全国统一电力市场的影响:中国的模拟分析

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Energy Policy Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115222
Tielong Wu
{"title":"全国统一电力市场的影响:中国的模拟分析","authors":"Tielong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the potential effects of a unified electricity market in China, which accounts for roughly one-third of global electricity generation. We develop a theoretical framework combining the Cournot model, capturing firms' strategic behavior, with a cost-minimization benchmark. Using 2019 provincial data on thermal units, hourly electricity demand, and interprovincial transmission, we simulate five counterfactual scenarios. Results show that full national unification without transmission constraints substantially lower average electricity prices by 35.6%, reduce generation costs by 11.6%, and raise welfare by 12.1% relative to provincial autarky. By contrast, the cost-minimization model underestimates these gains, highlighting the importance of accounting for strategic behavior in assessing market outcomes. Regional coordination captures the majority of efficiency gains, while transmission bottlenecks limit price convergence and lead provincial disparities. We also find that market unification can produce counterintuitive effects on carbon emissions, as shifts between coal and gas generation may increase emissions even when total generation rises. These findings highlight the trade-offs between efficiency and environmental objectives and provide policy-relevant insights for the design of China's ongoing electricity market reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115222"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of unified national electricity markets: A simulation analysis in China\",\"authors\":\"Tielong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the potential effects of a unified electricity market in China, which accounts for roughly one-third of global electricity generation. We develop a theoretical framework combining the Cournot model, capturing firms' strategic behavior, with a cost-minimization benchmark. Using 2019 provincial data on thermal units, hourly electricity demand, and interprovincial transmission, we simulate five counterfactual scenarios. Results show that full national unification without transmission constraints substantially lower average electricity prices by 35.6%, reduce generation costs by 11.6%, and raise welfare by 12.1% relative to provincial autarky. By contrast, the cost-minimization model underestimates these gains, highlighting the importance of accounting for strategic behavior in assessing market outcomes. Regional coordination captures the majority of efficiency gains, while transmission bottlenecks limit price convergence and lead provincial disparities. We also find that market unification can produce counterintuitive effects on carbon emissions, as shifts between coal and gas generation may increase emissions even when total generation rises. These findings highlight the trade-offs between efficiency and environmental objectives and provide policy-relevant insights for the design of China's ongoing electricity market reforms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526001564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526001564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了中国统一电力市场的潜在影响,中国的发电量约占全球发电量的三分之一。我们开发了一个理论框架,结合古诺模型,捕捉企业的战略行为,与成本最小化基准。利用2019年各省的热能单位、小时电力需求和省际传输数据,我们模拟了五种反事实情景。结果表明,与省级自给自足相比,无输电约束的完全全国统一大幅降低平均电价35.6%,降低发电成本11.6%,提高福利12.1%。相比之下,成本最小化模型低估了这些收益,强调了在评估市场结果时考虑战略行为的重要性。区域协调获得了大部分效率收益,而输电瓶颈限制了价格趋同并导致各省差距。我们还发现,市场统一可能会对碳排放产生反直觉的影响,因为即使总发电量增加,煤炭和天然气发电之间的转换也可能增加排放。这些发现突出了效率和环境目标之间的权衡,并为中国正在进行的电力市场改革的设计提供了与政策相关的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of unified national electricity markets: A simulation analysis in China
This paper investigates the potential effects of a unified electricity market in China, which accounts for roughly one-third of global electricity generation. We develop a theoretical framework combining the Cournot model, capturing firms' strategic behavior, with a cost-minimization benchmark. Using 2019 provincial data on thermal units, hourly electricity demand, and interprovincial transmission, we simulate five counterfactual scenarios. Results show that full national unification without transmission constraints substantially lower average electricity prices by 35.6%, reduce generation costs by 11.6%, and raise welfare by 12.1% relative to provincial autarky. By contrast, the cost-minimization model underestimates these gains, highlighting the importance of accounting for strategic behavior in assessing market outcomes. Regional coordination captures the majority of efficiency gains, while transmission bottlenecks limit price convergence and lead provincial disparities. We also find that market unification can produce counterintuitive effects on carbon emissions, as shifts between coal and gas generation may increase emissions even when total generation rises. These findings highlight the trade-offs between efficiency and environmental objectives and provide policy-relevant insights for the design of China's ongoing electricity market reforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书