言语和运动偏侧性重新评估:在线言语视觉半视野任务的功能性经颅多普勒随访。

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Laterality Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2026.2636585
Jack Harry Grant, John M Hudson, Jessica C Hodgson
{"title":"言语和运动偏侧性重新评估:在线言语视觉半视野任务的功能性经颅多普勒随访。","authors":"Jack Harry Grant, John M Hudson, Jessica C Hodgson","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2026.2636585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable measures of language laterality are essential for understanding relationships between speech and other lateralized functions. In a previous study (Grant et al., 2023. Testing the relationship between lateralization on sequence-based motor tasks and language laterality using an online battery. <i>Laterality</i>, 28(1), 1-31), an online verbal visual half-field (vVHF) task assessed speech production laterality but showed limited reliability and validity. The present study conducted novel analyses linking this measure with functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (fTCD) data collected from the same sample as part of a separate project (Parker et al., 2022. Inconsistent language lateralisation: Testing the dissociable language laterality hypothesis using behaviour and lateralised cerebral blood flow. <i>Cortex</i>, 154, 105-134). In total, 187 participants completed both the online battery and an in-person fTCD sentence-generation task. Results confirmed robust left lateralization for speech production across handedness groups. However, laterality indices from the vVHF task did not correlate with the fTCD measure, reinforcing concerns about the validity of the online paradigm. Replicating previous findings, no significant association was observed between categorical measures of speech and motor laterality. Exploratory analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between motor laterality indices and fTCD speech laterality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":" ","pages":"390-407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech and motor laterality reassessed: a functional transcranial Doppler follow-up to the online verbal visual half-field task.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Harry Grant, John M Hudson, Jessica C Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1357650X.2026.2636585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reliable measures of language laterality are essential for understanding relationships between speech and other lateralized functions. In a previous study (Grant et al., 2023. Testing the relationship between lateralization on sequence-based motor tasks and language laterality using an online battery. <i>Laterality</i>, 28(1), 1-31), an online verbal visual half-field (vVHF) task assessed speech production laterality but showed limited reliability and validity. The present study conducted novel analyses linking this measure with functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (fTCD) data collected from the same sample as part of a separate project (Parker et al., 2022. Inconsistent language lateralisation: Testing the dissociable language laterality hypothesis using behaviour and lateralised cerebral blood flow. <i>Cortex</i>, 154, 105-134). In total, 187 participants completed both the online battery and an in-person fTCD sentence-generation task. Results confirmed robust left lateralization for speech production across handedness groups. However, laterality indices from the vVHF task did not correlate with the fTCD measure, reinforcing concerns about the validity of the online paradigm. Replicating previous findings, no significant association was observed between categorical measures of speech and motor laterality. Exploratory analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between motor laterality indices and fTCD speech laterality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laterality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"390-407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laterality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2026.2636585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2026.2636585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言侧性的可靠测量对于理解言语和其他侧性功能之间的关系至关重要。在之前的一项研究中(Grant et al., 2023)。使用在线电池测试基于顺序的运动任务的偏侧性与语言偏侧性的关系。横向性,28(1),1-31),一个在线言语视觉半场(vVHF)任务评估了言语产生的横向性,但显示有限的信度和效度。本研究进行了新的分析,将这一措施与从同一样本收集的功能性经颅多普勒超声(fTCD)数据联系起来,作为单独项目的一部分(Parker et al., 2022)。不一致的语言侧化:用行为和侧脑血流量测试可分离的语言侧化假说。中国生物医学工程学报,2004,11(5):559 - 564。总共有187名参与者完成了在线电池和面对面的fTCD句子生成任务。结果证实,在利手性群体中,语言产生的左偏侧性很强。然而,来自vVHF任务的偏侧性指数与fTCD测量并不相关,这加强了对在线范式有效性的关注。重复先前的发现,言语和运动侧性的分类测量之间没有明显的关联。探索性分析显示运动侧度指数与fTCD言语侧度呈显著正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speech and motor laterality reassessed: a functional transcranial Doppler follow-up to the online verbal visual half-field task.

Reliable measures of language laterality are essential for understanding relationships between speech and other lateralized functions. In a previous study (Grant et al., 2023. Testing the relationship between lateralization on sequence-based motor tasks and language laterality using an online battery. Laterality, 28(1), 1-31), an online verbal visual half-field (vVHF) task assessed speech production laterality but showed limited reliability and validity. The present study conducted novel analyses linking this measure with functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (fTCD) data collected from the same sample as part of a separate project (Parker et al., 2022. Inconsistent language lateralisation: Testing the dissociable language laterality hypothesis using behaviour and lateralised cerebral blood flow. Cortex, 154, 105-134). In total, 187 participants completed both the online battery and an in-person fTCD sentence-generation task. Results confirmed robust left lateralization for speech production across handedness groups. However, laterality indices from the vVHF task did not correlate with the fTCD measure, reinforcing concerns about the validity of the online paradigm. Replicating previous findings, no significant association was observed between categorical measures of speech and motor laterality. Exploratory analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between motor laterality indices and fTCD speech laterality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书