{"title":"全国统一电力市场的影响:中国的模拟分析","authors":"Tielong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the potential effects of a unified electricity market in China, which accounts for roughly one-third of global electricity generation. We develop a theoretical framework combining the Cournot model, capturing firms' strategic behavior, with a cost-minimization benchmark. Using 2019 provincial data on thermal units, hourly electricity demand, and interprovincial transmission, we simulate five counterfactual scenarios. Results show that full national unification without transmission constraints substantially lower average electricity prices by 35.6%, reduce generation costs by 11.6%, and raise welfare by 12.1% relative to provincial autarky. By contrast, the cost-minimization model underestimates these gains, highlighting the importance of accounting for strategic behavior in assessing market outcomes. Regional coordination captures the majority of efficiency gains, while transmission bottlenecks limit price convergence and lead provincial disparities. We also find that market unification can produce counterintuitive effects on carbon emissions, as shifts between coal and gas generation may increase emissions even when total generation rises. These findings highlight the trade-offs between efficiency and environmental objectives and provide policy-relevant insights for the design of China's ongoing electricity market reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115222"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of unified national electricity markets: A simulation analysis in China\",\"authors\":\"Tielong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the potential effects of a unified electricity market in China, which accounts for roughly one-third of global electricity generation. We develop a theoretical framework combining the Cournot model, capturing firms' strategic behavior, with a cost-minimization benchmark. Using 2019 provincial data on thermal units, hourly electricity demand, and interprovincial transmission, we simulate five counterfactual scenarios. Results show that full national unification without transmission constraints substantially lower average electricity prices by 35.6%, reduce generation costs by 11.6%, and raise welfare by 12.1% relative to provincial autarky. By contrast, the cost-minimization model underestimates these gains, highlighting the importance of accounting for strategic behavior in assessing market outcomes. Regional coordination captures the majority of efficiency gains, while transmission bottlenecks limit price convergence and lead provincial disparities. We also find that market unification can produce counterintuitive effects on carbon emissions, as shifts between coal and gas generation may increase emissions even when total generation rises. These findings highlight the trade-offs between efficiency and environmental objectives and provide policy-relevant insights for the design of China's ongoing electricity market reforms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526001564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526001564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of unified national electricity markets: A simulation analysis in China
This paper investigates the potential effects of a unified electricity market in China, which accounts for roughly one-third of global electricity generation. We develop a theoretical framework combining the Cournot model, capturing firms' strategic behavior, with a cost-minimization benchmark. Using 2019 provincial data on thermal units, hourly electricity demand, and interprovincial transmission, we simulate five counterfactual scenarios. Results show that full national unification without transmission constraints substantially lower average electricity prices by 35.6%, reduce generation costs by 11.6%, and raise welfare by 12.1% relative to provincial autarky. By contrast, the cost-minimization model underestimates these gains, highlighting the importance of accounting for strategic behavior in assessing market outcomes. Regional coordination captures the majority of efficiency gains, while transmission bottlenecks limit price convergence and lead provincial disparities. We also find that market unification can produce counterintuitive effects on carbon emissions, as shifts between coal and gas generation may increase emissions even when total generation rises. These findings highlight the trade-offs between efficiency and environmental objectives and provide policy-relevant insights for the design of China's ongoing electricity market reforms.
期刊介绍:
Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques.
Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.