回归标准化风险、风险比和风险差异的大样本置信区间

W.Dana Flanders, Philip H. Rhodes
{"title":"回归标准化风险、风险比和风险差异的大样本置信区间","authors":"W.Dana Flanders,&nbsp;Philip H. Rhodes","doi":"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90106-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several methods have been proposed for standardizing risks, risk ratios, and risk differences based on the results of logistic regression. These methods provide an alternative to direct standardization, a particularly useful approach when there are many covariates. In this paper, methods for calculating approximate confidence limits for these standardized measures are presented. A simple example, in which published data are used, illustrates the techniques and allows comparison with confidence limits calculated from the directly standardized risk ratio.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chronic diseases","volume":"40 7","pages":"Pages 697-704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90106-8","citationCount":"100","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large sample confidence intervals for regression standardized risks, risk ratios, and risk differences\",\"authors\":\"W.Dana Flanders,&nbsp;Philip H. Rhodes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90106-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Several methods have been proposed for standardizing risks, risk ratios, and risk differences based on the results of logistic regression. These methods provide an alternative to direct standardization, a particularly useful approach when there are many covariates. In this paper, methods for calculating approximate confidence limits for these standardized measures are presented. A simple example, in which published data are used, illustrates the techniques and allows comparison with confidence limits calculated from the directly standardized risk ratio.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"volume\":\"40 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 697-704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90106-8\",\"citationCount\":\"100\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187901068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chronic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187901068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

摘要

基于逻辑回归的结果,提出了几种标准化风险、风险比和风险差异的方法。这些方法提供了一种直接标准化的替代方法,当存在许多协变量时,这是一种特别有用的方法。本文给出了这些标准化测度的近似置信限的计算方法。一个简单的例子,其中使用了已公布的数据,说明了这些技术,并允许与直接标准化风险比率计算的置信限进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large sample confidence intervals for regression standardized risks, risk ratios, and risk differences

Several methods have been proposed for standardizing risks, risk ratios, and risk differences based on the results of logistic regression. These methods provide an alternative to direct standardization, a particularly useful approach when there are many covariates. In this paper, methods for calculating approximate confidence limits for these standardized measures are presented. A simple example, in which published data are used, illustrates the techniques and allows comparison with confidence limits calculated from the directly standardized risk ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信