全球监测背景下的生态系统范围制图。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2026-03-15 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129054
Polina Tregubova, Bruno Smets, Lars Hein, Ioannis P Kokkoris, Michela Perrone, Vojtěch Barták, Jan Komárek, Vítězslav Moudrý, Ruben Remelgado, Stefano Balbi, Alessio Bulckaen, Ian McCallum, Myroslava Lesiv, Marc Paganini, Carsten Meyer
{"title":"全球监测背景下的生态系统范围制图。","authors":"Polina Tregubova, Bruno Smets, Lars Hein, Ioannis P Kokkoris, Michela Perrone, Vojtěch Barták, Jan Komárek, Vítězslav Moudrý, Ruben Remelgado, Stefano Balbi, Alessio Bulckaen, Ian McCallum, Myroslava Lesiv, Marc Paganini, Carsten Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The vital role of ecosystems in maintaining biosphere stability is now recognized globally. Updates in policy frameworks on biodiversity and environmental decline include information on ecosystem extent (EE) as a core assessment indicator, e.g., the Global Biodiversity Framework indicator A2 'Extent of natural ecosystems'. The recently proposed System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting requires EE as the first pillar for assessing ecosystem condition and, ultimately, ecosystem services. Detailed and up-to-date information on ecosystem characteristics is increasingly achievable due to the unprecedented availability of Earth observation data, combined with advances in geospatial data analysis and high-performance computing, building on a long-established tradition of surface monitoring. However, consistent mapping and delineation of EE remains a challenge. This research aims to identify the role of EE mapping data in nature protection, environmental degradation, and climate agendas, and define components of the usability of geospatial data products as operational solutions. For that, we analyzed global and regional policy frameworks and corporate reporting standards to determine EE-related data needs, alongside bottlenecks shaped by domain-specific challenges, such as thematic complexity of ecosystem definitions, high costs of in-situ monitoring, and demands of data processing workflows to capture dynamic and complex entities. Finally, we translated these findings into a checklist to design policy- and reporting-ready products, covering relevance, thematic coherence, reliability of mapping outputs defined by validation and uncertainty quantification, and transparency of data and methods contributing to the achievement of shared policy targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"402 ","pages":"129054"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem extent mapping in a global monitoring context.\",\"authors\":\"Polina Tregubova, Bruno Smets, Lars Hein, Ioannis P Kokkoris, Michela Perrone, Vojtěch Barták, Jan Komárek, Vítězslav Moudrý, Ruben Remelgado, Stefano Balbi, Alessio Bulckaen, Ian McCallum, Myroslava Lesiv, Marc Paganini, Carsten Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The vital role of ecosystems in maintaining biosphere stability is now recognized globally. Updates in policy frameworks on biodiversity and environmental decline include information on ecosystem extent (EE) as a core assessment indicator, e.g., the Global Biodiversity Framework indicator A2 'Extent of natural ecosystems'. The recently proposed System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting requires EE as the first pillar for assessing ecosystem condition and, ultimately, ecosystem services. Detailed and up-to-date information on ecosystem characteristics is increasingly achievable due to the unprecedented availability of Earth observation data, combined with advances in geospatial data analysis and high-performance computing, building on a long-established tradition of surface monitoring. However, consistent mapping and delineation of EE remains a challenge. This research aims to identify the role of EE mapping data in nature protection, environmental degradation, and climate agendas, and define components of the usability of geospatial data products as operational solutions. For that, we analyzed global and regional policy frameworks and corporate reporting standards to determine EE-related data needs, alongside bottlenecks shaped by domain-specific challenges, such as thematic complexity of ecosystem definitions, high costs of in-situ monitoring, and demands of data processing workflows to capture dynamic and complex entities. Finally, we translated these findings into a checklist to design policy- and reporting-ready products, covering relevance, thematic coherence, reliability of mapping outputs defined by validation and uncertainty quantification, and transparency of data and methods contributing to the achievement of shared policy targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"402 \",\"pages\":\"129054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统在维持生物圈稳定方面的重要作用现已在全球得到承认。关于生物多样性和环境退化的政策框架的更新包括将生态系统范围(EE)作为核心评估指标的信息,例如全球生物多样性框架指标A2“自然生态系统范围”。最近提出的环境经济核算系统-生态系统核算要求EE作为评估生态系统状况并最终评估生态系统服务的第一支柱。由于地球观测数据的空前可用性,再加上地理空间数据分析和高性能计算的进步,在长期建立的地面监测传统的基础上,越来越多地可以获得关于生态系统特征的详细和最新信息。然而,一致的情感表达映射和描述仍然是一个挑战。本研究旨在确定EE制图数据在自然保护、环境退化和气候议程中的作用,并定义地理空间数据产品可用性的组成部分作为操作解决方案。为此,我们分析了全球和区域政策框架和企业报告标准,以确定与电子电气相关的数据需求,以及由领域特定挑战形成的瓶颈,例如生态系统定义的主题复杂性、原位监测的高成本以及捕获动态和复杂实体的数据处理工作流程的需求。最后,我们将这些发现转化为一份清单,用于设计政策和报告准备产品,包括相关性、主题一致性、通过验证和不确定性量化定义的映射输出的可靠性,以及有助于实现共同政策目标的数据和方法的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecosystem extent mapping in a global monitoring context.

The vital role of ecosystems in maintaining biosphere stability is now recognized globally. Updates in policy frameworks on biodiversity and environmental decline include information on ecosystem extent (EE) as a core assessment indicator, e.g., the Global Biodiversity Framework indicator A2 'Extent of natural ecosystems'. The recently proposed System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting requires EE as the first pillar for assessing ecosystem condition and, ultimately, ecosystem services. Detailed and up-to-date information on ecosystem characteristics is increasingly achievable due to the unprecedented availability of Earth observation data, combined with advances in geospatial data analysis and high-performance computing, building on a long-established tradition of surface monitoring. However, consistent mapping and delineation of EE remains a challenge. This research aims to identify the role of EE mapping data in nature protection, environmental degradation, and climate agendas, and define components of the usability of geospatial data products as operational solutions. For that, we analyzed global and regional policy frameworks and corporate reporting standards to determine EE-related data needs, alongside bottlenecks shaped by domain-specific challenges, such as thematic complexity of ecosystem definitions, high costs of in-situ monitoring, and demands of data processing workflows to capture dynamic and complex entities. Finally, we translated these findings into a checklist to design policy- and reporting-ready products, covering relevance, thematic coherence, reliability of mapping outputs defined by validation and uncertainty quantification, and transparency of data and methods contributing to the achievement of shared policy targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书