测量机器陪伴体验:AI陪伴的量表开发与验证

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2026.108945
Jaime Banks
{"title":"测量机器陪伴体验:AI陪伴的量表开发与验证","authors":"Jaime Banks","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2026.108945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mainstreaming of companionable machines—customizable artificial agents designed to participate in ongoing, idiosyncratic, socioemotional relationships—is met with relative theoretical and empirical disarray, according to recent systematic reviews. In particular, the conceptualization and measurement of machine companionship (MC) is inconsistent or sometimes altogether missing. This study starts to bridge that gap by developing and initially validating a novel measurement to capture MC experiences—the unfolding, autotelic, positively experienced, coordinated connection between human and machine—with AI companions (AICs). After systematic generation and expert review of an item pool (including items pertaining to dyadism, coordination, autotelicity, temporality, and positive valence), <em>N</em> = 467 people interacting AICs responded to the item pool and to construct validation measures. Through exploratory factor analysis, two factors were induced: Eudaimonic Exchange and Connective Coordination. Construct validation analyses indicate the factors function largely as expected (and confirmed in a second sample; <em>N</em> = 249). <em>Post-hoc</em> analyses of deviations suggests two different templates for MC with AICs: One socioinstrumental and one autotelic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 108945"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring machine companionship experiences: Scale development and validation for AI companions\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2026.108945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The mainstreaming of companionable machines—customizable artificial agents designed to participate in ongoing, idiosyncratic, socioemotional relationships—is met with relative theoretical and empirical disarray, according to recent systematic reviews. In particular, the conceptualization and measurement of machine companionship (MC) is inconsistent or sometimes altogether missing. This study starts to bridge that gap by developing and initially validating a novel measurement to capture MC experiences—the unfolding, autotelic, positively experienced, coordinated connection between human and machine—with AI companions (AICs). After systematic generation and expert review of an item pool (including items pertaining to dyadism, coordination, autotelicity, temporality, and positive valence), <em>N</em> = 467 people interacting AICs responded to the item pool and to construct validation measures. Through exploratory factor analysis, two factors were induced: Eudaimonic Exchange and Connective Coordination. Construct validation analyses indicate the factors function largely as expected (and confirmed in a second sample; <em>N</em> = 249). <em>Post-hoc</em> analyses of deviations suggests two different templates for MC with AICs: One socioinstrumental and one autotelic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563226000427\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563226000427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据最近的系统综述,可陪伴机器(可定制的人工代理,用于参与持续的、特殊的、社会情感关系)的主流化遇到了相对的理论和经验混乱。特别是,机器陪伴(MC)的概念和测量是不一致的,有时完全缺失。本研究通过开发和初步验证一种新的测量方法来捕捉MC体验,即人类和机器与AI同伴(aic)之间展开的、自成一体的、积极体验的、协调的联系,从而开始弥合这一差距。经过系统生成和专家评审的题库(包括与亲和性、协调性、自动机性、时间性和正效性有关的题库),N = 467人对题库进行了响应,并构建了验证措施。通过探索性因子分析,诱导出两个因子:幸福感交换因子和连接协调因子。结构验证分析表明,这些因素在很大程度上符合预期(并在第二个样本中得到证实;N = 249)。对偏差的事后分析表明,患有aic的MC有两种不同的模板:一种是社会工具型的,一种是自动机型的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring machine companionship experiences: Scale development and validation for AI companions
The mainstreaming of companionable machines—customizable artificial agents designed to participate in ongoing, idiosyncratic, socioemotional relationships—is met with relative theoretical and empirical disarray, according to recent systematic reviews. In particular, the conceptualization and measurement of machine companionship (MC) is inconsistent or sometimes altogether missing. This study starts to bridge that gap by developing and initially validating a novel measurement to capture MC experiences—the unfolding, autotelic, positively experienced, coordinated connection between human and machine—with AI companions (AICs). After systematic generation and expert review of an item pool (including items pertaining to dyadism, coordination, autotelicity, temporality, and positive valence), N = 467 people interacting AICs responded to the item pool and to construct validation measures. Through exploratory factor analysis, two factors were induced: Eudaimonic Exchange and Connective Coordination. Construct validation analyses indicate the factors function largely as expected (and confirmed in a second sample; N = 249). Post-hoc analyses of deviations suggests two different templates for MC with AICs: One socioinstrumental and one autotelic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书