪种监管模式可以降低收费没有达成共识。最后,通过峰值定价和时段交易实现的配置效率仍有待探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does economic regulation improve efficiency? The case of airports
Over the past 30 years, regulatory reforms have been introduced to enhance airport efficiency compared to traditional rate-of-return regulation. But have these reforms succeeded? We survey research on the impact of airport regulatory frameworks on technical, cost and allocative efficiency, addressing methodological challenges and identifying gaps for future study. We find that approaches such as total factor productivity, stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis are useful for assessing the effects of regulation, but many studies miss salient inputs and outputs, particularly in measuring capital. In second stage analyses, governance related variables, such as ownership structure, competition and regulatory design, are often overlooked. Most studies conclude that regulation improves airport efficiency, with dual-till price-caps and light-handed regulation being the more effective. However, light-handed regulation fails to reduce aeronautical charges and there is no consensus on which regulatory model achieves lower charges. Finally, allocative efficiency through peak pricing and slot trading remains unexplored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书