围产期毒理学和法律。

R A Morris, T B Sonderegger
{"title":"围产期毒理学和法律。","authors":"R A Morris,&nbsp;T B Sonderegger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New perinatal toxicology research findings not only extend scientific knowledge but they also produce legal changes as they reach public domain. This article examines the interaction between perinatal drug research and the law. The reactivity of the law in assimilating research on exposure of the developing organism to a broad range of neurotoxins, including both licit and illicit drugs, is illustrated. Outcomes of some cases depend to a great extent upon legal concepts invoked rather than upon the scientific evidence involved. Proposed policy changes and their implications for scientists are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19112,"journal":{"name":"Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology","volume":"8 4","pages":"363-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal toxicology and the law.\",\"authors\":\"R A Morris,&nbsp;T B Sonderegger\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New perinatal toxicology research findings not only extend scientific knowledge but they also produce legal changes as they reach public domain. This article examines the interaction between perinatal drug research and the law. The reactivity of the law in assimilating research on exposure of the developing organism to a broad range of neurotoxins, including both licit and illicit drugs, is illustrated. Outcomes of some cases depend to a great extent upon legal concepts invoked rather than upon the scientific evidence involved. Proposed policy changes and their implications for scientists are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"363-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的围产期毒理学研究成果不仅扩展了科学知识,而且在进入公共领域时也产生了法律变化。本文探讨围产期药物研究与法律之间的相互作用。法律的反应性在吸收研究暴露的发展有机体广泛的神经毒素,包括合法和非法药物,是说明。一些案件的结果在很大程度上取决于所援引的法律概念,而不是所涉及的科学证据。讨论了拟议的政策变化及其对科学家的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perinatal toxicology and the law.

New perinatal toxicology research findings not only extend scientific knowledge but they also produce legal changes as they reach public domain. This article examines the interaction between perinatal drug research and the law. The reactivity of the law in assimilating research on exposure of the developing organism to a broad range of neurotoxins, including both licit and illicit drugs, is illustrated. Outcomes of some cases depend to a great extent upon legal concepts invoked rather than upon the scientific evidence involved. Proposed policy changes and their implications for scientists are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信