Stijn Bogaert, Hannah Lukasik, Panagiotis Georgiou, Philipp Gude, Sonja Farajzadeh, Stefan Dazert, Olaf Michel, Konstantin van Ackeren, Stefan Volkenstein
{"title":"幼儿中隐藏的SARS-CoV-2组粒感染:常规测试不能告诉什么。","authors":"Stijn Bogaert, Hannah Lukasik, Panagiotis Georgiou, Philipp Gude, Sonja Farajzadeh, Stefan Dazert, Olaf Michel, Konstantin van Ackeren, Stefan Volkenstein","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a global emergency. Screening protocols vary regarding the epidemiological situation and the dominant virus variant. Implementing these protocols can be particularly challenging in young children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in small children. Furthermore, hidden severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron infections, missed by routine PCR testing, were intraoperatively analyzed, and multiple testing methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present prospective cohort study was performed between March and May 2022. All children aged ≤ 6 years who were admitted for adenoidectomy and/or tonsillotomy to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery of the Saint Elisabeth Hospital, in Bochum, Germany, were included. Routine PCR swabs were performed ≤ 24 hours before surgery. Intraoperatively, rapid antigen tests, separate naso- and oropharyngeal PCR swabs, adenoid and/or tonsillar tissue for PCR analysis, and serological tests were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 55 children with negative preoperative PCR tests. Intraoperatively, SARS-CoV-2 particles were detected in 51% of the sample. Among children without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days before surgery, the prevalence was 43%. Compared with the PCR results regarding tissue, the preoperative PCR screening had a sensitivity of 20%, and, in the intraoperative PCR screening, the optimally performed swabs had a sensitivity of 79%. In total, 29% of the positive cases had a cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30. Nasopharyngeal PCR tests detected significantly more SARS-CoV-2 infections than oropharyngeal swabs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine PCR tests in infants may present a high rate of false-negative results and a low sensitivity. These findings question preoperative screening protocols that include testing asymptomatic children who have recovered from a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell.\",\"authors\":\"Stijn Bogaert, Hannah Lukasik, Panagiotis Georgiou, Philipp Gude, Sonja Farajzadeh, Stefan Dazert, Olaf Michel, Konstantin van Ackeren, Stefan Volkenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1809649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a global emergency. Screening protocols vary regarding the epidemiological situation and the dominant virus variant. Implementing these protocols can be particularly challenging in young children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in small children. Furthermore, hidden severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron infections, missed by routine PCR testing, were intraoperatively analyzed, and multiple testing methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present prospective cohort study was performed between March and May 2022. All children aged ≤ 6 years who were admitted for adenoidectomy and/or tonsillotomy to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery of the Saint Elisabeth Hospital, in Bochum, Germany, were included. Routine PCR swabs were performed ≤ 24 hours before surgery. Intraoperatively, rapid antigen tests, separate naso- and oropharyngeal PCR swabs, adenoid and/or tonsillar tissue for PCR analysis, and serological tests were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 55 children with negative preoperative PCR tests. Intraoperatively, SARS-CoV-2 particles were detected in 51% of the sample. Among children without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days before surgery, the prevalence was 43%. Compared with the PCR results regarding tissue, the preoperative PCR screening had a sensitivity of 20%, and, in the intraoperative PCR screening, the optimally performed swabs had a sensitivity of 79%. In total, 29% of the positive cases had a cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30. Nasopharyngeal PCR tests detected significantly more SARS-CoV-2 infections than oropharyngeal swabs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine PCR tests in infants may present a high rate of false-negative results and a low sensitivity. These findings question preoperative screening protocols that include testing asymptomatic children who have recovered from a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell.
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a global emergency. Screening protocols vary regarding the epidemiological situation and the dominant virus variant. Implementing these protocols can be particularly challenging in young children.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in small children. Furthermore, hidden severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron infections, missed by routine PCR testing, were intraoperatively analyzed, and multiple testing methods were compared.
Methods: The present prospective cohort study was performed between March and May 2022. All children aged ≤ 6 years who were admitted for adenoidectomy and/or tonsillotomy to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery of the Saint Elisabeth Hospital, in Bochum, Germany, were included. Routine PCR swabs were performed ≤ 24 hours before surgery. Intraoperatively, rapid antigen tests, separate naso- and oropharyngeal PCR swabs, adenoid and/or tonsillar tissue for PCR analysis, and serological tests were collected.
Results: We included 55 children with negative preoperative PCR tests. Intraoperatively, SARS-CoV-2 particles were detected in 51% of the sample. Among children without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days before surgery, the prevalence was 43%. Compared with the PCR results regarding tissue, the preoperative PCR screening had a sensitivity of 20%, and, in the intraoperative PCR screening, the optimally performed swabs had a sensitivity of 79%. In total, 29% of the positive cases had a cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30. Nasopharyngeal PCR tests detected significantly more SARS-CoV-2 infections than oropharyngeal swabs.
Conclusion: Routine PCR tests in infants may present a high rate of false-negative results and a low sensitivity. These findings question preoperative screening protocols that include testing asymptomatic children who have recovered from a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.