年龄对抗链球菌细胞膜抗血清对小鼠肾小球基底膜反应性的影响。体外与体内对比分析。

Renal physiology Pub Date : 1986-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000173079
C F Lange, M Weber, R P Nayyar
{"title":"年龄对抗链球菌细胞膜抗血清对小鼠肾小球基底膜反应性的影响。体外与体内对比分析。","authors":"C F Lange,&nbsp;M Weber,&nbsp;R P Nayyar","doi":"10.1159/000173079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antisera to the streptococcal cell membrane (SCM) were evaluated for their reactivity to murine glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in four strains of mice. Animals were studied on a daily basis from birth through 3 months and weekly thereafter through 18 months. Paired animals were compared for in vivo binding of antibody versus an indirect fluorescent antibody technique on fresh kidney sections. The findings demonstrated a granular type GBM staining for all anti-SCM which were positive. Nonspecific background staining accompanied most of the indirect fluorescent antibody sections tested while being totally absent for the direct fluorescent test on tissue from in vivo challenge of the primary antibody. The in vitro testing showed tissue from young mice (0-6 days old) to be most reactive, while the strongest reactivity was seen in the age group of 10-20 days for in vivo testing. These cross-reactive antibodies, i.e., GBM-binding anti-SCM, are best evaluated by in vivo methods where tissue is taken 4 days after antiserum injection. Animals of the age range 6-8 weeks were often negative, indicating that this age range selected for many studies may not be the most favorable one via either in vitro or in vivo studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":77779,"journal":{"name":"Renal physiology","volume":"9 3","pages":"148-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000173079","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age effects on the reactivity of antistreptococcal cell membrane antisera to murine glomerular basement membrane. In vitro versus in vivo analysis.\",\"authors\":\"C F Lange,&nbsp;M Weber,&nbsp;R P Nayyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000173079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antisera to the streptococcal cell membrane (SCM) were evaluated for their reactivity to murine glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in four strains of mice. Animals were studied on a daily basis from birth through 3 months and weekly thereafter through 18 months. Paired animals were compared for in vivo binding of antibody versus an indirect fluorescent antibody technique on fresh kidney sections. The findings demonstrated a granular type GBM staining for all anti-SCM which were positive. Nonspecific background staining accompanied most of the indirect fluorescent antibody sections tested while being totally absent for the direct fluorescent test on tissue from in vivo challenge of the primary antibody. The in vitro testing showed tissue from young mice (0-6 days old) to be most reactive, while the strongest reactivity was seen in the age group of 10-20 days for in vivo testing. These cross-reactive antibodies, i.e., GBM-binding anti-SCM, are best evaluated by in vivo methods where tissue is taken 4 days after antiserum injection. Animals of the age range 6-8 weeks were often negative, indicating that this age range selected for many studies may not be the most favorable one via either in vitro or in vivo studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renal physiology\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"148-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000173079\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renal physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000173079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000173079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究了4株小鼠链球菌细胞膜抗血清对小鼠肾小球基底膜的反应性。从出生到3个月,每天对动物进行研究,此后到18个月,每周对动物进行研究。配对动物在新鲜肾脏切片上比较了抗体的体内结合与间接荧光抗体技术。结果显示,所有抗scm阳性的GBM均呈颗粒型染色。非特异性背景染色伴随着大多数间接荧光抗体测试切片,而在一抗体内攻击组织的直接荧光测试中完全没有。体外实验显示,幼龄小鼠(0-6日龄)的组织反应性最强,而体内实验显示,10-20日龄小鼠的组织反应性最强。这些交叉反应抗体,即gbm结合抗scm,最好通过体内方法进行评估,在抗血清注射后4天取组织。6-8周龄的动物通常为阴性,这表明许多研究选择的这个年龄范围可能不是体外或体内研究中最有利的年龄范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age effects on the reactivity of antistreptococcal cell membrane antisera to murine glomerular basement membrane. In vitro versus in vivo analysis.

Antisera to the streptococcal cell membrane (SCM) were evaluated for their reactivity to murine glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in four strains of mice. Animals were studied on a daily basis from birth through 3 months and weekly thereafter through 18 months. Paired animals were compared for in vivo binding of antibody versus an indirect fluorescent antibody technique on fresh kidney sections. The findings demonstrated a granular type GBM staining for all anti-SCM which were positive. Nonspecific background staining accompanied most of the indirect fluorescent antibody sections tested while being totally absent for the direct fluorescent test on tissue from in vivo challenge of the primary antibody. The in vitro testing showed tissue from young mice (0-6 days old) to be most reactive, while the strongest reactivity was seen in the age group of 10-20 days for in vivo testing. These cross-reactive antibodies, i.e., GBM-binding anti-SCM, are best evaluated by in vivo methods where tissue is taken 4 days after antiserum injection. Animals of the age range 6-8 weeks were often negative, indicating that this age range selected for many studies may not be the most favorable one via either in vitro or in vivo studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信