巴西社会电价计划的影响评估:来自回归不连续设计的证据

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Energy Policy Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115143
Beatriz Morgado Marcoje , Laura Schiavon , Michelle Hallack , Danielle Carusi Machado , Mariana Weiss de Abreu
{"title":"巴西社会电价计划的影响评估:来自回归不连续设计的证据","authors":"Beatriz Morgado Marcoje ,&nbsp;Laura Schiavon ,&nbsp;Michelle Hallack ,&nbsp;Danielle Carusi Machado ,&nbsp;Mariana Weiss de Abreu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper evaluates Brazil's Social Electricity Tariff Program and its ability to improve electricity affordability for low-income households using a sharp Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Using data from the 2017–2018 Family Budget Survey (IBGE, 2018), we compare households just below and just above the income eligibility cutoff to estimate the causal effect of eligibility on electricity consumption and expenditures. We find that eligible households consume on average 20 kWh less electricity per month than households just above the cutoff, consistent with under-consumption near the threshold. Eligibility also reduces monthly electricity spending by R$15.35 on average. While statistically significant, this level of relief appears too small to meaningfully ease budget constraints, potentially encouraging households to restrict electricity use to remain within more subsidized consumption brackets. The results suggest that the current benefit schedule may be insufficient to ensure adequate access to modern energy services—such as thermal comfort and information and entertainment—while maintaining payment affordability. We discuss policy adjustments to better align subsidy levels and target heterogeneous household needs, and highlight the importance of accounting for regional and seasonal variation in electricity demand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115143"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact evaluation of the social electricity tariff program in Brazil: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Morgado Marcoje ,&nbsp;Laura Schiavon ,&nbsp;Michelle Hallack ,&nbsp;Danielle Carusi Machado ,&nbsp;Mariana Weiss de Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper evaluates Brazil's Social Electricity Tariff Program and its ability to improve electricity affordability for low-income households using a sharp Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Using data from the 2017–2018 Family Budget Survey (IBGE, 2018), we compare households just below and just above the income eligibility cutoff to estimate the causal effect of eligibility on electricity consumption and expenditures. We find that eligible households consume on average 20 kWh less electricity per month than households just above the cutoff, consistent with under-consumption near the threshold. Eligibility also reduces monthly electricity spending by R$15.35 on average. While statistically significant, this level of relief appears too small to meaningfully ease budget constraints, potentially encouraging households to restrict electricity use to remain within more subsidized consumption brackets. The results suggest that the current benefit schedule may be insufficient to ensure adequate access to modern energy services—such as thermal comfort and information and entertainment—while maintaining payment affordability. We discuss policy adjustments to better align subsidy levels and target heterogeneous household needs, and highlight the importance of accounting for regional and seasonal variation in electricity demand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526000777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526000777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用急剧回归不连续设计(RDD)评估了巴西的社会电价计划及其提高低收入家庭电力负担能力的能力。使用2017-2018年家庭预算调查(IBGE, 2018)的数据,我们比较了收入资格门槛略低于和略高于收入资格门槛的家庭,以估计资格对电力消费和支出的因果影响。我们发现,符合条件的家庭每月平均耗电量比刚好在临界值以上的家庭少20千瓦时,这与接近临界值的耗电量不足一致。获得资格还可以平均每月减少15.35雷亚尔的电费支出。虽然在统计上意义重大,但这种程度的缓解似乎太小,无法有效缓解预算紧张,可能会鼓励家庭限制用电量,以保持在更多补贴的消费范围内。结果表明,目前的福利计划可能不足以确保充分获得现代能源服务,如热舒适、信息和娱乐,同时保持支付能力。我们讨论了政策调整,以更好地调整补贴水平和针对不同的家庭需求,并强调了考虑电力需求的区域和季节变化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact evaluation of the social electricity tariff program in Brazil: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design
This paper evaluates Brazil's Social Electricity Tariff Program and its ability to improve electricity affordability for low-income households using a sharp Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Using data from the 2017–2018 Family Budget Survey (IBGE, 2018), we compare households just below and just above the income eligibility cutoff to estimate the causal effect of eligibility on electricity consumption and expenditures. We find that eligible households consume on average 20 kWh less electricity per month than households just above the cutoff, consistent with under-consumption near the threshold. Eligibility also reduces monthly electricity spending by R$15.35 on average. While statistically significant, this level of relief appears too small to meaningfully ease budget constraints, potentially encouraging households to restrict electricity use to remain within more subsidized consumption brackets. The results suggest that the current benefit schedule may be insufficient to ensure adequate access to modern energy services—such as thermal comfort and information and entertainment—while maintaining payment affordability. We discuss policy adjustments to better align subsidy levels and target heterogeneous household needs, and highlight the importance of accounting for regional and seasonal variation in electricity demand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书