中频电能转移(TECAR)和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)对急性腘绳肌损伤运动员疼痛和柔韧性的急性影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.1 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Medicine and Health Science Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2025.05.001
Anna Kelli , Thomas Apostolou , Paris Iakovidis , Georgios Koutras , Eleftherios Kellis
{"title":"中频电能转移(TECAR)和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)对急性腘绳肌损伤运动员疼痛和柔韧性的急性影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Anna Kelli ,&nbsp;Thomas Apostolou ,&nbsp;Paris Iakovidis ,&nbsp;Georgios Koutras ,&nbsp;Eleftherios Kellis","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compared the acute effects of electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility after a hamstring injury. Young athletes received either a 20 ​min TECAR (<em>n</em> = ​24) or TENS (<em>n</em> ​= ​26) session within 5 days following a hamstring injury, while the control (CON, <em>n</em> ​= ​25) group was instructed to rest. Visual analogue scale (VAS), functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH), straight leg raise test (SLR), and sit-and-reach scores (STR) were obtained prior to, immediately, 24, and 48 ​h after therapy. Group differences were detected after therapy in VAS and FASH scores (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). Compared to pre-therapy measurements, VAS scores showed a greater decrease in the TECAR group (−38.75% to −63.33%) than in the TENS group (−16.67% to −25.00%) and both were greater than in the CON group (−2.81% to −9.81%) (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The TECAR group improved FASH scores (28.57%–48.21%) more than the TENS group (15.89%–27.79%) and both groups more than the CON group (0%–8.33%) (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The increase in SLR and STR was greater in the TECAR group (6.26%–13.96%) than in the TENS (1.72%–9.53%) and CON groups (0%–3.03%). These results suggest that in the acute phase of hamstring injury, the use of TECAR and, to a lesser extent, TENS may relieve pain symptoms and bring some improvements in flexibility more than instructing patients to rest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 210-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute effects of medium-frequency electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility in athletes with an acute hamstring injury: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Anna Kelli ,&nbsp;Thomas Apostolou ,&nbsp;Paris Iakovidis ,&nbsp;Georgios Koutras ,&nbsp;Eleftherios Kellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smhs.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study compared the acute effects of electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility after a hamstring injury. Young athletes received either a 20 ​min TECAR (<em>n</em> = ​24) or TENS (<em>n</em> ​= ​26) session within 5 days following a hamstring injury, while the control (CON, <em>n</em> ​= ​25) group was instructed to rest. Visual analogue scale (VAS), functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH), straight leg raise test (SLR), and sit-and-reach scores (STR) were obtained prior to, immediately, 24, and 48 ​h after therapy. Group differences were detected after therapy in VAS and FASH scores (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). Compared to pre-therapy measurements, VAS scores showed a greater decrease in the TECAR group (−38.75% to −63.33%) than in the TENS group (−16.67% to −25.00%) and both were greater than in the CON group (−2.81% to −9.81%) (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The TECAR group improved FASH scores (28.57%–48.21%) more than the TENS group (15.89%–27.79%) and both groups more than the CON group (0%–8.33%) (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The increase in SLR and STR was greater in the TECAR group (6.26%–13.96%) than in the TENS (1.72%–9.53%) and CON groups (0%–3.03%). These results suggest that in the acute phase of hamstring injury, the use of TECAR and, to a lesser extent, TENS may relieve pain symptoms and bring some improvements in flexibility more than instructing patients to rest.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 210-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337625000630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337625000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了电能量转移(TECAR)和经皮电刺激(TENS)对腘绳肌损伤后疼痛和柔韧性的急性影响。年轻运动员在腿筋受伤后5天内接受20分钟的TECAR (n = 24)或TENS (n = 26)训练,而对照组(n = 25)则被要求休息。分别在治疗前、治疗后立即、治疗后24和48 h进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)、急性腘绳肌损伤功能评定量表(FASH)、直腿抬高测试(SLR)和坐伸评分(STR)。治疗后VAS评分、FASH评分组间比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与治疗前比较,TECAR组VAS评分下降幅度(-38.75%至-63.33%)大于TENS组(-16.67%至-25.00%),且均大于CON组(-2.81%至-9.81%)(p < 0.05)。TECAR组改善FASH评分(28.57% ~ 48.21%)高于TENS组(15.89% ~ 27.79%),两组均高于CON组(0% ~ 8.33%)(p < 0.05)。TECAR组SLR和STR的升高(6.26% ~ 13.96%)高于TENS组(1.72% ~ 9.53%)和CON组(0% ~ 3.03%)。这些结果表明,在腘绳肌损伤的急性期,使用TECAR和在较小程度上使用TENS比指导患者休息更能缓解疼痛症状并改善灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute effects of medium-frequency electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility in athletes with an acute hamstring injury: A randomized controlled trial
This study compared the acute effects of electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility after a hamstring injury. Young athletes received either a 20 ​min TECAR (n = ​24) or TENS (n ​= ​26) session within 5 days following a hamstring injury, while the control (CON, n ​= ​25) group was instructed to rest. Visual analogue scale (VAS), functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH), straight leg raise test (SLR), and sit-and-reach scores (STR) were obtained prior to, immediately, 24, and 48 ​h after therapy. Group differences were detected after therapy in VAS and FASH scores (p ​< ​0.05). Compared to pre-therapy measurements, VAS scores showed a greater decrease in the TECAR group (−38.75% to −63.33%) than in the TENS group (−16.67% to −25.00%) and both were greater than in the CON group (−2.81% to −9.81%) (p ​< ​0.05). The TECAR group improved FASH scores (28.57%–48.21%) more than the TENS group (15.89%–27.79%) and both groups more than the CON group (0%–8.33%) (p ​< ​0.05). The increase in SLR and STR was greater in the TECAR group (6.26%–13.96%) than in the TENS (1.72%–9.53%) and CON groups (0%–3.03%). These results suggest that in the acute phase of hamstring injury, the use of TECAR and, to a lesser extent, TENS may relieve pain symptoms and bring some improvements in flexibility more than instructing patients to rest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书