坦桑尼亚西北部中学多成分月经、性和生殖健康干预的可接受性、成本和吸收:来自PASS MHW试点研究的经验教训。

IF 3 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Evaluation Review Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-28 DOI:10.1177/0193841X261422289
Elialilia S Okello, Yovitha Sedekia, Dunstan J Matungwa, Belen Torondel, Giulia Greco, Jennifer Rubli, Philip Ayieko, Onike Mcharo, John Luwayi, Brooke Hunsaker, Ramadhan Hashim, Sia Towo, Fauzia Nahay, Saidi Kapiga, Jenny Renju
{"title":"坦桑尼亚西北部中学多成分月经、性和生殖健康干预的可接受性、成本和吸收:来自PASS MHW试点研究的经验教训。","authors":"Elialilia S Okello, Yovitha Sedekia, Dunstan J Matungwa, Belen Torondel, Giulia Greco, Jennifer Rubli, Philip Ayieko, Onike Mcharo, John Luwayi, Brooke Hunsaker, Ramadhan Hashim, Sia Towo, Fauzia Nahay, Saidi Kapiga, Jenny Renju","doi":"10.1177/0193841X261422289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative menstruation experiences adversely affect schoolgirls' social participation, education, and overall health, yet comprehensive menstrual health interventions are limited in Tanzanian schools. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, cost, and potential impact mechanisms of a comprehensive school-based menstrual, sexual, and reproductive health (MSRH) intervention. The intervention, piloted in four secondary schools, included education sessions for girls and boys, pain management, distribution of menstrual kits (reusable pads and menstrual cups), WASH improvements, and stakeholder engagement. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed acceptability, fidelity, cost, context, and potential impact mechanisms using qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and WASH observations) and quantitative methods (survey questionnaires, structured observation of education sessions, costing, and monitoring data). The intervention was well received by students, teachers, and local government authorities; MSRH education reached 86% of schoolgirls and 72% of schoolboys, while over 93% of girls received menstrual kits. Total implementation cost across the four schools was 111,347,467 TZS (38,003 GBP), approximately 39.05 GBP per student, lower than comparable initiatives in East Africa. Findings indicate the intervention is feasible and acceptable in school settings and can inform future menstrual health and hygiene programs, though further research is needed to assess broader effectiveness and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47533,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Review","volume":" ","pages":"771-801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability, Cost, and Uptake of a Multicomponent Menstrual, Sexual, and Reproductive Health Intervention in Secondary Schools in Northwest Tanzania: Lessons From the PASS MHW Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elialilia S Okello, Yovitha Sedekia, Dunstan J Matungwa, Belen Torondel, Giulia Greco, Jennifer Rubli, Philip Ayieko, Onike Mcharo, John Luwayi, Brooke Hunsaker, Ramadhan Hashim, Sia Towo, Fauzia Nahay, Saidi Kapiga, Jenny Renju\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0193841X261422289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Negative menstruation experiences adversely affect schoolgirls' social participation, education, and overall health, yet comprehensive menstrual health interventions are limited in Tanzanian schools. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, cost, and potential impact mechanisms of a comprehensive school-based menstrual, sexual, and reproductive health (MSRH) intervention. The intervention, piloted in four secondary schools, included education sessions for girls and boys, pain management, distribution of menstrual kits (reusable pads and menstrual cups), WASH improvements, and stakeholder engagement. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed acceptability, fidelity, cost, context, and potential impact mechanisms using qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and WASH observations) and quantitative methods (survey questionnaires, structured observation of education sessions, costing, and monitoring data). The intervention was well received by students, teachers, and local government authorities; MSRH education reached 86% of schoolgirls and 72% of schoolboys, while over 93% of girls received menstrual kits. Total implementation cost across the four schools was 111,347,467 TZS (38,003 GBP), approximately 39.05 GBP per student, lower than comparable initiatives in East Africa. Findings indicate the intervention is feasible and acceptable in school settings and can inform future menstrual health and hygiene programs, though further research is needed to assess broader effectiveness and sustainability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"771-801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X261422289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X261422289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

负面的月经经历对女学生的社会参与、教育和整体健康产生不利影响,但坦桑尼亚学校的全面月经保健干预措施有限。本研究评估了以学校为基础的经期、性和生殖健康(MSRH)综合干预的可行性、可接受性、成本和潜在影响机制。该干预措施在四所中学进行了试点,包括为女孩和男孩开设教育课程、疼痛管理、分发月经包(可重复使用的卫生巾和月经杯)、改善WASH以及利益攸关方参与。混合方法过程评估使用定性方法(深度访谈、焦点小组讨论和WASH观察)和定量方法(调查问卷、教育会议的结构化观察、成本和监测数据)评估可接受性、保真度、成本、背景和潜在影响机制。这项干预措施受到了学生、教师和地方政府当局的好评;86%的女学生和72%的男学生接受了MSRH教育,93%以上的女孩获得了月经包。四所学校的总实施成本为111,347,467 TZS(38,003英镑),约为每位学生39.05英镑,低于东非的可比计划。研究结果表明,干预措施在学校环境中是可行和可接受的,可以为未来的月经健康和卫生项目提供信息,尽管需要进一步的研究来评估更广泛的有效性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability, Cost, and Uptake of a Multicomponent Menstrual, Sexual, and Reproductive Health Intervention in Secondary Schools in Northwest Tanzania: Lessons From the PASS MHW Pilot Study.

Negative menstruation experiences adversely affect schoolgirls' social participation, education, and overall health, yet comprehensive menstrual health interventions are limited in Tanzanian schools. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, cost, and potential impact mechanisms of a comprehensive school-based menstrual, sexual, and reproductive health (MSRH) intervention. The intervention, piloted in four secondary schools, included education sessions for girls and boys, pain management, distribution of menstrual kits (reusable pads and menstrual cups), WASH improvements, and stakeholder engagement. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed acceptability, fidelity, cost, context, and potential impact mechanisms using qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and WASH observations) and quantitative methods (survey questionnaires, structured observation of education sessions, costing, and monitoring data). The intervention was well received by students, teachers, and local government authorities; MSRH education reached 86% of schoolgirls and 72% of schoolboys, while over 93% of girls received menstrual kits. Total implementation cost across the four schools was 111,347,467 TZS (38,003 GBP), approximately 39.05 GBP per student, lower than comparable initiatives in East Africa. Findings indicate the intervention is feasible and acceptable in school settings and can inform future menstrual health and hygiene programs, though further research is needed to assess broader effectiveness and sustainability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Review
Evaluation Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Evaluation Review is the forum for researchers, planners, and policy makers engaged in the development, implementation, and utilization of studies aimed at the betterment of the human condition. The Editors invite submission of papers reporting the findings of evaluation studies in such fields as child development, health, education, income security, manpower, mental health, criminal justice, and the physical and social environments. In addition, Evaluation Review will contain articles on methodological developments, discussions of the state of the art, and commentaries on issues related to the application of research results. Special features will include periodic review essays, "research briefs", and "craft reports".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书