便秘评分系统评价帕金森病患者和非帕金森病患者便秘治疗后的结果。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/padi/1105437
Kulthida Methawasin, Atip Krittayasingh, Kitsarawut Khuancharee, Piyanant Chonmaitree, Monton Wongwandee
{"title":"便秘评分系统评价帕金森病患者和非帕金森病患者便秘治疗后的结果。","authors":"Kulthida Methawasin, Atip Krittayasingh, Kitsarawut Khuancharee, Piyanant Chonmaitree, Monton Wongwandee","doi":"10.1155/padi/1105437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Constipation Scoring System (CSS) is a validated tool for assessing constipation severity and has been previously applied in Parkinson's disease (PD) populations. However, comparative data on post-treatment CSS outcomes between individuals with and without PD remain lacking. This study aimed to compare post-treatment constipation severity between PD and non-PD patients in real-world clinical settings, with particular focus on neurology and gastroenterology outpatient clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review included 67 patients with PD from a neurology clinic and 50 non-PD patients with constipation from a gastroenterology clinic. Baseline characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. Follow-up assessments were conducted through direct or telephone interviews to evaluate constipation severity using the CSS. Additional data were collected on patients' self-reported intake of water, coffee, carbohydrates, and fiber, as well as exercise habits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment CSS scores did not differ significantly between groups (PD: 6.07 ± 3.57 vs. non-PD: 5.24 ± 2.84; <i>p</i> = 0.172), with most participants classified as having mild constipation. No significant differences were observed in daily water, coffee, or fiber intake, or in exercise habits. However, non-PD patients reported significantly higher carbohydrate intake compared to PD patients (<i>p</i> = 0.003). PD patients more frequently reported long-standing constipation symptoms (≥ 6 years) than non-PD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patterns of laxative use also differed: while sennosides were most commonly used in both groups, non-PD patients more frequently used lactulose and mucilin, whereas PD patients more commonly used Unison enemas (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and milk of magnesia (<i>p</i> = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although constipation severity and treatment outcomes were comparable between PD and non-PD patients, PD patients more often experienced long-standing symptoms and demonstrated distinct patterns of laxative use. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate standardized treatment protocols to better clarify treatment outcomes and inform clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":"2026 ","pages":"1105437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes Following Constipation Treatments Between Parkinson's Disease and Non-Parkinson's Disease Patients Evaluated by the Constipation Scoring System.\",\"authors\":\"Kulthida Methawasin, Atip Krittayasingh, Kitsarawut Khuancharee, Piyanant Chonmaitree, Monton Wongwandee\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/padi/1105437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Constipation Scoring System (CSS) is a validated tool for assessing constipation severity and has been previously applied in Parkinson's disease (PD) populations. However, comparative data on post-treatment CSS outcomes between individuals with and without PD remain lacking. This study aimed to compare post-treatment constipation severity between PD and non-PD patients in real-world clinical settings, with particular focus on neurology and gastroenterology outpatient clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review included 67 patients with PD from a neurology clinic and 50 non-PD patients with constipation from a gastroenterology clinic. Baseline characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. Follow-up assessments were conducted through direct or telephone interviews to evaluate constipation severity using the CSS. Additional data were collected on patients' self-reported intake of water, coffee, carbohydrates, and fiber, as well as exercise habits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment CSS scores did not differ significantly between groups (PD: 6.07 ± 3.57 vs. non-PD: 5.24 ± 2.84; <i>p</i> = 0.172), with most participants classified as having mild constipation. No significant differences were observed in daily water, coffee, or fiber intake, or in exercise habits. However, non-PD patients reported significantly higher carbohydrate intake compared to PD patients (<i>p</i> = 0.003). PD patients more frequently reported long-standing constipation symptoms (≥ 6 years) than non-PD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patterns of laxative use also differed: while sennosides were most commonly used in both groups, non-PD patients more frequently used lactulose and mucilin, whereas PD patients more commonly used Unison enemas (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and milk of magnesia (<i>p</i> = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although constipation severity and treatment outcomes were comparable between PD and non-PD patients, PD patients more often experienced long-standing symptoms and demonstrated distinct patterns of laxative use. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate standardized treatment protocols to better clarify treatment outcomes and inform clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"2026 \",\"pages\":\"1105437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/padi/1105437\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/padi/1105437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:便秘评分系统(CSS)是一种评估便秘严重程度的有效工具,此前已应用于帕金森病(PD)人群。然而,PD患者和非PD患者治疗后CSS结果的比较数据仍然缺乏。本研究旨在比较PD和非PD患者治疗后便秘的严重程度,在真实的临床环境中,特别关注神经病学和胃肠病学门诊。方法:本回顾性图表综述包括来自神经病学诊所的67例PD患者和来自胃肠病学诊所的50例非PD伴便秘患者。从电子病历中检索基线特征。通过直接或电话访谈进行随访评估,使用CSS评估便秘严重程度。另外还收集了患者自我报告的水、咖啡、碳水化合物和纤维摄入量以及运动习惯的数据。结果:治疗后的CSS评分在两组间无显著差异(PD: 6.07±3.57 vs.非PD: 5.24±2.84;p = 0.172),大多数参与者被分类为轻度便秘。在日常饮水、咖啡、纤维摄入量或运动习惯方面没有观察到显著差异。然而,与PD患者相比,非PD患者报告的碳水化合物摄入量明显更高(p = 0.003)。PD患者比非PD患者更频繁地报告长期便秘症状(≥6年)(p < 0.001)。通便药的使用模式也有所不同:两组患者最常使用的是sennosides,非PD患者更常使用乳果糖和粘蛋白,而PD患者更常使用Unison灌肠剂(p = 0.020)和氧化镁乳(p = 0.070)。结论:尽管PD患者和非PD患者的便秘严重程度和治疗结果相当,但PD患者更经常经历长期症状,并表现出不同的泻药使用模式。前瞻性研究有必要评估标准化治疗方案,以更好地阐明治疗结果并为临床实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes Following Constipation Treatments Between Parkinson's Disease and Non-Parkinson's Disease Patients Evaluated by the Constipation Scoring System.

