{"title":"测量机器陪伴体验:AI陪伴的量表开发与验证","authors":"Jaime Banks","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2026.108945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mainstreaming of companionable machines—customizable artificial agents designed to participate in ongoing, idiosyncratic, socioemotional relationships—is met with relative theoretical and empirical disarray, according to recent systematic reviews. In particular, the conceptualization and measurement of machine companionship (MC) is inconsistent or sometimes altogether missing. This study starts to bridge that gap by developing and initially validating a novel measurement to capture MC experiences—the unfolding, autotelic, positively experienced, coordinated connection between human and machine—with AI companions (AICs). After systematic generation and expert review of an item pool (including items pertaining to dyadism, coordination, autotelicity, temporality, and positive valence), <em>N</em> = 467 people interacting AICs responded to the item pool and to construct validation measures. Through exploratory factor analysis, two factors were induced: Eudaimonic Exchange and Connective Coordination. Construct validation analyses indicate the factors function largely as expected (and confirmed in a second sample; <em>N</em> = 249). <em>Post-hoc</em> analyses of deviations suggests two different templates for MC with AICs: One socioinstrumental and one autotelic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 108945"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring machine companionship experiences: Scale development and validation for AI companions\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2026.108945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The mainstreaming of companionable machines—customizable artificial agents designed to participate in ongoing, idiosyncratic, socioemotional relationships—is met with relative theoretical and empirical disarray, according to recent systematic reviews. In particular, the conceptualization and measurement of machine companionship (MC) is inconsistent or sometimes altogether missing. This study starts to bridge that gap by developing and initially validating a novel measurement to capture MC experiences—the unfolding, autotelic, positively experienced, coordinated connection between human and machine—with AI companions (AICs). After systematic generation and expert review of an item pool (including items pertaining to dyadism, coordination, autotelicity, temporality, and positive valence), <em>N</em> = 467 people interacting AICs responded to the item pool and to construct validation measures. Through exploratory factor analysis, two factors were induced: Eudaimonic Exchange and Connective Coordination. Construct validation analyses indicate the factors function largely as expected (and confirmed in a second sample; <em>N</em> = 249). <em>Post-hoc</em> analyses of deviations suggests two different templates for MC with AICs: One socioinstrumental and one autotelic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563226000427\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563226000427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring machine companionship experiences: Scale development and validation for AI companions
The mainstreaming of companionable machines—customizable artificial agents designed to participate in ongoing, idiosyncratic, socioemotional relationships—is met with relative theoretical and empirical disarray, according to recent systematic reviews. In particular, the conceptualization and measurement of machine companionship (MC) is inconsistent or sometimes altogether missing. This study starts to bridge that gap by developing and initially validating a novel measurement to capture MC experiences—the unfolding, autotelic, positively experienced, coordinated connection between human and machine—with AI companions (AICs). After systematic generation and expert review of an item pool (including items pertaining to dyadism, coordination, autotelicity, temporality, and positive valence), N = 467 people interacting AICs responded to the item pool and to construct validation measures. Through exploratory factor analysis, two factors were induced: Eudaimonic Exchange and Connective Coordination. Construct validation analyses indicate the factors function largely as expected (and confirmed in a second sample; N = 249). Post-hoc analyses of deviations suggests two different templates for MC with AICs: One socioinstrumental and one autotelic.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.