Beatriz Morgado Marcoje , Laura Schiavon , Michelle Hallack , Danielle Carusi Machado , Mariana Weiss de Abreu
{"title":"巴西社会电价计划的影响评估:来自回归不连续设计的证据","authors":"Beatriz Morgado Marcoje , Laura Schiavon , Michelle Hallack , Danielle Carusi Machado , Mariana Weiss de Abreu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper evaluates Brazil's Social Electricity Tariff Program and its ability to improve electricity affordability for low-income households using a sharp Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Using data from the 2017–2018 Family Budget Survey (IBGE, 2018), we compare households just below and just above the income eligibility cutoff to estimate the causal effect of eligibility on electricity consumption and expenditures. We find that eligible households consume on average 20 kWh less electricity per month than households just above the cutoff, consistent with under-consumption near the threshold. Eligibility also reduces monthly electricity spending by R$15.35 on average. While statistically significant, this level of relief appears too small to meaningfully ease budget constraints, potentially encouraging households to restrict electricity use to remain within more subsidized consumption brackets. The results suggest that the current benefit schedule may be insufficient to ensure adequate access to modern energy services—such as thermal comfort and information and entertainment—while maintaining payment affordability. We discuss policy adjustments to better align subsidy levels and target heterogeneous household needs, and highlight the importance of accounting for regional and seasonal variation in electricity demand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115143"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact evaluation of the social electricity tariff program in Brazil: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Morgado Marcoje , Laura Schiavon , Michelle Hallack , Danielle Carusi Machado , Mariana Weiss de Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper evaluates Brazil's Social Electricity Tariff Program and its ability to improve electricity affordability for low-income households using a sharp Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Using data from the 2017–2018 Family Budget Survey (IBGE, 2018), we compare households just below and just above the income eligibility cutoff to estimate the causal effect of eligibility on electricity consumption and expenditures. We find that eligible households consume on average 20 kWh less electricity per month than households just above the cutoff, consistent with under-consumption near the threshold. Eligibility also reduces monthly electricity spending by R$15.35 on average. While statistically significant, this level of relief appears too small to meaningfully ease budget constraints, potentially encouraging households to restrict electricity use to remain within more subsidized consumption brackets. The results suggest that the current benefit schedule may be insufficient to ensure adequate access to modern energy services—such as thermal comfort and information and entertainment—while maintaining payment affordability. We discuss policy adjustments to better align subsidy levels and target heterogeneous household needs, and highlight the importance of accounting for regional and seasonal variation in electricity demand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526000777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526000777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact evaluation of the social electricity tariff program in Brazil: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design
This paper evaluates Brazil's Social Electricity Tariff Program and its ability to improve electricity affordability for low-income households using a sharp Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Using data from the 2017–2018 Family Budget Survey (IBGE, 2018), we compare households just below and just above the income eligibility cutoff to estimate the causal effect of eligibility on electricity consumption and expenditures. We find that eligible households consume on average 20 kWh less electricity per month than households just above the cutoff, consistent with under-consumption near the threshold. Eligibility also reduces monthly electricity spending by R$15.35 on average. While statistically significant, this level of relief appears too small to meaningfully ease budget constraints, potentially encouraging households to restrict electricity use to remain within more subsidized consumption brackets. The results suggest that the current benefit schedule may be insufficient to ensure adequate access to modern energy services—such as thermal comfort and information and entertainment—while maintaining payment affordability. We discuss policy adjustments to better align subsidy levels and target heterogeneous household needs, and highlight the importance of accounting for regional and seasonal variation in electricity demand.
期刊介绍:
Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques.
Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.