Objectives: The Constipation Scoring System (CSS) is a validated tool for assessing constipation severity and has been previously applied in Parkinson's disease (PD) populations. However, comparative data on post-treatment CSS outcomes between individuals with and without PD remain lacking. This study aimed to compare post-treatment constipation severity between PD and non-PD patients in real-world clinical settings, with particular focus on neurology and gastroenterology outpatient clinics.

Methods: This retrospective chart review included 67 patients with PD from a neurology clinic and 50 non-PD patients with constipation from a gastroenterology clinic. Baseline characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. Follow-up assessments were conducted through direct or telephone interviews to evaluate constipation severity using the CSS. Additional data were collected on patients' self-reported intake of water, coffee, carbohydrates, and fiber, as well as exercise habits.

Results: Post-treatment CSS scores did not differ significantly between groups (PD: 6.07 ± 3.57 vs. non-PD: 5.24 ± 2.84; p = 0.172), with most participants classified as having mild constipation. No significant differences were observed in daily water, coffee, or fiber intake, or in exercise habits. However, non-PD patients reported significantly higher carbohydrate intake compared to PD patients (p = 0.003). PD patients more frequently reported long-standing constipation symptoms (≥ 6 years) than non-PD patients (p < 0.001). Patterns of laxative use also differed: while sennosides were most commonly used in both groups, non-PD patients more frequently used lactulose and mucilin, whereas PD patients more commonly used Unison enemas (p = 0.020) and milk of magnesia (p = 0.070).

Conclusion: Although constipation severity and treatment outcomes were comparable between PD and non-PD patients, PD patients more often experienced long-standing symptoms and demonstrated distinct patterns of laxative use. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate standardized treatment protocols to better clarify treatment outcomes and inform clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书